Crowd Sourcing for Conservation: Web 2.0 a Powerful Tool for Biologists

The advent and adoption of Web 2.0 technologies offers a powerful approach to enhancing the capture of information in natural resource ecology, notably community knowledge of species distributions. Such information has previously been collected using, for example, postal surveys; these are typically...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: William E. Boyd, Margaret M. Pembroke, David A. Newell
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2012-05-01
Series:Future Internet
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/2/551
id doaj-92eae329f12a4f2a8f653a7853bcdfec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92eae329f12a4f2a8f653a7853bcdfec2020-11-24T21:59:52ZengMDPI AGFuture Internet1999-59032012-05-014255156210.3390/fi4020551Crowd Sourcing for Conservation: Web 2.0 a Powerful Tool for BiologistsWilliam E. BoydMargaret M. PembrokeDavid A. NewellThe advent and adoption of Web 2.0 technologies offers a powerful approach to enhancing the capture of information in natural resource ecology, notably community knowledge of species distributions. Such information has previously been collected using, for example, postal surveys; these are typically inefficient, with low response rates, high costs, and requiring respondents to be spatially literate. Here we describe an example, using the Google Maps Application Programming Interface, to discuss the opportunities such tools provide to conservation biology. Toad Tracker was created as a prototype to demonstrate the utility of this technology to document the distribution of an invasive vertebrate pest species, the cane toad, within Australia. While the technological aspects of this tool are satisfactory, manager resistance towards its use raises issues around the public nature of the technology, the collaborative (non-expert) role in data collection, and data ownership. We conclude in suggesting that, for such tools to be accepted by non-innovation adopters, work is required on both the technological aspects and, importantly, a cultural change is required to create an environment of acceptance of the shifting relationship between authority, expertise and knowledge.http://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/2/551cane toadvertebrate pestsparticipatory GISGoogle Application Programming Interfacecollaborative knowledge
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William E. Boyd
Margaret M. Pembroke
David A. Newell
spellingShingle William E. Boyd
Margaret M. Pembroke
David A. Newell
Crowd Sourcing for Conservation: Web 2.0 a Powerful Tool for Biologists
Future Internet
cane toad
vertebrate pests
participatory GIS
Google Application Programming Interface
collaborative knowledge
author_facet William E. Boyd
Margaret M. Pembroke
David A. Newell
author_sort William E. Boyd
title Crowd Sourcing for Conservation: Web 2.0 a Powerful Tool for Biologists
title_short Crowd Sourcing for Conservation: Web 2.0 a Powerful Tool for Biologists
title_full Crowd Sourcing for Conservation: Web 2.0 a Powerful Tool for Biologists
title_fullStr Crowd Sourcing for Conservation: Web 2.0 a Powerful Tool for Biologists
title_full_unstemmed Crowd Sourcing for Conservation: Web 2.0 a Powerful Tool for Biologists
title_sort crowd sourcing for conservation: web 2.0 a powerful tool for biologists
publisher MDPI AG
series Future Internet
issn 1999-5903
publishDate 2012-05-01
description The advent and adoption of Web 2.0 technologies offers a powerful approach to enhancing the capture of information in natural resource ecology, notably community knowledge of species distributions. Such information has previously been collected using, for example, postal surveys; these are typically inefficient, with low response rates, high costs, and requiring respondents to be spatially literate. Here we describe an example, using the Google Maps Application Programming Interface, to discuss the opportunities such tools provide to conservation biology. Toad Tracker was created as a prototype to demonstrate the utility of this technology to document the distribution of an invasive vertebrate pest species, the cane toad, within Australia. While the technological aspects of this tool are satisfactory, manager resistance towards its use raises issues around the public nature of the technology, the collaborative (non-expert) role in data collection, and data ownership. We conclude in suggesting that, for such tools to be accepted by non-innovation adopters, work is required on both the technological aspects and, importantly, a cultural change is required to create an environment of acceptance of the shifting relationship between authority, expertise and knowledge.
topic cane toad
vertebrate pests
participatory GIS
Google Application Programming Interface
collaborative knowledge
url http://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/4/2/551
work_keys_str_mv AT williameboyd crowdsourcingforconservationweb20apowerfultoolforbiologists
AT margaretmpembroke crowdsourcingforconservationweb20apowerfultoolforbiologists
AT davidanewell crowdsourcingforconservationweb20apowerfultoolforbiologists
_version_ 1725846830576566272