Estimation of Critical Headway at Small Urban Roundabout

Before choosing an intersection project design, an important step is to examine the justification of the construction on the basis of defined criteria. One of the key criteria is the analysis of capacity. Large numbers of roundabout capacity models are present in the world, most of them adapted to t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Danijela Maslać, Dražen Cvitanić, Ivan Lovrić
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences 2020-02-01
Series:Promet (Zagreb)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/3155
id doaj-93e2eeaa0a0d47b4935bd6ba6854627f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93e2eeaa0a0d47b4935bd6ba6854627f2020-11-25T02:04:51ZengUniversity of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic SciencesPromet (Zagreb)0353-53201848-40692020-02-0132110311710.7307/ptt.v32i1.31553155Estimation of Critical Headway at Small Urban RoundaboutDanijela Maslać0Dražen Cvitanić1Ivan Lovrić2University of Mostar, Faculty of Civil EngineeringUniversity of Split, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Architecture and GeodesyUniversity of Mostar, Faculty of Civil EngineeringBefore choosing an intersection project design, an important step is to examine the justification of the construction on the basis of defined criteria. One of the key criteria is the analysis of capacity. Large numbers of roundabout capacity models are present in the world, most of them adapted to the conditions of the country they originate from and they need to be calibrated for local conditions. Key parameters for calibration are critical headway and follow-up headway. Follow-up headway can be measured directly in the field, while critical headway cannot be measured, but is estimated. Many critical headway estimation methods exist (over 30) and each of them provides different values. Different values of critical headway result in different capacity estimation values. This raises the question which method provides more realistic estimations under certain conditions. In this paper, four most frequently used critical headway estimation methods (Raff, Maximum likelihood method, Wu, Logit) were selected to be tested by comparison of theoretical capacity models and actual measured capacity at a small urban roundabout.https://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/3155small urban roundaboutestimation of critical headwaymeasured capacitymodel testing
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Danijela Maslać
Dražen Cvitanić
Ivan Lovrić
spellingShingle Danijela Maslać
Dražen Cvitanić
Ivan Lovrić
Estimation of Critical Headway at Small Urban Roundabout
Promet (Zagreb)
small urban roundabout
estimation of critical headway
measured capacity
model testing
author_facet Danijela Maslać
Dražen Cvitanić
Ivan Lovrić
author_sort Danijela Maslać
title Estimation of Critical Headway at Small Urban Roundabout
title_short Estimation of Critical Headway at Small Urban Roundabout
title_full Estimation of Critical Headway at Small Urban Roundabout
title_fullStr Estimation of Critical Headway at Small Urban Roundabout
title_full_unstemmed Estimation of Critical Headway at Small Urban Roundabout
title_sort estimation of critical headway at small urban roundabout
publisher University of Zagreb, Faculty of Transport and Traffic Sciences
series Promet (Zagreb)
issn 0353-5320
1848-4069
publishDate 2020-02-01
description Before choosing an intersection project design, an important step is to examine the justification of the construction on the basis of defined criteria. One of the key criteria is the analysis of capacity. Large numbers of roundabout capacity models are present in the world, most of them adapted to the conditions of the country they originate from and they need to be calibrated for local conditions. Key parameters for calibration are critical headway and follow-up headway. Follow-up headway can be measured directly in the field, while critical headway cannot be measured, but is estimated. Many critical headway estimation methods exist (over 30) and each of them provides different values. Different values of critical headway result in different capacity estimation values. This raises the question which method provides more realistic estimations under certain conditions. In this paper, four most frequently used critical headway estimation methods (Raff, Maximum likelihood method, Wu, Logit) were selected to be tested by comparison of theoretical capacity models and actual measured capacity at a small urban roundabout.
topic small urban roundabout
estimation of critical headway
measured capacity
model testing
url https://traffic.fpz.hr/index.php/PROMTT/article/view/3155
work_keys_str_mv AT danijelamaslac estimationofcriticalheadwayatsmallurbanroundabout
AT drazencvitanic estimationofcriticalheadwayatsmallurbanroundabout
AT ivanlovric estimationofcriticalheadwayatsmallurbanroundabout
_version_ 1724940667774304256