Forager Polymorphism and Foraging Ecology in the Leaf-Cutting Ant, Atta colombica

I compare forager size and foraging selectivity of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica and that of its close relative Atta cephalotes. In both species, larger foragers cut fragments of greater mass and area, and at vegetation sources of greater specific density (mass/area). However, the size-range o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: James K. Wetterer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 1995-01-01
Series:Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1995/10717
id doaj-935e2579d20e4982baf66797e60a4be7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-935e2579d20e4982baf66797e60a4be72020-11-24T23:29:26ZengHindawi LimitedPsyche: A Journal of Entomology0033-26151687-74381995-01-011023-413114510.1155/1995/10717Forager Polymorphism and Foraging Ecology in the Leaf-Cutting Ant, Atta colombicaJames K. Wetterer0Center for Environmental Research and Conservation, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027, USAI compare forager size and foraging selectivity of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica and that of its close relative Atta cephalotes. In both species, larger foragers cut fragments of greater mass and area, and at vegetation sources of greater specific density (mass/area). However, the size-range of A. colombica foragers (1.5–56.8 mg) was wider than the range typical for A. cephalotes (1.4–32.1 mg). In A. colombica, the maxima workers (24–60 mg) commonly participate in foraging, making up 13% of all foragers in this study and in a previous study. In contrast, A. cephalotes maxima workers (24–100 mg) rarely forage (less than 1% of all foragers in two previous studies), but instead serve primarily as soldiers defending the nest. Thus, A. colombica maxima workers are smaller and do not appear to be so specialized as soldiers as are A. cephalotes maxima workers. The broader size-range of workers participating in foraging appears to allow A. colombica to exploit a wider range of resources than A. cephalotes, including tougher, denser vegetation and fallen fruits.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1995/10717
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author James K. Wetterer
spellingShingle James K. Wetterer
Forager Polymorphism and Foraging Ecology in the Leaf-Cutting Ant, Atta colombica
Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
author_facet James K. Wetterer
author_sort James K. Wetterer
title Forager Polymorphism and Foraging Ecology in the Leaf-Cutting Ant, Atta colombica
title_short Forager Polymorphism and Foraging Ecology in the Leaf-Cutting Ant, Atta colombica
title_full Forager Polymorphism and Foraging Ecology in the Leaf-Cutting Ant, Atta colombica
title_fullStr Forager Polymorphism and Foraging Ecology in the Leaf-Cutting Ant, Atta colombica
title_full_unstemmed Forager Polymorphism and Foraging Ecology in the Leaf-Cutting Ant, Atta colombica
title_sort forager polymorphism and foraging ecology in the leaf-cutting ant, atta colombica
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Psyche: A Journal of Entomology
issn 0033-2615
1687-7438
publishDate 1995-01-01
description I compare forager size and foraging selectivity of the leaf-cutting ant Atta colombica and that of its close relative Atta cephalotes. In both species, larger foragers cut fragments of greater mass and area, and at vegetation sources of greater specific density (mass/area). However, the size-range of A. colombica foragers (1.5–56.8 mg) was wider than the range typical for A. cephalotes (1.4–32.1 mg). In A. colombica, the maxima workers (24–60 mg) commonly participate in foraging, making up 13% of all foragers in this study and in a previous study. In contrast, A. cephalotes maxima workers (24–100 mg) rarely forage (less than 1% of all foragers in two previous studies), but instead serve primarily as soldiers defending the nest. Thus, A. colombica maxima workers are smaller and do not appear to be so specialized as soldiers as are A. cephalotes maxima workers. The broader size-range of workers participating in foraging appears to allow A. colombica to exploit a wider range of resources than A. cephalotes, including tougher, denser vegetation and fallen fruits.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1995/10717
work_keys_str_mv AT jameskwetterer foragerpolymorphismandforagingecologyintheleafcuttingantattacolombica
_version_ 1725545728673054720