Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures

Introduction: Elderly patients (≥75 years) undergoing coronary angioplasty are increasing. Meta-analyses have shown the benefits of radial access which might reduce hospital stay by decreasing access site complications with associated secondary benefits, however, the population over the age of 75 ye...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dev Basu, Preet Mohinder Singh, Anubhooti Tiwari, Basavana Goudra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-09-01
Series:Indian Heart Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483216303194
id doaj-930026b62872414a969653df23555fd0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-930026b62872414a969653df23555fd02020-11-24T21:03:09ZengElsevierIndian Heart Journal0019-48322017-09-0169558058810.1016/j.ihj.2017.02.003Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary proceduresDev Basu0Preet Mohinder Singh1Anubhooti Tiwari2Basavana Goudra3Medstar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United StatesAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, IndiaMedstar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United StatesHospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United StatesIntroduction: Elderly patients (≥75 years) undergoing coronary angioplasty are increasing. Meta-analyses have shown the benefits of radial access which might reduce hospital stay by decreasing access site complications with associated secondary benefits, however, the population over the age of 75 years were not a large part of the cohort and may behave differently due to increased atherosclerotic burden and age-related vascular changes. In addition, complications unique to this age group such as delirium and deconditioning might occur which could have a bearing on the outcome. Methods: We searched Pubmed, SCOPUS, Medline, Dynamed, Cochrane. The search terms used were femoral and radial, femoral versus radial, radial or femoral access site, radial or femoral comparison. There were no restrictions. Results: There was a significant decrease (85%)in the incidence of access site complications in the radial group. The time to achieve ambulation was lower by 14.25 h (8.86–19.56 h). However, the incidence of crossover (in effect failure to perform catheterization by radial access) from radial to femoral was significantly higher. Radial access was associated with longer procedural times (2.75 min) and increased contrast dose however, there was no statistical difference in the fluoroscopy time between the two. Conclusions: Radial access has similar benefits in elderly patients as those under the age of 75 and may be beneficial in patients at risk of delirium or deconditioning. However, crossover rates, contrast dose and procedure time were higher. It is conceivable that as experience is gained, these rates will diminish.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483216303194Meta-analysisElderlyCoronary angiographyOutcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dev Basu
Preet Mohinder Singh
Anubhooti Tiwari
Basavana Goudra
spellingShingle Dev Basu
Preet Mohinder Singh
Anubhooti Tiwari
Basavana Goudra
Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
Indian Heart Journal
Meta-analysis
Elderly
Coronary angiography
Outcome
author_facet Dev Basu
Preet Mohinder Singh
Anubhooti Tiwari
Basavana Goudra
author_sort Dev Basu
title Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
title_short Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
title_full Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
title_fullStr Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
title_full_unstemmed Meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
title_sort meta-analysis comparing radial versus femoral approach in patients 75 years and older undergoing percutaneous coronary procedures
publisher Elsevier
series Indian Heart Journal
issn 0019-4832
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Introduction: Elderly patients (≥75 years) undergoing coronary angioplasty are increasing. Meta-analyses have shown the benefits of radial access which might reduce hospital stay by decreasing access site complications with associated secondary benefits, however, the population over the age of 75 years were not a large part of the cohort and may behave differently due to increased atherosclerotic burden and age-related vascular changes. In addition, complications unique to this age group such as delirium and deconditioning might occur which could have a bearing on the outcome. Methods: We searched Pubmed, SCOPUS, Medline, Dynamed, Cochrane. The search terms used were femoral and radial, femoral versus radial, radial or femoral access site, radial or femoral comparison. There were no restrictions. Results: There was a significant decrease (85%)in the incidence of access site complications in the radial group. The time to achieve ambulation was lower by 14.25 h (8.86–19.56 h). However, the incidence of crossover (in effect failure to perform catheterization by radial access) from radial to femoral was significantly higher. Radial access was associated with longer procedural times (2.75 min) and increased contrast dose however, there was no statistical difference in the fluoroscopy time between the two. Conclusions: Radial access has similar benefits in elderly patients as those under the age of 75 and may be beneficial in patients at risk of delirium or deconditioning. However, crossover rates, contrast dose and procedure time were higher. It is conceivable that as experience is gained, these rates will diminish.
topic Meta-analysis
Elderly
Coronary angiography
Outcome
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019483216303194
work_keys_str_mv AT devbasu metaanalysiscomparingradialversusfemoralapproachinpatients75yearsandolderundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryprocedures
AT preetmohindersingh metaanalysiscomparingradialversusfemoralapproachinpatients75yearsandolderundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryprocedures
AT anubhootitiwari metaanalysiscomparingradialversusfemoralapproachinpatients75yearsandolderundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryprocedures
AT basavanagoudra metaanalysiscomparingradialversusfemoralapproachinpatients75yearsandolderundergoingpercutaneouscoronaryprocedures
_version_ 1716774023654801408