The ʽDiverse Economies’ of Participation

This article begins to construct a theory of participation in architecture, urban design and urban planning as a range of practices undertaken across a landscape of economies that largely exists outside of the capitalist economy. These practices themselves overlap in terms of their material forms,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julia Udall, Anna Holder
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jap Sam Books 2013-06-01
Series:Footprint
Online Access:https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/770
id doaj-9378a8ecc6a940cc9557508cbd76ba8d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9378a8ecc6a940cc9557508cbd76ba8d2021-02-08T12:06:58ZengJap Sam BooksFootprint1875-15041875-14902013-06-017210.7480/footprint.7.2.770795The ʽDiverse Economies’ of ParticipationJulia UdallAnna Holder This article begins to construct a theory of participation in architecture, urban design and urban planning as a range of practices undertaken across a landscape of economies that largely exists outside of the capitalist economy. These practices themselves overlap in terms of their material forms, bodily and mental activities with the practices undertaken by labour employed to produce the built environment within the capitalist marketplace. With respect to participation, our aim in articulating practices is to move away from a discussion of levels of participation and legitimacy within individual projects and towards an understanding of the organising, productive and reproductive work that is done in participating in the production of the built environment as part of an ongoing process of social change. They proliferate through multiple instances of performance and those who undertake them act as carriers of these practices, including forms of knowhow, understanding, motivational and emotional knowledge, creating resources through these acts of performance. The article contends that participatory practices are liable to be exploited re-presented or co-opted as commodified resources and this fragility limits the socially transformative potential of participation. Drawing on J.K Gibson-Graham’s conception of ‘diverse economies’, an alternative representation is developed to recognize the landscape of practices constructing alternative economic systems, and exploring means and methods of resistance to co-option or enclosure. https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/770
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julia Udall
Anna Holder
spellingShingle Julia Udall
Anna Holder
The ʽDiverse Economies’ of Participation
Footprint
author_facet Julia Udall
Anna Holder
author_sort Julia Udall
title The ʽDiverse Economies’ of Participation
title_short The ʽDiverse Economies’ of Participation
title_full The ʽDiverse Economies’ of Participation
title_fullStr The ʽDiverse Economies’ of Participation
title_full_unstemmed The ʽDiverse Economies’ of Participation
title_sort ʽdiverse economies’ of participation
publisher Jap Sam Books
series Footprint
issn 1875-1504
1875-1490
publishDate 2013-06-01
description This article begins to construct a theory of participation in architecture, urban design and urban planning as a range of practices undertaken across a landscape of economies that largely exists outside of the capitalist economy. These practices themselves overlap in terms of their material forms, bodily and mental activities with the practices undertaken by labour employed to produce the built environment within the capitalist marketplace. With respect to participation, our aim in articulating practices is to move away from a discussion of levels of participation and legitimacy within individual projects and towards an understanding of the organising, productive and reproductive work that is done in participating in the production of the built environment as part of an ongoing process of social change. They proliferate through multiple instances of performance and those who undertake them act as carriers of these practices, including forms of knowhow, understanding, motivational and emotional knowledge, creating resources through these acts of performance. The article contends that participatory practices are liable to be exploited re-presented or co-opted as commodified resources and this fragility limits the socially transformative potential of participation. Drawing on J.K Gibson-Graham’s conception of ‘diverse economies’, an alternative representation is developed to recognize the landscape of practices constructing alternative economic systems, and exploring means and methods of resistance to co-option or enclosure.
url https://ojs-libaccp.tudelft.nl/index.php/footprint/article/view/770
work_keys_str_mv AT juliaudall theʽdiverseeconomiesofparticipation
AT annaholder theʽdiverseeconomiesofparticipation
AT juliaudall ʽdiverseeconomiesofparticipation
AT annaholder ʽdiverseeconomiesofparticipation
_version_ 1724280083104923648