Questioning freedom as the foundation of responsibility: criticism to the humanistic heritage of Criminal Law
<div style="text-align: justify;"><p>The conceptual and procedural framework of the Criminal Law has been built over the basics of essentialism, which means the man is free, therefore responsible of his own actions. To ponder about that assertion through the revision of the sta...
Main Author: | Andrés Santiago Beltrán Castellanos |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Spanish |
Published: |
Universidad del Atlántico
2017-05-01
|
Series: | Amauta |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://investigaciones.uniatlantico.edu.co/revistas/index.php/Amauta/article/view/1713 |
Similar Items
-
Freedom of speech and the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
by: Miryam Rodríguez-Izquierdo Serrano
Published: (2014-12-01) -
[en] THE ANTI-HUMANIST PHILOSOPHY OF MICHEL FOUCAULT: QUESTIONS ON HISTORY AND FREEDOM
by: BRUNO LORENZATTO PARREIRA DA CRUZ
Published: (2013) -
The Problem of Natural Freedom in Roman Law
by: Riccardo Cardilli
Published: (2019-07-01) -
Present and future of criminal mediation in Spanish law: is a higher degree of uncertainty even possible?
by: José Francisco Etxeberria Guridi
Published: (2019-03-01) -
Pensar para além-do-homem: crítica ao humanismo em Michel Foucault
by: Fernando Sepe
Published: (2013-12-01)