Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Monitoring Macroalgal Biodiversity: Comparison of RGB and Multispectral Imaging Sensors for Biodiversity Assessments

Developments in the capabilities and affordability of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have led to an explosion in their use for a range of ecological and agricultural remote sensing applications. However, the ubiquity of visible light cameras aboard readily available UAVs may be limiting the applica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leigh Tait, Jochen Bind, Hannah Charan-Dixon, Ian Hawes, John Pirker, David Schiel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-10-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/19/2332
id doaj-93edd71b284d4e3a828869c0f8306fe1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93edd71b284d4e3a828869c0f8306fe12020-11-25T01:01:09ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922019-10-011119233210.3390/rs11192332rs11192332Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Monitoring Macroalgal Biodiversity: Comparison of RGB and Multispectral Imaging Sensors for Biodiversity AssessmentsLeigh Tait0Jochen Bind1Hannah Charan-Dixon2Ian Hawes3John Pirker4David Schiel5National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Christchurch 8011, New ZealandNational Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Christchurch 8011, New ZealandSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New ZealandUniversity of Waikato, Hamilton 3216, New ZealandSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New ZealandSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New ZealandDevelopments in the capabilities and affordability of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have led to an explosion in their use for a range of ecological and agricultural remote sensing applications. However, the ubiquity of visible light cameras aboard readily available UAVs may be limiting the application of these devices for fine-scale, high taxonomic resolution monitoring. Here we compare the use of RGB and multispectral cameras deployed aboard UAVs for assessing intertidal and shallow subtidal marine macroalgae to a high taxonomic resolution. Our results show that the diverse spectral profiles of marine macroalgae naturally lend themselves to remote sensing and habitat classification. Furthermore, we show that biodiversity assessments, particularly in shallow subtidal habitats, are enhanced using six-band discrete wavelength multispectral sensors (81% accuracy, Cohen’s Kappa) compared to three-band broad channel RGB sensors (79% accuracy, Cohen’s Kappa) for 10 habitat classes. Combining broad band RGB signals and narrow band multispectral sensing further improved the accuracy of classification with a combined accuracy of 90% (Cohen’s Kappa). Despite notable improvements in accuracy with multispectral imaging, RGB sensors were highly capable of broad habitat classification and rivaled multispectral sensors for classifying intertidal habitats. High spatial scale monitoring of turbid exposed rocky reefs presents a unique set of challenges, but the limitations of more traditional methods can be overcome by targeting ideal conditions with UAVs.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/19/2332dronesmultispectralmacroalgaebiodiversityunmanned aerial vehicles (uavs)habitatclassification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leigh Tait
Jochen Bind
Hannah Charan-Dixon
Ian Hawes
John Pirker
David Schiel
spellingShingle Leigh Tait
Jochen Bind
Hannah Charan-Dixon
Ian Hawes
John Pirker
David Schiel
Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Monitoring Macroalgal Biodiversity: Comparison of RGB and Multispectral Imaging Sensors for Biodiversity Assessments
Remote Sensing
drones
multispectral
macroalgae
biodiversity
unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs)
habitat
classification
author_facet Leigh Tait
Jochen Bind
Hannah Charan-Dixon
Ian Hawes
John Pirker
David Schiel
author_sort Leigh Tait
title Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Monitoring Macroalgal Biodiversity: Comparison of RGB and Multispectral Imaging Sensors for Biodiversity Assessments
title_short Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Monitoring Macroalgal Biodiversity: Comparison of RGB and Multispectral Imaging Sensors for Biodiversity Assessments
title_full Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Monitoring Macroalgal Biodiversity: Comparison of RGB and Multispectral Imaging Sensors for Biodiversity Assessments
title_fullStr Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Monitoring Macroalgal Biodiversity: Comparison of RGB and Multispectral Imaging Sensors for Biodiversity Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) for Monitoring Macroalgal Biodiversity: Comparison of RGB and Multispectral Imaging Sensors for Biodiversity Assessments
title_sort unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs) for monitoring macroalgal biodiversity: comparison of rgb and multispectral imaging sensors for biodiversity assessments
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2019-10-01
description Developments in the capabilities and affordability of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have led to an explosion in their use for a range of ecological and agricultural remote sensing applications. However, the ubiquity of visible light cameras aboard readily available UAVs may be limiting the application of these devices for fine-scale, high taxonomic resolution monitoring. Here we compare the use of RGB and multispectral cameras deployed aboard UAVs for assessing intertidal and shallow subtidal marine macroalgae to a high taxonomic resolution. Our results show that the diverse spectral profiles of marine macroalgae naturally lend themselves to remote sensing and habitat classification. Furthermore, we show that biodiversity assessments, particularly in shallow subtidal habitats, are enhanced using six-band discrete wavelength multispectral sensors (81% accuracy, Cohen’s Kappa) compared to three-band broad channel RGB sensors (79% accuracy, Cohen’s Kappa) for 10 habitat classes. Combining broad band RGB signals and narrow band multispectral sensing further improved the accuracy of classification with a combined accuracy of 90% (Cohen’s Kappa). Despite notable improvements in accuracy with multispectral imaging, RGB sensors were highly capable of broad habitat classification and rivaled multispectral sensors for classifying intertidal habitats. High spatial scale monitoring of turbid exposed rocky reefs presents a unique set of challenges, but the limitations of more traditional methods can be overcome by targeting ideal conditions with UAVs.
topic drones
multispectral
macroalgae
biodiversity
unmanned aerial vehicles (uavs)
habitat
classification
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/19/2332
work_keys_str_mv AT leightait unmannedaerialvehiclesuavsformonitoringmacroalgalbiodiversitycomparisonofrgbandmultispectralimagingsensorsforbiodiversityassessments
AT jochenbind unmannedaerialvehiclesuavsformonitoringmacroalgalbiodiversitycomparisonofrgbandmultispectralimagingsensorsforbiodiversityassessments
AT hannahcharandixon unmannedaerialvehiclesuavsformonitoringmacroalgalbiodiversitycomparisonofrgbandmultispectralimagingsensorsforbiodiversityassessments
AT ianhawes unmannedaerialvehiclesuavsformonitoringmacroalgalbiodiversitycomparisonofrgbandmultispectralimagingsensorsforbiodiversityassessments
AT johnpirker unmannedaerialvehiclesuavsformonitoringmacroalgalbiodiversitycomparisonofrgbandmultispectralimagingsensorsforbiodiversityassessments
AT davidschiel unmannedaerialvehiclesuavsformonitoringmacroalgalbiodiversitycomparisonofrgbandmultispectralimagingsensorsforbiodiversityassessments
_version_ 1725210500683268096