Epidemiology and health services evaluation

Objective: To discuss the application of Epidemiology in health services evaluation. Data synthesis: The contribution of Epidemiology in health services evaluation occurs mainly in the selection, construction and analysis of indicators and the assessment of performance and impact. Two basic axes gui...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dixis Figueroa Pedraza
Format: Article
Language:Portuguese
Published: Universidade de Fortaleza 2011-06-01
Series:Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.unifor.br/images/pdfs/rbps/artigo9_2011.2.pdf
id doaj-92e762991848413899c5f01331798f63
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92e762991848413899c5f01331798f632020-11-24T23:07:11ZporUniversidade de FortalezaRevista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde1806-12221806-12302011-06-01242151158Epidemiology and health services evaluationDixis Figueroa PedrazaObjective: To discuss the application of Epidemiology in health services evaluation. Data synthesis: The contribution of Epidemiology in health services evaluation occurs mainly in the selection, construction and analysis of indicators and the assessment of performance and impact. Two basic axes guide health services evaluation: the type of indicator used and the degree of inference needed to conclude whether the results are due or not to intervention.The type of indicator to be used depends, essentially, on what is being measured, the process, the outcome or both. According to the degree of causal inference, there are three types of evaluation: adequacy, plausibility and probability. This paper presents the designs of studies that can be used in the evaluation of health services according to the degree of inference. Considering the conditions in which health services are structured and proceed, the studies of adequacy and plausibility are more convenient to evaluate the performance and impact of health services. Conclusions: There are still important methodological problems that must be overcome in the impact assessment of public health interventions. These problems include the difficulty associated with randomization, obtaining control groups for confounding factors and the choice of relevant indicators of process and outcome.http://www.unifor.br/images/pdfs/rbps/artigo9_2011.2.pdfHealth ServicesepidemiologyHealth Services EpidemiologyUses of EpidemiologyHealth Services ResearchEffectiveness.
collection DOAJ
language Portuguese
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dixis Figueroa Pedraza
spellingShingle Dixis Figueroa Pedraza
Epidemiology and health services evaluation
Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
Health Services
epidemiology
Health Services Epidemiology
Uses of Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Effectiveness.
author_facet Dixis Figueroa Pedraza
author_sort Dixis Figueroa Pedraza
title Epidemiology and health services evaluation
title_short Epidemiology and health services evaluation
title_full Epidemiology and health services evaluation
title_fullStr Epidemiology and health services evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Epidemiology and health services evaluation
title_sort epidemiology and health services evaluation
publisher Universidade de Fortaleza
series Revista Brasileira em Promoção da Saúde
issn 1806-1222
1806-1230
publishDate 2011-06-01
description Objective: To discuss the application of Epidemiology in health services evaluation. Data synthesis: The contribution of Epidemiology in health services evaluation occurs mainly in the selection, construction and analysis of indicators and the assessment of performance and impact. Two basic axes guide health services evaluation: the type of indicator used and the degree of inference needed to conclude whether the results are due or not to intervention.The type of indicator to be used depends, essentially, on what is being measured, the process, the outcome or both. According to the degree of causal inference, there are three types of evaluation: adequacy, plausibility and probability. This paper presents the designs of studies that can be used in the evaluation of health services according to the degree of inference. Considering the conditions in which health services are structured and proceed, the studies of adequacy and plausibility are more convenient to evaluate the performance and impact of health services. Conclusions: There are still important methodological problems that must be overcome in the impact assessment of public health interventions. These problems include the difficulty associated with randomization, obtaining control groups for confounding factors and the choice of relevant indicators of process and outcome.
topic Health Services
epidemiology
Health Services Epidemiology
Uses of Epidemiology
Health Services Research
Effectiveness.
url http://www.unifor.br/images/pdfs/rbps/artigo9_2011.2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dixisfigueroapedraza epidemiologyandhealthservicesevaluation
_version_ 1725619609947602944