Regression Models for Log-Normal Data: Comparing Different Methods for Quantifying the Association between Abdominal Adiposity and Biomarkers of Inflammation and Insulin Resistance
We compared six methods for regression on log-normal heteroscedastic data with respect to the estimated associations with explanatory factors (bias and standard error) and the estimated expected outcome (bias and confidence interval). Method comparisons were based on results from a simulation study,...
Main Authors: | Sara Gustavsson, Björn Fagerberg, Gerd Sallsten, Eva M. Andersson |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-03-01
|
Series: | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/11/4/3521 |
Similar Items
-
Prognostic factors in gastric cancer using log-normal censored regression model
by: Mohammad Amin Pourhoseingholi (MSc), et al.
Published: (2009-08-01) -
Corrected score estimators in linear multivariate multiple regression models with heteroscedastic measurement errors
by: Wannaporn Junthopas, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Comparison of Different Methods for Estimating Log-normal Means
by: Tang, Qi
Published: (2014) -
A Synthetic Kinome Microarray Data Generator
by: Farhad Maleki, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Numerical Experiments Applying Simple Kriging to Intermittent and Log-Normal Data
by: Ro, Y., et al.
Published: (2022)