Student Attitudes Toward Poverty in a Social Welfare Policy Course: Online Versus Face to Face

The growth of online higher education has presented important questions for social workers in academia. Can a human-based profession be properly taught online? In macro courses, are social work students able to gain a complex understanding of human experience, social justice, and oppression without...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leah Hamilton, Lindsay Daughtry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2017-05-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017709326
id doaj-93fea6df9f3d463bbe2884806d873c6a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93fea6df9f3d463bbe2884806d873c6a2020-11-25T02:54:29ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402017-05-01710.1177/2158244017709326Student Attitudes Toward Poverty in a Social Welfare Policy Course: Online Versus Face to FaceLeah Hamilton0Lindsay Daughtry1Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USAAppalachian State University, Boone, NC, USAThe growth of online higher education has presented important questions for social workers in academia. Can a human-based profession be properly taught online? In macro courses, are social work students able to gain a complex understanding of human experience, social justice, and oppression without the benefit of face-to-face debate and dialogue? In an undergraduate social welfare policy course, pre and post anonymous opinions surveys were collected on the causes of poverty. Students in both a face-to-face and an online course section, were asked to rate their agreement with the statements “Poverty is usually caused by individual actions” and “Poverty is usually caused by societal actions.” While no statistically significant changes appeared for face-to-face students, online students were more likely to decrease blame for individual actions and increased attribution for societal actions at posttest. Reasons for this difference will be discussed, including the possible role of peer influence in face-to-face course sessions.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017709326
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leah Hamilton
Lindsay Daughtry
spellingShingle Leah Hamilton
Lindsay Daughtry
Student Attitudes Toward Poverty in a Social Welfare Policy Course: Online Versus Face to Face
SAGE Open
author_facet Leah Hamilton
Lindsay Daughtry
author_sort Leah Hamilton
title Student Attitudes Toward Poverty in a Social Welfare Policy Course: Online Versus Face to Face
title_short Student Attitudes Toward Poverty in a Social Welfare Policy Course: Online Versus Face to Face
title_full Student Attitudes Toward Poverty in a Social Welfare Policy Course: Online Versus Face to Face
title_fullStr Student Attitudes Toward Poverty in a Social Welfare Policy Course: Online Versus Face to Face
title_full_unstemmed Student Attitudes Toward Poverty in a Social Welfare Policy Course: Online Versus Face to Face
title_sort student attitudes toward poverty in a social welfare policy course: online versus face to face
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2017-05-01
description The growth of online higher education has presented important questions for social workers in academia. Can a human-based profession be properly taught online? In macro courses, are social work students able to gain a complex understanding of human experience, social justice, and oppression without the benefit of face-to-face debate and dialogue? In an undergraduate social welfare policy course, pre and post anonymous opinions surveys were collected on the causes of poverty. Students in both a face-to-face and an online course section, were asked to rate their agreement with the statements “Poverty is usually caused by individual actions” and “Poverty is usually caused by societal actions.” While no statistically significant changes appeared for face-to-face students, online students were more likely to decrease blame for individual actions and increased attribution for societal actions at posttest. Reasons for this difference will be discussed, including the possible role of peer influence in face-to-face course sessions.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017709326
work_keys_str_mv AT leahhamilton studentattitudestowardpovertyinasocialwelfarepolicycourseonlineversusfacetoface
AT lindsaydaughtry studentattitudestowardpovertyinasocialwelfarepolicycourseonlineversusfacetoface
_version_ 1724720930806038528