Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.

It is a classic topic of social network analysis to evaluate the importance of nodes and identify the node that takes on the role of core or bridge in a network. Because a single indicator is not sufficient to analyze multiple characteristics of a node, it is a natural solution to apply multiple ind...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shaobin Huang, Tianyang Lv, Xizhe Zhang, Yange Yang, Weimin Zheng, Chao Wen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4121239?pdf=render
id doaj-935d231f8e5c47689842692689ec1485
record_format Article
spelling doaj-935d231f8e5c47689842692689ec14852020-11-25T01:27:43ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0198e10373310.1371/journal.pone.0103733Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.Shaobin HuangTianyang LvXizhe ZhangYange YangWeimin ZhengChao WenIt is a classic topic of social network analysis to evaluate the importance of nodes and identify the node that takes on the role of core or bridge in a network. Because a single indicator is not sufficient to analyze multiple characteristics of a node, it is a natural solution to apply multiple indicators that should be selected carefully. An intuitive idea is to select some indicators with weak correlations to efficiently assess different characteristics of a node. However, this paper shows that it is much better to select the indicators with strong correlations. Because indicator correlation is based on the statistical analysis of a large number of nodes, the particularity of an important node will be outlined if its indicator relationship doesn't comply with the statistical correlation. Therefore, the paper selects the multiple indicators including degree, ego-betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality to evaluate the importance and the role of a node. The importance of a node is equal to the normalized sum of its three indicators. A candidate for core or bridge is selected from the great degree nodes or the nodes with great ego-betweenness centrality respectively. Then, the role of a candidate is determined according to the difference between its indicators' relationship with the statistical correlation of the overall network. Based on 18 real networks and 3 kinds of model networks, the experimental results show that the proposed methods perform quite well in evaluating the importance of nodes and in identifying the node role.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4121239?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shaobin Huang
Tianyang Lv
Xizhe Zhang
Yange Yang
Weimin Zheng
Chao Wen
spellingShingle Shaobin Huang
Tianyang Lv
Xizhe Zhang
Yange Yang
Weimin Zheng
Chao Wen
Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Shaobin Huang
Tianyang Lv
Xizhe Zhang
Yange Yang
Weimin Zheng
Chao Wen
author_sort Shaobin Huang
title Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.
title_short Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.
title_full Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.
title_fullStr Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.
title_full_unstemmed Identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.
title_sort identifying node role in social network based on multiple indicators.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description It is a classic topic of social network analysis to evaluate the importance of nodes and identify the node that takes on the role of core or bridge in a network. Because a single indicator is not sufficient to analyze multiple characteristics of a node, it is a natural solution to apply multiple indicators that should be selected carefully. An intuitive idea is to select some indicators with weak correlations to efficiently assess different characteristics of a node. However, this paper shows that it is much better to select the indicators with strong correlations. Because indicator correlation is based on the statistical analysis of a large number of nodes, the particularity of an important node will be outlined if its indicator relationship doesn't comply with the statistical correlation. Therefore, the paper selects the multiple indicators including degree, ego-betweenness centrality and eigenvector centrality to evaluate the importance and the role of a node. The importance of a node is equal to the normalized sum of its three indicators. A candidate for core or bridge is selected from the great degree nodes or the nodes with great ego-betweenness centrality respectively. Then, the role of a candidate is determined according to the difference between its indicators' relationship with the statistical correlation of the overall network. Based on 18 real networks and 3 kinds of model networks, the experimental results show that the proposed methods perform quite well in evaluating the importance of nodes and in identifying the node role.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4121239?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT shaobinhuang identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators
AT tianyanglv identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators
AT xizhezhang identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators
AT yangeyang identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators
AT weiminzheng identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators
AT chaowen identifyingnoderoleinsocialnetworkbasedonmultipleindicators
_version_ 1725103694858420224