Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study

ObjectiveAtypical meningioma is a non-benign tumor, and its prognostic factors and treatment strategies are unclear.MethodsPatients with atypical meningioma, between 2004 and 2016, were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Then, we randomly divided patients into a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gui-Jun Zhang, Xiao-Yin Liu, Chao You
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.676683/full
id doaj-9400a81401774dadbbe3918aac8b6ee2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9400a81401774dadbbe3918aac8b6ee22021-05-26T06:26:13ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-05-011110.3389/fonc.2021.676683676683Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based StudyGui-Jun ZhangXiao-Yin LiuChao YouObjectiveAtypical meningioma is a non-benign tumor, and its prognostic factors and treatment strategies are unclear.MethodsPatients with atypical meningioma, between 2004 and 2016, were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Then, we randomly divided patients into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 8:2. The nomogram was constructed based on the multivariate Cox regression analyses. And the concordance index, calibration curves, and receiver operating character were used to assess the predictive ability of the nomogram. We divided the patient scores into three groups and constructed a survival curve using Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsAfter our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2358 patients were histologically diagnosed of atypical meningioma. The prognostic nomogram comprised factors of overall survival, including age, tumor size and surgery. The concordance index was 0.715 (95%CI=0.688-0.742) for overall survival in the training set and 0.688 (95%CI=0.629-0.747) for overall survival in the validation set. The calibration curves and receiver operating character also indicated the good predictability of the nomogram. Risk stratification revealed a statistically significant difference among the three groups of patients according to quartiles of risk score.ConclusionGross total resection is an independent factor for survival, and radiation after non-gross total resection potentially confers a survival advantage for patients with atypical meningioma.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.676683/fullatypical meningiomaprognostic factortreatmentSEER databasenomogram
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gui-Jun Zhang
Xiao-Yin Liu
Chao You
spellingShingle Gui-Jun Zhang
Xiao-Yin Liu
Chao You
Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study
Frontiers in Oncology
atypical meningioma
prognostic factor
treatment
SEER database
nomogram
author_facet Gui-Jun Zhang
Xiao-Yin Liu
Chao You
author_sort Gui-Jun Zhang
title Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study
title_short Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study
title_full Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study
title_fullStr Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study
title_sort clinical factors and outcomes of atypical meningioma: a population-based study
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2021-05-01
description ObjectiveAtypical meningioma is a non-benign tumor, and its prognostic factors and treatment strategies are unclear.MethodsPatients with atypical meningioma, between 2004 and 2016, were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Then, we randomly divided patients into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 8:2. The nomogram was constructed based on the multivariate Cox regression analyses. And the concordance index, calibration curves, and receiver operating character were used to assess the predictive ability of the nomogram. We divided the patient scores into three groups and constructed a survival curve using Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsAfter our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2358 patients were histologically diagnosed of atypical meningioma. The prognostic nomogram comprised factors of overall survival, including age, tumor size and surgery. The concordance index was 0.715 (95%CI=0.688-0.742) for overall survival in the training set and 0.688 (95%CI=0.629-0.747) for overall survival in the validation set. The calibration curves and receiver operating character also indicated the good predictability of the nomogram. Risk stratification revealed a statistically significant difference among the three groups of patients according to quartiles of risk score.ConclusionGross total resection is an independent factor for survival, and radiation after non-gross total resection potentially confers a survival advantage for patients with atypical meningioma.
topic atypical meningioma
prognostic factor
treatment
SEER database
nomogram
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.676683/full
work_keys_str_mv AT guijunzhang clinicalfactorsandoutcomesofatypicalmeningiomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT xiaoyinliu clinicalfactorsandoutcomesofatypicalmeningiomaapopulationbasedstudy
AT chaoyou clinicalfactorsandoutcomesofatypicalmeningiomaapopulationbasedstudy
_version_ 1721426428195504128