Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology

Background:. The first phase of this study showed that ART FILLER Universal filler (AFU; FILORGA Laboratories) and ART FILLER Fine lines (AFFL) were non-inferior to JUVÉDERM Ultra 3 (Allergan) and FIRST LINES PureSense (Teoxane), respectively. The clinical benefits of AFU and AFFL on nasolabial fold...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Patrick Trevidic, MD, Pierre Andre, MD, Laurent Benadiba, MD, Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD, Olivier Galatoire, MD, Philippe Garcia, MD, Anne Grand-Vincent, MD, Sylvie Boisnic, MD, Catherine Salomon, MD, Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2020-12-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003274
id doaj-92f956bb7f5b4e69992bb55471c12790
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92f956bb7f5b4e69992bb55471c127902021-01-26T08:02:41ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742020-12-01812e327410.1097/GOX.0000000000003274202012000-00022Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal TechnologyPatrick Trevidic, MD0Pierre Andre, MD1Laurent Benadiba, MD2Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD3Olivier Galatoire, MD4Philippe Garcia, MD5Anne Grand-Vincent, MD6Sylvie Boisnic, MD7Catherine Salomon, MD8Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD9From the * E2e, Rue de Sontay, Paris, France† Paris Université Laser Skin Clinic, Rue de l’Université, Paris, France‡ Office of Dr. Benadiba, Avenue Foch, Paris, France§ Private Practice, Rue de la Renaissance, Paris, France¶ La Fondation Rothschild, Rue Manin, Paris, France‖ Private Practice, Avenue de la Motte-Picquet, Paris, France** Private Practice, Avenue de Villiers, Paris, France†† GREDECO (Groupe de Recherche et d’Etude en DErmatologie et COsmétologie), Rue de la Tour, Paris, France‡‡ R&D/Innovation, Laboratoires MULTALER, Rue Ambroise Croizat, Argenteuil, France§§ Laboratoires FILL-MED, Rue de Lisbonne, Paris, France.Background:. The first phase of this study showed that ART FILLER Universal filler (AFU; FILORGA Laboratories) and ART FILLER Fine lines (AFFL) were non-inferior to JUVÉDERM Ultra 3 (Allergan) and FIRST LINES PureSense (Teoxane), respectively. The clinical benefits of AFU and AFFL on nasolabial folds and crow’s feet persisted until at least Day 180. This article reports results from an open-label extension phase that assessed the tolerability and efficacy of AFU and AFFL for up to 18 months based on clinical evaluation and ultrasound high-frequency imaging. Methods:. Eligible subjects were enrolled at D180 and assessed on D270, D360, and D540. The primary outcome measured was local tolerability. Secondary outcomes measured included: proportion of subjects in whom the severity of nasolabial folds and crow’s feet remained at least 1 point below the baseline measurement (Lemperle scale); general safety; Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores by subjects and investigators; wrinkle volumes; and skin thickness by high-frequency ultrasound. Results:. Adverse events were consistent with the product information and the initial study. No serious adverse events were recorded. In exploratory analyses, wrinkle correction with AFU and AFFL is sustained for at least 18 months: 48.4% and 98.3% of subjects respectively still showed at least a 1-point decrease in the mean Lemperle score compared with the baseline. The benefits were sustained irrespective of whether subjects received additional injections. Modifications in wrinkle volume and skin thickness at D540 were statistically significant compared with the baseline. Conclusion:. AFU and AFFL were well tolerated and, in exploratory analyses, showed a sustained efficacy for at least 18 months.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003274
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Patrick Trevidic, MD
Pierre Andre, MD
Laurent Benadiba, MD
Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD
Olivier Galatoire, MD
Philippe Garcia, MD
Anne Grand-Vincent, MD
Sylvie Boisnic, MD
Catherine Salomon, MD
Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD
spellingShingle Patrick Trevidic, MD
Pierre Andre, MD
Laurent Benadiba, MD
Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD
Olivier Galatoire, MD
Philippe Garcia, MD
Anne Grand-Vincent, MD
Sylvie Boisnic, MD
Catherine Salomon, MD
Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD
Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Patrick Trevidic, MD
Pierre Andre, MD
Laurent Benadiba, MD
Jean-Jacques Deutsch, MD
Olivier Galatoire, MD
Philippe Garcia, MD
Anne Grand-Vincent, MD
Sylvie Boisnic, MD
Catherine Salomon, MD
Ferial Fanian, MD, PhD
author_sort Patrick Trevidic, MD
title Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology
title_short Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology
title_full Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology
title_fullStr Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology
title_full_unstemmed Objective 18-month Comparison of the Tolerability of 2 Dermal Fillers Formulated with Tri-Hyal Technology
title_sort objective 18-month comparison of the tolerability of 2 dermal fillers formulated with tri-hyal technology
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Background:. The first phase of this study showed that ART FILLER Universal filler (AFU; FILORGA Laboratories) and ART FILLER Fine lines (AFFL) were non-inferior to JUVÉDERM Ultra 3 (Allergan) and FIRST LINES PureSense (Teoxane), respectively. The clinical benefits of AFU and AFFL on nasolabial folds and crow’s feet persisted until at least Day 180. This article reports results from an open-label extension phase that assessed the tolerability and efficacy of AFU and AFFL for up to 18 months based on clinical evaluation and ultrasound high-frequency imaging. Methods:. Eligible subjects were enrolled at D180 and assessed on D270, D360, and D540. The primary outcome measured was local tolerability. Secondary outcomes measured included: proportion of subjects in whom the severity of nasolabial folds and crow’s feet remained at least 1 point below the baseline measurement (Lemperle scale); general safety; Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale scores by subjects and investigators; wrinkle volumes; and skin thickness by high-frequency ultrasound. Results:. Adverse events were consistent with the product information and the initial study. No serious adverse events were recorded. In exploratory analyses, wrinkle correction with AFU and AFFL is sustained for at least 18 months: 48.4% and 98.3% of subjects respectively still showed at least a 1-point decrease in the mean Lemperle score compared with the baseline. The benefits were sustained irrespective of whether subjects received additional injections. Modifications in wrinkle volume and skin thickness at D540 were statistically significant compared with the baseline. Conclusion:. AFU and AFFL were well tolerated and, in exploratory analyses, showed a sustained efficacy for at least 18 months.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000003274
work_keys_str_mv AT patricktrevidicmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT pierreandremd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT laurentbenadibamd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT jeanjacquesdeutschmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT oliviergalatoiremd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT philippegarciamd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT annegrandvincentmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT sylvieboisnicmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT catherinesalomonmd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
AT ferialfanianmdphd objective18monthcomparisonofthetolerabilityof2dermalfillersformulatedwithtrihyaltechnology
_version_ 1724323249009983488