An Indirect Comparison Between Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Two Cycles of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BackgroundNivolumab + ipilimumab + two cycles chemotherapy (N-I + chemo, intensive immunotherapy but chemo-light) and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (Pem + chemo) were both recommended as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. We conducted this indirect com...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Panpan Jiang, Ziyang Mao, Qinyang Wang, Xiaohui Jia, Luying Geng, Hong Xu, Lili Jiang, Chengcheng Yang, Min Jiao, Hui Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.698199/full
id doaj-93e8f0e61c984202999aafd2903ce0a6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93e8f0e61c984202999aafd2903ce0a62021-09-13T05:30:12ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2021-09-011110.3389/fonc.2021.698199698199An Indirect Comparison Between Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Two Cycles of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung CancerPanpan Jiang0Ziyang Mao1Qinyang Wang2Xiaohui Jia3Luying Geng4Hong Xu5Lili Jiang6Chengcheng Yang7Min Jiao8Hui Guo9Hui Guo10Hui Guo11Department of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaKey Laboratory of Environment and Genes Related to Diseases, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Ministry of Education of China, Xi’an, ChinaCentre for Translational Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, ChinaBackgroundNivolumab + ipilimumab + two cycles chemotherapy (N-I + chemo, intensive immunotherapy but chemo-light) and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (Pem + chemo) were both recommended as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. We conducted this indirect comparison to compare the efficacy of and safety between these two treatments for providing reference for decision making.MethodsRelevant databases were searched for eligible trials. A well-accepted adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was selected to pool efficacy results and safety outcomes. Subgroup analyses were stratified according to PD-L1 expression and clinical characteristics.ResultsFour eligible randomized trials (CheckMate9LA, KEYNOTE-021G, KEYNOTE 189, KEYNOTE 407) involving 2017 patients were available to analyze. The ITC results suggested that N-I + chemo is comparable to Pem + chemo in OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.30) and ORR (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62-1.06), but tended to yield inferior PFS (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.59) than did Pem + chemo. As for safety profiles, N-I + chemo showed no significant difference relative to Pem + chemo in any grade adverse events: (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.10), but demonstrated reduced toxicity in chemo-related adverse events, such as anemia (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.81), neutropenia (RR0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.79), and thrombocytopenia (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69).ConclusionsN-I + chemo is a promising treatment option for providing comparable OS related to Pem + chemo. However, for never smoker female patients, Pem + chemo is preferable to choose for demonstrating favorable OS benefit than N-I + chemo.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.698199/fullpembrolizumabnivolumabipilimumabnon-small cell lung cancerefficacysafety
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Panpan Jiang
Ziyang Mao
Qinyang Wang
Xiaohui Jia
Luying Geng
Hong Xu
Lili Jiang
Chengcheng Yang
Min Jiao
Hui Guo
Hui Guo
Hui Guo
spellingShingle Panpan Jiang
Ziyang Mao
Qinyang Wang
Xiaohui Jia
Luying Geng
Hong Xu
Lili Jiang
Chengcheng Yang
Min Jiao
Hui Guo
Hui Guo
Hui Guo
An Indirect Comparison Between Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Two Cycles of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Frontiers in Oncology
pembrolizumab
nivolumab
ipilimumab
non-small cell lung cancer
efficacy
safety
author_facet Panpan Jiang
Ziyang Mao
Qinyang Wang
Xiaohui Jia
Luying Geng
Hong Xu
Lili Jiang
Chengcheng Yang
Min Jiao
Hui Guo
Hui Guo
Hui Guo
author_sort Panpan Jiang
title An Indirect Comparison Between Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Two Cycles of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_short An Indirect Comparison Between Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Two Cycles of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full An Indirect Comparison Between Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Two Cycles of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_fullStr An Indirect Comparison Between Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Two Cycles of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed An Indirect Comparison Between Nivolumab + Ipilimumab + Two Cycles of Chemotherapy vs. Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
title_sort indirect comparison between nivolumab + ipilimumab + two cycles of chemotherapy vs. pembrolizumab + chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2021-09-01
description BackgroundNivolumab + ipilimumab + two cycles chemotherapy (N-I + chemo, intensive immunotherapy but chemo-light) and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy (Pem + chemo) were both recommended as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. We conducted this indirect comparison to compare the efficacy of and safety between these two treatments for providing reference for decision making.MethodsRelevant databases were searched for eligible trials. A well-accepted adjusted indirect treatment comparison (ITC) approach was selected to pool efficacy results and safety outcomes. Subgroup analyses were stratified according to PD-L1 expression and clinical characteristics.ResultsFour eligible randomized trials (CheckMate9LA, KEYNOTE-021G, KEYNOTE 189, KEYNOTE 407) involving 2017 patients were available to analyze. The ITC results suggested that N-I + chemo is comparable to Pem + chemo in OS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.30) and ORR (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.62-1.06), but tended to yield inferior PFS (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.04-1.59) than did Pem + chemo. As for safety profiles, N-I + chemo showed no significant difference relative to Pem + chemo in any grade adverse events: (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.99-1.10), but demonstrated reduced toxicity in chemo-related adverse events, such as anemia (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.81), neutropenia (RR0.51, 95% CI 0.33-0.79), and thrombocytopenia (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.21-0.69).ConclusionsN-I + chemo is a promising treatment option for providing comparable OS related to Pem + chemo. However, for never smoker female patients, Pem + chemo is preferable to choose for demonstrating favorable OS benefit than N-I + chemo.
topic pembrolizumab
nivolumab
ipilimumab
non-small cell lung cancer
efficacy
safety
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2021.698199/full
work_keys_str_mv AT panpanjiang anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ziyangmao anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT qinyangwang anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT xiaohuijia anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT luyinggeng anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hongxu anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT lilijiang anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chengchengyang anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT minjiao anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT huiguo anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT huiguo anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT huiguo anindirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT panpanjiang indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT ziyangmao indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT qinyangwang indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT xiaohuijia indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT luyinggeng indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT hongxu indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT lilijiang indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT chengchengyang indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT minjiao indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT huiguo indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT huiguo indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
AT huiguo indirectcomparisonbetweennivolumabipilimumabtwocyclesofchemotherapyvspembrolizumabchemotherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticnonsmallcelllungcancer
_version_ 1717381438111744000