Valorization of OFMSW Digestate-Derived Syngas toward Methanol, Hydrogen, or Electricity: Process Simulation and Carbon Footprint Calculation

This paper explores a possible waste-based economy transition strategy. Digestate from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) is considered, as well as a low-added value product to be properly valorized. In this regard, air gasification may be used to produce syngas. In this work, the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aristide Giuliano, Enrico Catizzone, Cesare Freda, Giacinto Cornacchia
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:Processes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9717/8/5/526
Description
Summary:This paper explores a possible waste-based economy transition strategy. Digestate from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) is considered, as well as a low-added value product to be properly valorized. In this regard, air gasification may be used to produce syngas. In this work, the production of methanol, hydrogen, or electricity from digestate-derived syngas was assessed by ChemCAD process simulation software. The process scheme of methanol production comprises the following parts: water gas shift (WGS) with carbon capture and storage units (CCS), methanol synthesis, and methanol purification. In the case of hydrogen production, after WGS-CCS, hydrogen was purified from residual nitrogen by pressure swing absorption (PSA). Finally, for electricity production, the digestate-derived syngas was used as fuel in an internal combustion engine. The main objective of this work is to compare the proposed scenarios in terms of CO<sub>2</sub> emission intensity and the effect of CO<sub>2 </sub>storage. In particular, CCS units were used for methanol or hydrogen production with the aim of obtaining high equilibrium yield toward these products. On the basis of 100 kt/year of digestate, results show that the global CO<sub>2</sub> savings were 80, 71, and 69 kt<sub>CO2eq</sub>/year for electricity, methanol, and hydrogen production, respectively. If carbon storage was considered, savings of about 105 and 99 kt<sub>CO2eq</sub>/year were achieved with methanol and hydrogen production, respectively. The proposed scenarios may provide an attractive option for transitioning into methanol or hydrogen economy of the future.
ISSN:2227-9717