Properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practice

In this article we make the case that Research in Practice (RiP) is intrinsic to the role of the professional teacher and as such should be an ongoing (supported) entitlement for all teachers throughout their career trajectory. This is not in itself a new call; what is different is our contention th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kendall, Alex, Herrington, Margaret
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Huddersfield Press 2009-06-01
Series:Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2009.1245
id doaj-93808d30b4fd427ca1a0a568b67ffb39
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93808d30b4fd427ca1a0a568b67ffb392020-11-25T01:40:36ZengUniversity of Huddersfield PressTeaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice2049-41812040-09932009-06-0112455310.5920/till.2009.1245Properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practiceKendall, AlexHerrington, MargaretIn this article we make the case that Research in Practice (RiP) is intrinsic to the role of the professional teacher and as such should be an ongoing (supported) entitlement for all teachers throughout their career trajectory. This is not in itself a new call; what is different is our contention that the current policy context of post-compulsory education makes such demands more urgent, more purposeful and, crucially, of new pedagogical significance. We argue that the consequences of Equipping our Teachers for the Future (DfES, 2004) may be highly restrictive for teacher educators and the teachers they work with. We consider how RiP might facilitate new vantage points from the lived experience of working in the sector, and how the latter might be (re)viewed. We go on to suggest that RiP may also yield important pedagogical benefits for teachers and their communities, as well as contributing to knowledge and understanding about the sector more broadly. In conclusion we argue that teacher educators must take seriously the responsibility to nurture RiP as an everyday habit of professionalism and to give serious thought to providing spaces and places for RiP. We ask whether the new opportunities provided by the Institute for Learning framework can be exploited to support longitudinal research practices.http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2009.1245
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kendall, Alex
Herrington, Margaret
spellingShingle Kendall, Alex
Herrington, Margaret
Properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practice
Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
author_facet Kendall, Alex
Herrington, Margaret
author_sort Kendall, Alex
title Properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practice
title_short Properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practice
title_full Properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practice
title_fullStr Properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practice
title_full_unstemmed Properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practice
title_sort properly equipping our teachers for the future: re-reading research in practice as an everyday habit of professional practice
publisher University of Huddersfield Press
series Teaching in Lifelong Learning: A Journal to Inform and Improve Practice
issn 2049-4181
2040-0993
publishDate 2009-06-01
description In this article we make the case that Research in Practice (RiP) is intrinsic to the role of the professional teacher and as such should be an ongoing (supported) entitlement for all teachers throughout their career trajectory. This is not in itself a new call; what is different is our contention that the current policy context of post-compulsory education makes such demands more urgent, more purposeful and, crucially, of new pedagogical significance. We argue that the consequences of Equipping our Teachers for the Future (DfES, 2004) may be highly restrictive for teacher educators and the teachers they work with. We consider how RiP might facilitate new vantage points from the lived experience of working in the sector, and how the latter might be (re)viewed. We go on to suggest that RiP may also yield important pedagogical benefits for teachers and their communities, as well as contributing to knowledge and understanding about the sector more broadly. In conclusion we argue that teacher educators must take seriously the responsibility to nurture RiP as an everyday habit of professionalism and to give serious thought to providing spaces and places for RiP. We ask whether the new opportunities provided by the Institute for Learning framework can be exploited to support longitudinal research practices.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.5920/till.2009.1245
work_keys_str_mv AT kendallalex properlyequippingourteachersforthefuturerereadingresearchinpracticeasaneverydayhabitofprofessionalpractice
AT herringtonmargaret properlyequippingourteachersforthefuturerereadingresearchinpracticeasaneverydayhabitofprofessionalpractice
_version_ 1725044766359420928