Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.
It is a classic topic of social network analysis to evaluate the importance of nodes and identify the node that takes on the role of core or bridge in a network. Because a single indicator is not sufficient to analyze multiple characteristics of a node, it is a natural solution to apply multiple ind...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4121239?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-935d231f8e5c47689842692689ec1485 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-935d231f8e5c47689842692689ec14852020-11-25T01:27:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0198e10373310.1371/journal.pone.0103733Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.Shaobin HuangTianyang LvXizhe ZhangYange YangWeimin ZhengChao WenIt is a classic topic of social network analysis to evaluate the importance of nodes and identify the node that takes on the role of core or bridge in a network. Because a single indicator is not sufficient to analyze multiple characteristics of a node, it is a natural solution to apply multiple indicators that should be selected carefully. An intuitive idea is to select some indicators with weak correlations to efficiently assess different characteristics of a node. However, this paper shows that it is much better to select the indicators with strong correlations. Because indicator correlation is based on the statistical analysis of a large number of nodes, the particularity of an important node will be outlined if its indicator relationship doesn't comply with the statistical correlation. Therefore, the paper selects the multiple indicators including degree, ego-betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality to evaluate the importance and the role of a node. The importance of a node is equal to the normalized sum of its three indicators. A candidate for core or bridge is selected from the great degree nodes or the nodes with great ego-betweenness centrality respectively. Then, the role of a candidate is determined according to the difference between its indicators' relationship with the statistical correlation of the overall network. Based on 18 real networks and 3 kinds of model networks, the experimental results show that the proposed methods perform quite well in evaluating the importance of nodes and in identifying the node role.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4121239?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Shaobin Huang Tianyang Lv Xizhe Zhang Yange Yang Weimin Zheng Chao Wen |
spellingShingle |
Shaobin Huang Tianyang Lv Xizhe Zhang Yange Yang Weimin Zheng Chao Wen Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Shaobin Huang Tianyang Lv Xizhe Zhang Yange Yang Weimin Zheng Chao Wen |
author_sort |
Shaobin Huang |
title |
Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators. |
title_short |
Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators. |
title_full |
Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators. |
title_fullStr |
Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators. |
title_sort |
identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2014-01-01 |
description |
It is a classic topic of social network analysis to evaluate the importance of nodes and identify the node that takes on the role of core or bridge in a network. Because a single indicator is not sufficient to analyze multiple characteristics of a node, it is a natural solution to apply multiple indicators that should be selected carefully. An intuitive idea is to select some indicators with weak correlations to efficiently assess different characteristics of a node. However, this paper shows that it is much better to select the indicators with strong correlations. Because indicator correlation is based on the statistical analysis of a large number of nodes, the particularity of an important node will be outlined if its indicator relationship doesn't comply with the statistical correlation. Therefore, the paper selects the multiple indicators including degree, ego-betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality to evaluate the importance and the role of a node. The importance of a node is equal to the normalized sum of its three indicators. A candidate for core or bridge is selected from the great degree nodes or the nodes with great ego-betweenness centrality respectively. Then, the role of a candidate is determined according to the difference between its indicators' relationship with the statistical correlation of the overall network. Based on 18 real networks and 3 kinds of model networks, the experimental results show that the proposed methods perform quite well in evaluating the importance of nodes and in identifying the node role. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4121239?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT shaobinhuang identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators AT tianyanglv identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators AT xizhezhang identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators AT yangeyang identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators AT weiminzheng identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators AT chaowen identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators |
_version_ |
1725103694858420224 |