Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic Technique

Twenty-six patients (30 hands) who underwent endoscopic carpal tunnel release were physically examined and asked to complete questionnaires on their symptoms, functional limitations and satisfaction. Their mean grip strength improved considerably from 17.5 kg before the operation to 31.3 kg at the f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Masato Okada, Osamu Tsubata, Sadayuki Yasumoto, Norihiko Toda, Tadami Matsumoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2000-12-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900000800205
id doaj-931991d451b94a8d9a084d164643bd49
record_format Article
spelling doaj-931991d451b94a8d9a084d164643bd492020-11-25T03:18:05ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902000-12-01810.1177/230949900000800205Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic TechniqueMasato OkadaOsamu TsubataSadayuki YasumotoNorihiko TodaTadami MatsumotoTwenty-six patients (30 hands) who underwent endoscopic carpal tunnel release were physically examined and asked to complete questionnaires on their symptoms, functional limitations and satisfaction. Their mean grip strength improved considerably from 17.5 kg before the operation to 31.3 kg at the final follow-up. Symptoms at the final follow-up were hypesthesia in 9 hands, muscle atrophy in 10, positive Tinel sign in 3, and positive Phalen sign in 1. The mean symptom severity score improved from 3.01 before the operation to 1.44 at the final follow-up and the mean functional status score improved from 3.20 to 1.54. The average times to return to activities of daily living and work were 7.3 days and 18.4 days respectively. Twenty-two of the 26 patients (85%) were satisfied. There was no injury to neurovascular structures. Arterial injuries were prevented by marking the superficial palmar arch and ulnar artery with a Doppler ultrasonic hemodrometer before surgery.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900000800205
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Masato Okada
Osamu Tsubata
Sadayuki Yasumoto
Norihiko Toda
Tadami Matsumoto
spellingShingle Masato Okada
Osamu Tsubata
Sadayuki Yasumoto
Norihiko Toda
Tadami Matsumoto
Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic Technique
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Masato Okada
Osamu Tsubata
Sadayuki Yasumoto
Norihiko Toda
Tadami Matsumoto
author_sort Masato Okada
title Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic Technique
title_short Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic Technique
title_full Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic Technique
title_fullStr Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic Technique
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Study of Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Open versus Endoscopic Technique
title_sort clinical study of surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: open versus endoscopic technique
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2000-12-01
description Twenty-six patients (30 hands) who underwent endoscopic carpal tunnel release were physically examined and asked to complete questionnaires on their symptoms, functional limitations and satisfaction. Their mean grip strength improved considerably from 17.5 kg before the operation to 31.3 kg at the final follow-up. Symptoms at the final follow-up were hypesthesia in 9 hands, muscle atrophy in 10, positive Tinel sign in 3, and positive Phalen sign in 1. The mean symptom severity score improved from 3.01 before the operation to 1.44 at the final follow-up and the mean functional status score improved from 3.20 to 1.54. The average times to return to activities of daily living and work were 7.3 days and 18.4 days respectively. Twenty-two of the 26 patients (85%) were satisfied. There was no injury to neurovascular structures. Arterial injuries were prevented by marking the superficial palmar arch and ulnar artery with a Doppler ultrasonic hemodrometer before surgery.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900000800205
work_keys_str_mv AT masatookada clinicalstudyofsurgicaltreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeopenversusendoscopictechnique
AT osamutsubata clinicalstudyofsurgicaltreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeopenversusendoscopictechnique
AT sadayukiyasumoto clinicalstudyofsurgicaltreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeopenversusendoscopictechnique
AT norihikotoda clinicalstudyofsurgicaltreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeopenversusendoscopictechnique
AT tadamimatsumoto clinicalstudyofsurgicaltreatmentofcarpaltunnelsyndromeopenversusendoscopictechnique
_version_ 1724628881623744512