‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two Names

The politics of naming is shaped by broad socio-political conditions and can be studied from several angles. Adopting a cultural history perspective, this paper considers some of the inherited discourses on ‘Bhārata’ both prior to and at the time of its official equation with ‘India’ in the Constitu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Catherine Clémentin-Ojha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Centre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du Sud 2014-12-01
Series:South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/3717
id doaj-934af80129a44a2f85a14ab6f54d91cb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-934af80129a44a2f85a14ab6f54d91cb2021-02-09T13:08:32ZengCentre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du SudSouth Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal1960-60602014-12-011010.4000/samaj.3717‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two NamesCatherine Clémentin-OjhaThe politics of naming is shaped by broad socio-political conditions and can be studied from several angles. Adopting a cultural history perspective, this paper considers some of the inherited discourses on ‘Bhārata’ both prior to and at the time of its official equation with ‘India’ in the Constitution (1950). It focusses on three successive definitional moments: the Puranic definition of Bhārata; the shift to its colonial definition, when the old toponym became the ‘indigenous’ name for a budding nation exposed to the imported political and geographical conceptions of (British) India; and, lastly, the choice of the Constitutional assembly to register the nation under a dual and bilingual identity: ‘India, that is Bharat’. The paper concludes with a sample of contemporary reactions that show that this double-name formula remains a baffling subject for Indian citizens.http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/3717cultural historypolitics of namingIndian ConstitutionIndiaBharatBharata
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Catherine Clémentin-Ojha
spellingShingle Catherine Clémentin-Ojha
‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two Names
South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
cultural history
politics of naming
Indian Constitution
India
Bharat
Bharata
author_facet Catherine Clémentin-Ojha
author_sort Catherine Clémentin-Ojha
title ‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two Names
title_short ‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two Names
title_full ‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two Names
title_fullStr ‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two Names
title_full_unstemmed ‘India, that is Bharat…’: One Country, Two Names
title_sort ‘india, that is bharat…’: one country, two names
publisher Centre d’Etudes de l’Inde et de l’Asie du Sud
series South Asia Multidisciplinary Academic Journal
issn 1960-6060
publishDate 2014-12-01
description The politics of naming is shaped by broad socio-political conditions and can be studied from several angles. Adopting a cultural history perspective, this paper considers some of the inherited discourses on ‘Bhārata’ both prior to and at the time of its official equation with ‘India’ in the Constitution (1950). It focusses on three successive definitional moments: the Puranic definition of Bhārata; the shift to its colonial definition, when the old toponym became the ‘indigenous’ name for a budding nation exposed to the imported political and geographical conceptions of (British) India; and, lastly, the choice of the Constitutional assembly to register the nation under a dual and bilingual identity: ‘India, that is Bharat’. The paper concludes with a sample of contemporary reactions that show that this double-name formula remains a baffling subject for Indian citizens.
topic cultural history
politics of naming
Indian Constitution
India
Bharat
Bharata
url http://journals.openedition.org/samaj/3717
work_keys_str_mv AT catherineclementinojha indiathatisbharatonecountrytwonames
_version_ 1724276927872630784