Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology
Background:. The first phase of this study showed that ART FILLER Universal filler (AFU; FILORGA Laboratories) and ART FILLER Fine lines (AFFL) were non-inferior to JUVÉDERM Ultra 3 (Allergan) and FIRST LINES PureSense (Teoxane), respectively. The clinical benefits of AFU and AFFL on nasolabial fold...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
Online Access: | http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003274 |
id |
doaj-92f956bb7f5b4e69992bb55471c12790 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-92f956bb7f5b4e69992bb55471c127902021-01-26T08:02:41ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742020-12-01812e327410.1097/GOX.0000000000003274202012000-00022Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal TechnologyPatrick Trevidic, MD0Pierre Andre, MD1Laurent Benadiba, MD2Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD3Olivier Galatoire, MD4Philippe Garcia, MD5Anne Grand-Vincent, MD6Sylvie Boisnic, MD7Catherine Salomon, MD8Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD9From the * E2e, Rue de Sontay, Paris, France† Paris Université Laser Skin Clinic, Rue de l’Université, Paris, France‡ Office of Dr. Benadiba, Avenue Foch, Paris, France§ Private Practice, Rue de la Renaissance, Paris, France¶ La Fondation Rothschild, Rue Manin, Paris, France‖ Private Practice, Avenue de la Motte-Picquet, Paris, France** Private Practice, Avenue de Villiers, Paris, France†† GREDECO (Groupe de Recherche et d’Etude en DErmatologie et COsmétologie), Rue de la Tour, Paris, France‡‡ R&D/Innovation, Laboratoires MULTALER, Rue Ambroise Croizat, Argenteuil, France§§ Laboratoires FILL-MED, Rue de Lisbonne, Paris, France.Background:. The first phase of this study showed that ART FILLER Universal filler (AFU; FILORGA Laboratories) and ART FILLER Fine lines (AFFL) were non-inferior to JUVÉDERM Ultra 3 (Allergan) and FIRST LINES PureSense (Teoxane), respectively. The clinical benefits of AFU and AFFL on nasolabial folds and crow’s feet persisted until at least Day 180. This article reports results from an open-label extension phase that assessed the tolerability and efficacy of AFU and AFFL for up to 18 months based on clinical evaluation and ultrasound high-frequency imaging. Methods:. Eligible subjects were enrolled at D180 and assessed on D270, D360, and D540. The primary outcome measured was local tolerability. Secondary outcomes measured included: proportion of subjects in whom the severity of nasolabial folds and crow’s feet remained at least 1 point below the baseline measurement (Lemperle scale); general safety; Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores by subjects and investigators; wrinkle volumes; and skin thickness by high-frequency ultrasound. Results:. Adverse events were consistent with the product information and the initial study. No serious adverse events were recorded. In exploratory analyses, wrinkle correction with AFU and AFFL is sustained for at least 18 months: 48.4% and 98.3% of subjects respectively still showed at least a 1-point decrease in the mean Lemperle score compared with the baseline. The benefits were sustained irrespective of whether subjects received additional injections. Modifications in wrinkle volume and skin thickness at D540 were statistically significant compared with the baseline. Conclusion:. AFU and AFFL were well tolerated and, in exploratory analyses, showed a sustained efficacy for at least 18 months.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003274 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Patrick Trevidic, MD Pierre Andre, MD Laurent Benadiba, MD Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD Olivier Galatoire, MD Philippe Garcia, MD Anne Grand-Vincent, MD Sylvie Boisnic, MD Catherine Salomon, MD Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD |
spellingShingle |
Patrick Trevidic, MD Pierre Andre, MD Laurent Benadiba, MD Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD Olivier Galatoire, MD Philippe Garcia, MD Anne Grand-Vincent, MD Sylvie Boisnic, MD Catherine Salomon, MD Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
author_facet |
Patrick Trevidic, MD Pierre Andre, MD Laurent Benadiba, MD Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD Olivier Galatoire, MD Philippe Garcia, MD Anne Grand-Vincent, MD Sylvie Boisnic, MD Catherine Salomon, MD Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD |
author_sort |
Patrick Trevidic, MD |
title |
Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology |
title_short |
Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology |
title_full |
Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology |
title_fullStr |
Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology |
title_sort |
objective 18-month comparison of the tolerability of 2 dermal fillers formulated with tri-hyal technology |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer |
series |
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open |
issn |
2169-7574 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Background:. The first phase of this study showed that ART FILLER Universal filler (AFU; FILORGA Laboratories) and ART FILLER Fine lines (AFFL) were non-inferior to JUVÉDERM Ultra 3 (Allergan) and FIRST LINES PureSense (Teoxane), respectively. The clinical benefits of AFU and AFFL on nasolabial folds and crow’s feet persisted until at least Day 180. This article reports results from an open-label extension phase that assessed the tolerability and efficacy of AFU and AFFL for up to 18 months based on clinical evaluation and ultrasound high-frequency imaging.
Methods:. Eligible subjects were enrolled at D180 and assessed on D270, D360, and D540. The primary outcome measured was local tolerability. Secondary outcomes measured included: proportion of subjects in whom the severity of nasolabial folds and crow’s feet remained at least 1 point below the baseline measurement (Lemperle scale); general safety; Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores by subjects and investigators; wrinkle volumes; and skin thickness by high-frequency ultrasound.
Results:. Adverse events were consistent with the product information and the initial study. No serious adverse events were recorded. In exploratory analyses, wrinkle correction with AFU and AFFL is sustained for at least 18 months: 48.4% and 98.3% of subjects respectively still showed at least a 1-point decrease in the mean Lemperle score compared with the baseline. The benefits were sustained irrespective of whether subjects received additional injections. Modifications in wrinkle volume and skin thickness at D540 were statistically significant compared with the baseline.
Conclusion:. AFU and AFFL were well tolerated and, in exploratory analyses, showed a sustained efficacy for at least 18 months. |
url |
http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003274 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT patricktrevidicmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT pierreandremd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT laurentbenadibamd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT jeanjacquesdeutschmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT oliviergalatoiremd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT philippegarciamd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT annegrandvincentmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT sylvieboisnicmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT catherinesalomonmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology AT ferialfanianmdphd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology |
_version_ |
1724323249009983488 |