Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
Introduction: Elderly patients (≥75 years) undergoing coronary angioplasty are increasing. Meta-analyses have shown the benefits of radial access which might reduce hospital stay by decreasing access site complications with associated secondary benefits, however, the population over the age of 75 ye...
Main Authors: | Dev Basu, Preet Mohinder Singh, Anubhooti Tiwari, Basavana Goudra |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Indian Heart Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483216303194 |
Similar Items
-
Coronary angiography safety between radial and femoral access
by: Osama Tayeh, et al.
Published: (2014-06-01) -
Comparison between femoral access versus radial access in primary percutaneous coronary interventions
by: Ahmed K A. G. Hassan
Published: (2021-01-01) -
Anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy in patients with left ventricular assist devices: Initial experience with 68 procedures
by: Basavana G Goudra, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01) -
Comparison of Clinical Value between Right Distal Radial Artery Access and Right Radial Artery Access in Patients Undergoing Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
by: Wen Pan, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Anesthesia for GI endoscopy in the era of COVID-19
by: Basavana Goudra, et al.
Published: (2021-01-01)