History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency

It is a well-known fact that studies in philosophy and the social sciences in Turkey are mostly subjected to a western-centered way of producing knowledge as a result of the mod- ernization process that has proceeded for nearly two centuries and has witnessed some radical structural breaks with the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elyesa Koytak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: İlmi Etüdler Derneği 2013-12-01
Series:İnsan & Toplum
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.insanvetoplum.org/index.php/IVT/article/view/152/138
id doaj-934959bb02bf44369b63a75a5a38a075
record_format Article
spelling doaj-934959bb02bf44369b63a75a5a38a0752020-11-24T23:35:47Zengİlmi Etüdler Derneğiİnsan & Toplum2146-70992146-70992013-12-0136698510.12658/human.society.3.6.M0076History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic AgencyElyesa KoytakIt is a well-known fact that studies in philosophy and the social sciences in Turkey are mostly subjected to a western-centered way of producing knowledge as a result of the mod- ernization process that has proceeded for nearly two centuries and has witnessed some radical structural breaks with the past. Behind this institutional and discursive issue lies a question to be answered: Does any use of a “Western” produced concept, technique or institution, or, in other words, any vehicle of epistemological production hailing from “West” an imaginary historico- geographic space and time, mean categorical dependency or imitation? Taking this question as its point of departure, this article aims to show how the question of knowledge is closely related to the conception of history, and to inquire into the modernist presumptions regarding the source of legitimate knowledge as well as the Eurocentric narration of history that structur- ally imposes itself in all intellectual institutions. History and knowledge are two main issues that reveal the existential ground on which an authentic agency may constitute itself. A field of intel- lectual production peculiar to Turkey is possible only by going beyond the politically constructed representations such as “East-West” and thinking through the question of subjectivity in a non- Eurocentric sense of history.http://www.insanvetoplum.org/index.php/IVT/article/view/152/138EurocentrismConceptionof HistoryOccidentalismOttoman-Turkish ModernizationEpisteme
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elyesa Koytak
spellingShingle Elyesa Koytak
History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency
İnsan & Toplum
Eurocentrism
Conceptionof History
Occidentalism
Ottoman-Turkish Modernization
Episteme
author_facet Elyesa Koytak
author_sort Elyesa Koytak
title History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency
title_short History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency
title_full History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency
title_fullStr History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency
title_full_unstemmed History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency
title_sort history and knowledge: a way out to regain an authentic agency
publisher İlmi Etüdler Derneği
series İnsan & Toplum
issn 2146-7099
2146-7099
publishDate 2013-12-01
description It is a well-known fact that studies in philosophy and the social sciences in Turkey are mostly subjected to a western-centered way of producing knowledge as a result of the mod- ernization process that has proceeded for nearly two centuries and has witnessed some radical structural breaks with the past. Behind this institutional and discursive issue lies a question to be answered: Does any use of a “Western” produced concept, technique or institution, or, in other words, any vehicle of epistemological production hailing from “West” an imaginary historico- geographic space and time, mean categorical dependency or imitation? Taking this question as its point of departure, this article aims to show how the question of knowledge is closely related to the conception of history, and to inquire into the modernist presumptions regarding the source of legitimate knowledge as well as the Eurocentric narration of history that structur- ally imposes itself in all intellectual institutions. History and knowledge are two main issues that reveal the existential ground on which an authentic agency may constitute itself. A field of intel- lectual production peculiar to Turkey is possible only by going beyond the politically constructed representations such as “East-West” and thinking through the question of subjectivity in a non- Eurocentric sense of history.
topic Eurocentrism
Conceptionof History
Occidentalism
Ottoman-Turkish Modernization
Episteme
url http://www.insanvetoplum.org/index.php/IVT/article/view/152/138
work_keys_str_mv AT elyesakoytak historyandknowledgeawayouttoregainanauthenticagency
_version_ 1725524777545760768