Employee’s productivity at the operation of Indonesian railway

This research was done to study the effect of the physical work environment and nonphysical workplace environment on employee’s productivity. It was conducted at the Indonesian Railway Corp. operation district 8. The population consists of 250 employees and the sample was determined using Slovin’s e...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhammad Alkirom Wildan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: STIE Perbanas Surabaya 2020-06-01
Series:Indonesian Accounting Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.perbanas.ac.id/index.php/tiar/article/view/1838/pdf
id doaj-92f350e75d844dcda5a951485b71f6d6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92f350e75d844dcda5a951485b71f6d62021-02-08T09:04:34ZengSTIE Perbanas SurabayaIndonesian Accounting Review2086-38022302-822X2020-06-01101475010.14414/tiar.v10i1.1838808Employee’s productivity at the operation of Indonesian railwayMuhammad Alkirom Wildan0University of Trunojoyo Madura, Madura, East Java, IndonesiaThis research was done to study the effect of the physical work environment and nonphysical workplace environment on employee’s productivity. It was conducted at the Indonesian Railway Corp. operation district 8. The population consists of 250 employees and the sample was determined using Slovin’s equation with the size 71 employees. The data was taken using a questionnaire and analyzed using linear regression to analyze the partial and simultaneous effect of the physical work envi-ronment and nonphysical workplace environment towards employee’s productivity. Based on the statistical analysis conducted using SPSS 18, the p-Value of the physical workplace environment and nonphysical workplace environment are 0.013 and 0.036 respectively, both are less than 0.05. Thus, it indicates that the physical workplace environment and nonphysical workplace environment significantly and partially affect employee’s productivity, while the F-count is 14.831 and its p-Value is 0.000 (<0.05) indicating that physical workplace environment and non-physical workplace environment simultaneously affected employee’s productivity. The regression coefficient (R2) was 0.504 or 50.4 %. Therefore, it also shows that the physical workplace environment and non-physical workplace environment simultaneously affected employee’s productivity about 50.4%, and about 49.6% might be affected by other variables.https://journal.perbanas.ac.id/index.php/tiar/article/view/1838/pdfenvironmentnon physical
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Muhammad Alkirom Wildan
spellingShingle Muhammad Alkirom Wildan
Employee’s productivity at the operation of Indonesian railway
Indonesian Accounting Review
environment
non physical
author_facet Muhammad Alkirom Wildan
author_sort Muhammad Alkirom Wildan
title Employee’s productivity at the operation of Indonesian railway
title_short Employee’s productivity at the operation of Indonesian railway
title_full Employee’s productivity at the operation of Indonesian railway
title_fullStr Employee’s productivity at the operation of Indonesian railway
title_full_unstemmed Employee’s productivity at the operation of Indonesian railway
title_sort employee’s productivity at the operation of indonesian railway
publisher STIE Perbanas Surabaya
series Indonesian Accounting Review
issn 2086-3802
2302-822X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description This research was done to study the effect of the physical work environment and nonphysical workplace environment on employee’s productivity. It was conducted at the Indonesian Railway Corp. operation district 8. The population consists of 250 employees and the sample was determined using Slovin’s equation with the size 71 employees. The data was taken using a questionnaire and analyzed using linear regression to analyze the partial and simultaneous effect of the physical work envi-ronment and nonphysical workplace environment towards employee’s productivity. Based on the statistical analysis conducted using SPSS 18, the p-Value of the physical workplace environment and nonphysical workplace environment are 0.013 and 0.036 respectively, both are less than 0.05. Thus, it indicates that the physical workplace environment and nonphysical workplace environment significantly and partially affect employee’s productivity, while the F-count is 14.831 and its p-Value is 0.000 (<0.05) indicating that physical workplace environment and non-physical workplace environment simultaneously affected employee’s productivity. The regression coefficient (R2) was 0.504 or 50.4 %. Therefore, it also shows that the physical workplace environment and non-physical workplace environment simultaneously affected employee’s productivity about 50.4%, and about 49.6% might be affected by other variables.
topic environment
non physical
url https://journal.perbanas.ac.id/index.php/tiar/article/view/1838/pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT muhammadalkiromwildan employeesproductivityattheoperationofindonesianrailway
_version_ 1724280308595949568