On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data

Detecting change-points and trends are common tasks in the analysis of remote sensing data. Over the years, many different methods have been proposed for those purposes, including (modified) Mann−Kendall and Cox−Stuart tests for detecting trends; and Pettitt, Buishand range, Buis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ana F. Militino, Mehdi Moradi, M. Dolores Ugarte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/6/1008
id doaj-93bdf6b709564bd7a6286dea2a1d3b8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93bdf6b709564bd7a6286dea2a1d3b8c2020-11-25T03:10:15ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922020-03-01126100810.3390/rs12061008rs12061008On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing DataAna F. Militino0Mehdi Moradi1M. Dolores Ugarte2Department of Statistics, Computer Science and Mathematics, Public University of Navarre, 31006 Pamplona, SpainDepartment of Statistics, Computer Science and Mathematics, Public University of Navarre, 31006 Pamplona, SpainDepartment of Statistics, Computer Science and Mathematics, Public University of Navarre, 31006 Pamplona, SpainDetecting change-points and trends are common tasks in the analysis of remote sensing data. Over the years, many different methods have been proposed for those purposes, including (modified) Mann−Kendall and Cox−Stuart tests for detecting trends; and Pettitt, Buishand range, Buishand U, standard normal homogeneity (Snh), Meanvar, structure change (Strucchange), breaks for additive season and trend (BFAST), and hierarchical divisive (E.divisive) for detecting change-points. In this paper, we describe a simulation study based on including different artificial, abrupt changes at different time-periods of image time series to assess the performances of such methods. The power of the test, type I error probability, and mean absolute error (MAE) were used as performance criteria, although MAE was only calculated for change-point detection methods. The study reveals that if the magnitude of change (or trend slope) is high, and/or the change does not occur in the first or last time-periods, the methods generally have a high power and a low MAE. However, in the presence of temporal autocorrelation, MAE raises, and the probability of introducing false positives increases noticeably. The modified versions of the Mann−Kendall method for autocorrelated data reduce/moderate its type I error probability, but this reduction comes with an important power diminution. In conclusion, taking a trade-off between the power of the test and type I error probability, we conclude that the original Mann−Kendall test is generally the preferable choice. Although Mann−Kendall is not able to identify the time-period of abrupt changes, it is more reliable than other methods when detecting the existence of such changes. Finally, we look for trend/change-points in land surface temperature (LST), day and night, via monthly MODIS images in Navarre, Spain, from January 2001 to December 2018.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/6/1008land surface temperaturemann–kendall testpower of the testspatio-temporal datatime seriestype i error probability
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ana F. Militino
Mehdi Moradi
M. Dolores Ugarte
spellingShingle Ana F. Militino
Mehdi Moradi
M. Dolores Ugarte
On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data
Remote Sensing
land surface temperature
mann–kendall test
power of the test
spatio-temporal data
time series
type i error probability
author_facet Ana F. Militino
Mehdi Moradi
M. Dolores Ugarte
author_sort Ana F. Militino
title On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data
title_short On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data
title_full On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data
title_fullStr On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data
title_full_unstemmed On the Performances of Trend and Change-Point Detection Methods for Remote Sensing Data
title_sort on the performances of trend and change-point detection methods for remote sensing data
publisher MDPI AG
series Remote Sensing
issn 2072-4292
publishDate 2020-03-01
description Detecting change-points and trends are common tasks in the analysis of remote sensing data. Over the years, many different methods have been proposed for those purposes, including (modified) Mann−Kendall and Cox−Stuart tests for detecting trends; and Pettitt, Buishand range, Buishand U, standard normal homogeneity (Snh), Meanvar, structure change (Strucchange), breaks for additive season and trend (BFAST), and hierarchical divisive (E.divisive) for detecting change-points. In this paper, we describe a simulation study based on including different artificial, abrupt changes at different time-periods of image time series to assess the performances of such methods. The power of the test, type I error probability, and mean absolute error (MAE) were used as performance criteria, although MAE was only calculated for change-point detection methods. The study reveals that if the magnitude of change (or trend slope) is high, and/or the change does not occur in the first or last time-periods, the methods generally have a high power and a low MAE. However, in the presence of temporal autocorrelation, MAE raises, and the probability of introducing false positives increases noticeably. The modified versions of the Mann−Kendall method for autocorrelated data reduce/moderate its type I error probability, but this reduction comes with an important power diminution. In conclusion, taking a trade-off between the power of the test and type I error probability, we conclude that the original Mann−Kendall test is generally the preferable choice. Although Mann−Kendall is not able to identify the time-period of abrupt changes, it is more reliable than other methods when detecting the existence of such changes. Finally, we look for trend/change-points in land surface temperature (LST), day and night, via monthly MODIS images in Navarre, Spain, from January 2001 to December 2018.
topic land surface temperature
mann–kendall test
power of the test
spatio-temporal data
time series
type i error probability
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/12/6/1008
work_keys_str_mv AT anafmilitino ontheperformancesoftrendandchangepointdetectionmethodsforremotesensingdata
AT mehdimoradi ontheperformancesoftrendandchangepointdetectionmethodsforremotesensingdata
AT mdoloresugarte ontheperformancesoftrendandchangepointdetectionmethodsforremotesensingdata
_version_ 1724659658952540160