MODELING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SAVANNA ELEPHANTS IN KRUGER NATIONAL PARK: AN APPLICATION OF MULTI-SCALE GLOBELAND30 DATA

The ability of remote sensing to represent ecologically relevant features at multiple spatial scales makes it a powerful tool for studying wildlife distributions. Species of varying sizes perceive and interact with their environment at differing scales; therefore, it is important to consider the r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: W. Xu, B. Hays, R. Fayrer-Hosken, A. Presotto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2016-06-01
Series:The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
Online Access:https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B8/1327/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-1327-2016.pdf
id doaj-93233de492314beaa1ef0116e84ca727
record_format Article
spelling doaj-93233de492314beaa1ef0116e84ca7272020-11-24T23:24:32ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences1682-17502194-90342016-06-01XLI-B81327133410.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-1327-2016MODELING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SAVANNA ELEPHANTS IN KRUGER NATIONAL PARK: AN APPLICATION OF MULTI-SCALE GLOBELAND30 DATAW. Xu0B. Hays1R. Fayrer-Hosken2A. Presotto3Center for Geospatial Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USAUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USASand Diego Zoo, San Diego, CA 92101, USACenter for Geospatial Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USAThe ability of remote sensing to represent ecologically relevant features at multiple spatial scales makes it a powerful tool for studying wildlife distributions. Species of varying sizes perceive and interact with their environment at differing scales; therefore, it is important to consider the role of spatial resolution of remotely sensed data in the creation of distribution models. The release of the Globeland30 land cover classification in 2014, with its 30 m resolution, presents the opportunity to do precisely that. We created a series of Maximum Entropy distribution models for African savanna elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) using Globeland30 data analyzed at varying resolutions. We compared these with similarly re-sampled models created from the European Space Agency’s Global Land Cover Map (Globcover). These data, in combination with GIS layers of topography and distance to roads, human activity, and water, as well as elephant GPS collar data, were used with MaxEnt software to produce the final distribution models. The AUC (Area Under the Curve) scores indicated that the models created from 600 m data performed better than other spatial resolutions and that the Globeland30 models generally performed better than the Globcover models. Additionally, elevation and distance to rivers seemed to be the most important variables in our models. Our results demonstrate that Globeland30 is a valid alternative to the well-established Globcover for creating wildlife distribution models. It may even be superior for applications which require higher spatial resolution and less nuanced classifications.https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B8/1327/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-1327-2016.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author W. Xu
B. Hays
R. Fayrer-Hosken
A. Presotto
spellingShingle W. Xu
B. Hays
R. Fayrer-Hosken
A. Presotto
MODELING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SAVANNA ELEPHANTS IN KRUGER NATIONAL PARK: AN APPLICATION OF MULTI-SCALE GLOBELAND30 DATA
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
author_facet W. Xu
B. Hays
R. Fayrer-Hosken
A. Presotto
author_sort W. Xu
title MODELING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SAVANNA ELEPHANTS IN KRUGER NATIONAL PARK: AN APPLICATION OF MULTI-SCALE GLOBELAND30 DATA
title_short MODELING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SAVANNA ELEPHANTS IN KRUGER NATIONAL PARK: AN APPLICATION OF MULTI-SCALE GLOBELAND30 DATA
title_full MODELING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SAVANNA ELEPHANTS IN KRUGER NATIONAL PARK: AN APPLICATION OF MULTI-SCALE GLOBELAND30 DATA
title_fullStr MODELING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SAVANNA ELEPHANTS IN KRUGER NATIONAL PARK: AN APPLICATION OF MULTI-SCALE GLOBELAND30 DATA
title_full_unstemmed MODELING THE DISTRIBUTION OF AFRICAN SAVANNA ELEPHANTS IN KRUGER NATIONAL PARK: AN APPLICATION OF MULTI-SCALE GLOBELAND30 DATA
title_sort modeling the distribution of african savanna elephants in kruger national park: an application of multi-scale globeland30 data
publisher Copernicus Publications
series The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
issn 1682-1750
2194-9034
publishDate 2016-06-01
description The ability of remote sensing to represent ecologically relevant features at multiple spatial scales makes it a powerful tool for studying wildlife distributions. Species of varying sizes perceive and interact with their environment at differing scales; therefore, it is important to consider the role of spatial resolution of remotely sensed data in the creation of distribution models. The release of the Globeland30 land cover classification in 2014, with its 30 m resolution, presents the opportunity to do precisely that. We created a series of Maximum Entropy distribution models for African savanna elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) using Globeland30 data analyzed at varying resolutions. We compared these with similarly re-sampled models created from the European Space Agency’s Global Land Cover Map (Globcover). These data, in combination with GIS layers of topography and distance to roads, human activity, and water, as well as elephant GPS collar data, were used with MaxEnt software to produce the final distribution models. The AUC (Area Under the Curve) scores indicated that the models created from 600 m data performed better than other spatial resolutions and that the Globeland30 models generally performed better than the Globcover models. Additionally, elevation and distance to rivers seemed to be the most important variables in our models. Our results demonstrate that Globeland30 is a valid alternative to the well-established Globcover for creating wildlife distribution models. It may even be superior for applications which require higher spatial resolution and less nuanced classifications.
url https://www.int-arch-photogramm-remote-sens-spatial-inf-sci.net/XLI-B8/1327/2016/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-1327-2016.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT wxu modelingthedistributionofafricansavannaelephantsinkrugernationalparkanapplicationofmultiscaleglobeland30data
AT bhays modelingthedistributionofafricansavannaelephantsinkrugernationalparkanapplicationofmultiscaleglobeland30data
AT rfayrerhosken modelingthedistributionofafricansavannaelephantsinkrugernationalparkanapplicationofmultiscaleglobeland30data
AT apresotto modelingthedistributionofafricansavannaelephantsinkrugernationalparkanapplicationofmultiscaleglobeland30data
_version_ 1725560255570509824