Anaesthesia Techniques for Maxillary Molars – A Questionnaire-Based Retrospective Field Survey of Dentist in Western India
Introduction: Clinicians use various anaesthesia techniques like Posterior Superior Alveolar (PSA) nerve block, buccal infiltration with or without supplemental anaesthesia like palatal and intraligamentary infiltrations for root canal treatment in maxillary molars. However there is no general c...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited
2016-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/7352/16533_CE(Ra)_F(GH)_PF1(EKAK)_PFA(AK)_PF2(PAG).pdf |
Summary: | Introduction: Clinicians use various anaesthesia techniques like
Posterior Superior Alveolar (PSA) nerve block, buccal infiltration
with or without supplemental anaesthesia like palatal and
intraligamentary infiltrations for root canal treatment in maxillary
molars. However there is no general consensus regarding which
technique is enough for performing endodontic treatment in
maxillary molars.
Aim: The aim of this questionnaire-based survey is to compare
and evaluate the various techniques used to anaesthetize the
maxillary molars and its effect on postoperative pain.
Materials and Methods: The data were obtained from 290
dental practitioners using a specially prepared questionnaire
survey conducted anonymously. The questionnaire contained
questions covering data such as years in dentistry, acquired
specialty, techniques used for anaesthetizing maxillary molars,
success of anaesthesia, and postoperative pain, etc.
Results: Buccal infilteration with supplemental anaesthesia in
the form of palatal (82%) and intra-ligamentary infilteration (88%)
show higher success rate compared to only buccal infilteration
(69%). However, intra-ligamentary infilteration group showed
highest rate (75%) of postoperative pain. General practitioners
(62% of clinicians) prefer to give both buccal and palatal
infilterations and specialists opt for only buccal infilteration (66-
74% of specialists).
Conclusion: Only buccal infilteration is sufficient during root
canal treatment of maxillary molars. Routine use of supplemental
anaesthesia in the form of palatal and intra-ligamentary
infilteration is not necessary unless patient experiences
discomfort during endodontic treatment. However, intraligamentary infilteration may lead to postoperative discomfort
in the form of pain. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2249-782X 0973-709X |