Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study
ObjectiveAtypical meningioma is a non-benign tumor, and its prognostic factors and treatment strategies are unclear.MethodsPatients with atypical meningioma, between 2004 and 2016, were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Then, we randomly divided patients into a...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-05-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Oncology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.676683/full |
id |
doaj-9400a81401774dadbbe3918aac8b6ee2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9400a81401774dadbbe3918aac8b6ee22021-05-26T06:26:13ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-05-011110.3389/fonc.2021.676683676683Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based StudyGui-Jun ZhangXiao-Yin LiuChao YouObjectiveAtypical meningioma is a non-benign tumor, and its prognostic factors and treatment strategies are unclear.MethodsPatients with atypical meningioma, between 2004 and 2016, were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Then, we randomly divided patients into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 8:2. The nomogram was constructed based on the multivariate Cox regression analyses. And the concordance index, calibration curves, and receiver operating character were used to assess the predictive ability of the nomogram. We divided the patient scores into three groups and constructed a survival curve using Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsAfter our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2358 patients were histologically diagnosed of atypical meningioma. The prognostic nomogram comprised factors of overall survival, including age, tumor size and surgery. The concordance index was 0.715 (95%CI=0.688-0.742) for overall survival in the training set and 0.688 (95%CI=0.629-0.747) for overall survival in the validation set. The calibration curves and receiver operating character also indicated the good predictability of the nomogram. Risk stratification revealed a statistically significant difference among the three groups of patients according to quartiles of risk score.ConclusionGross total resection is an independent factor for survival, and radiation after non-gross total resection potentially confers a survival advantage for patients with atypical meningioma.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.676683/fullatypical meningiomaprognostic factortreatmentSEER databasenomogram |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Gui-Jun Zhang Xiao-Yin Liu Chao You |
spellingShingle |
Gui-Jun Zhang Xiao-Yin Liu Chao You Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study Frontiers in Oncology atypical meningioma prognostic factor treatment SEER database nomogram |
author_facet |
Gui-Jun Zhang Xiao-Yin Liu Chao You |
author_sort |
Gui-Jun Zhang |
title |
Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study |
title_short |
Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study |
title_full |
Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study |
title_fullStr |
Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Clinical Factors and Outcomes of Atypical Meningioma: A Population-Based Study |
title_sort |
clinical factors and outcomes of atypical meningioma: a population-based study |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Oncology |
issn |
2234-943X |
publishDate |
2021-05-01 |
description |
ObjectiveAtypical meningioma is a non-benign tumor, and its prognostic factors and treatment strategies are unclear.MethodsPatients with atypical meningioma, between 2004 and 2016, were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Then, we randomly divided patients into a training set and a validation set at a ratio of 8:2. The nomogram was constructed based on the multivariate Cox regression analyses. And the concordance index, calibration curves, and receiver operating character were used to assess the predictive ability of the nomogram. We divided the patient scores into three groups and constructed a survival curve using Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsAfter our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 2358 patients were histologically diagnosed of atypical meningioma. The prognostic nomogram comprised factors of overall survival, including age, tumor size and surgery. The concordance index was 0.715 (95%CI=0.688-0.742) for overall survival in the training set and 0.688 (95%CI=0.629-0.747) for overall survival in the validation set. The calibration curves and receiver operating character also indicated the good predictability of the nomogram. Risk stratification revealed a statistically significant difference among the three groups of patients according to quartiles of risk score.ConclusionGross total resection is an independent factor for survival, and radiation after non-gross total resection potentially confers a survival advantage for patients with atypical meningioma. |
topic |
atypical meningioma prognostic factor treatment SEER database nomogram |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.676683/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT guijunzhang clinicalfactorsandoutcomesofatypicalmeningiomaapopulationbasedstudy AT xiaoyinliu clinicalfactorsandoutcomesofatypicalmeningiomaapopulationbasedstudy AT chaoyou clinicalfactorsandoutcomesofatypicalmeningiomaapopulationbasedstudy |
_version_ |
1721426428195504128 |