History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency
It is a well-known fact that studies in philosophy and the social sciences in Turkey are mostly subjected to a western-centered way of producing knowledge as a result of the mod- ernization process that has proceeded for nearly two centuries and has witnessed some radical structural breaks with the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
İlmi Etüdler Derneği
2013-12-01
|
Series: | İnsan & Toplum |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.insanvetoplum.org/index.php/IVT/article/view/152/138 |
id |
doaj-934959bb02bf44369b63a75a5a38a075 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-934959bb02bf44369b63a75a5a38a0752020-11-24T23:35:47Zengİlmi Etüdler Derneğiİnsan & Toplum2146-70992146-70992013-12-0136698510.12658/human.society.3.6.M0076History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic AgencyElyesa KoytakIt is a well-known fact that studies in philosophy and the social sciences in Turkey are mostly subjected to a western-centered way of producing knowledge as a result of the mod- ernization process that has proceeded for nearly two centuries and has witnessed some radical structural breaks with the past. Behind this institutional and discursive issue lies a question to be answered: Does any use of a “Western” produced concept, technique or institution, or, in other words, any vehicle of epistemological production hailing from “West” an imaginary historico- geographic space and time, mean categorical dependency or imitation? Taking this question as its point of departure, this article aims to show how the question of knowledge is closely related to the conception of history, and to inquire into the modernist presumptions regarding the source of legitimate knowledge as well as the Eurocentric narration of history that structur- ally imposes itself in all intellectual institutions. History and knowledge are two main issues that reveal the existential ground on which an authentic agency may constitute itself. A field of intel- lectual production peculiar to Turkey is possible only by going beyond the politically constructed representations such as “East-West” and thinking through the question of subjectivity in a non- Eurocentric sense of history.http://www.insanvetoplum.org/index.php/IVT/article/view/152/138EurocentrismConceptionof HistoryOccidentalismOttoman-Turkish ModernizationEpisteme |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elyesa Koytak |
spellingShingle |
Elyesa Koytak History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency İnsan & Toplum Eurocentrism Conceptionof History Occidentalism Ottoman-Turkish Modernization Episteme |
author_facet |
Elyesa Koytak |
author_sort |
Elyesa Koytak |
title |
History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency |
title_short |
History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency |
title_full |
History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency |
title_fullStr |
History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency |
title_full_unstemmed |
History and Knowledge: A Way out to Regain an Authentic Agency |
title_sort |
history and knowledge: a way out to regain an authentic agency |
publisher |
İlmi Etüdler Derneği |
series |
İnsan & Toplum |
issn |
2146-7099 2146-7099 |
publishDate |
2013-12-01 |
description |
It is a well-known fact that studies in philosophy and the social sciences in Turkey are mostly subjected to a western-centered way of producing knowledge as a result of the mod- ernization process that has proceeded for nearly two centuries and has witnessed some radical structural breaks with the past. Behind this institutional and discursive issue lies a question to be answered: Does any use of a “Western” produced concept, technique or institution, or, in other words, any vehicle of epistemological production hailing from “West” an imaginary historico- geographic space and time, mean categorical dependency or imitation? Taking this question as its point of departure, this article aims to show how the question of knowledge is closely related to the conception of history, and to inquire into the modernist presumptions regarding the source of legitimate knowledge as well as the Eurocentric narration of history that structur- ally imposes itself in all intellectual institutions. History and knowledge are two main issues that reveal the existential ground on which an authentic agency may constitute itself. A field of intel- lectual production peculiar to Turkey is possible only by going beyond the politically constructed representations such as “East-West” and thinking through the question of subjectivity in a non- Eurocentric sense of history. |
topic |
Eurocentrism Conceptionof History Occidentalism Ottoman-Turkish Modernization Episteme |
url |
http://www.insanvetoplum.org/index.php/IVT/article/view/152/138 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elyesakoytak historyandknowledgeawayouttoregainanauthenticagency |
_version_ |
1725524777545760768 |