Conservation planning in an uncertain climate: Identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenarios

Abstract Conservation actors face the challenge of allocating limited resources despite uncertainty about future climate conditions. In many cases, the potential value and feasibility of proposed projects vary across climate scenarios. A key goal is to identify areas where conservation outcomes can...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sean M. Wineland, Rachel Fovargue, Ken C. Gill, Shabnam Rezapour, Thomas M. Neeson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-02-01
Series:People and Nature
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10169
id doaj-92de1f8a4c3a45eaaa655b43a149c453
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92de1f8a4c3a45eaaa655b43a149c4532021-02-03T10:42:13ZengWileyPeople and Nature2575-83142021-02-013122123510.1002/pan3.10169Conservation planning in an uncertain climate: Identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenariosSean M. Wineland0Rachel Fovargue1Ken C. Gill2Shabnam Rezapour3Thomas M. Neeson4Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Norman OK USADepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Norman OK USADepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Norman OK USAEnterprise and Logistics Engineering Florida International University Miami FL USADepartment of Geography and Environmental Sustainability University of Oklahoma Norman OK USAAbstract Conservation actors face the challenge of allocating limited resources despite uncertainty about future climate conditions. In many cases, the potential value and feasibility of proposed projects vary across climate scenarios. A key goal is to identify areas where conservation outcomes can balance both environmental and human needs. We developed a conservation prioritization framework that jointly considers the value and feasibility of candidate projects across future climate scenarios. We then applied this framework to the challenge of meeting environmental flow targets across the Red River basin of the south‐central United States. To estimate the conservation feasibility of meeting environmental flow goals in a river reach in each climate scenario, we used a basin‐wide hydrologic planning tool to quantify the reduction in societal water usage needed to meet environmental flow targets. To estimate the biodiversity value of each river reach in each climate scenario, we used climate‐driven species distribution models and species’ conservation status. We found that river reaches in the east‐central portion of the basin may be good candidates for conservation investments, because they had high biodiversity value and high sociopolitical feasibility in all future climate scenarios. In contrast, sites in the arid western reaches of the basin had high biodiversity value, but low feasibility of achieving environmental flow goals. Our framework should have broad applicability given that the value and feasibility of conservation projects vary across climate scenarios in ecosystems around the world. It may serve as a coarse filter to identify sites for more detailed analyses and could be integrated with complementarity‐based approaches to conservation planning to balance species’ representation across projects. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10169climate changeclimate uncertaintyconservation feasibilityconservation planningconservation prioritizationenvironmental flows
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sean M. Wineland
Rachel Fovargue
Ken C. Gill
Shabnam Rezapour
Thomas M. Neeson
spellingShingle Sean M. Wineland
Rachel Fovargue
Ken C. Gill
Shabnam Rezapour
Thomas M. Neeson
Conservation planning in an uncertain climate: Identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenarios
People and Nature
climate change
climate uncertainty
conservation feasibility
conservation planning
conservation prioritization
environmental flows
author_facet Sean M. Wineland
Rachel Fovargue
Ken C. Gill
Shabnam Rezapour
Thomas M. Neeson
author_sort Sean M. Wineland
title Conservation planning in an uncertain climate: Identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenarios
title_short Conservation planning in an uncertain climate: Identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenarios
title_full Conservation planning in an uncertain climate: Identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenarios
title_fullStr Conservation planning in an uncertain climate: Identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenarios
title_full_unstemmed Conservation planning in an uncertain climate: Identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenarios
title_sort conservation planning in an uncertain climate: identifying projects that remain valuable and feasible across future scenarios
publisher Wiley
series People and Nature
issn 2575-8314
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Abstract Conservation actors face the challenge of allocating limited resources despite uncertainty about future climate conditions. In many cases, the potential value and feasibility of proposed projects vary across climate scenarios. A key goal is to identify areas where conservation outcomes can balance both environmental and human needs. We developed a conservation prioritization framework that jointly considers the value and feasibility of candidate projects across future climate scenarios. We then applied this framework to the challenge of meeting environmental flow targets across the Red River basin of the south‐central United States. To estimate the conservation feasibility of meeting environmental flow goals in a river reach in each climate scenario, we used a basin‐wide hydrologic planning tool to quantify the reduction in societal water usage needed to meet environmental flow targets. To estimate the biodiversity value of each river reach in each climate scenario, we used climate‐driven species distribution models and species’ conservation status. We found that river reaches in the east‐central portion of the basin may be good candidates for conservation investments, because they had high biodiversity value and high sociopolitical feasibility in all future climate scenarios. In contrast, sites in the arid western reaches of the basin had high biodiversity value, but low feasibility of achieving environmental flow goals. Our framework should have broad applicability given that the value and feasibility of conservation projects vary across climate scenarios in ecosystems around the world. It may serve as a coarse filter to identify sites for more detailed analyses and could be integrated with complementarity‐based approaches to conservation planning to balance species’ representation across projects. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
topic climate change
climate uncertainty
conservation feasibility
conservation planning
conservation prioritization
environmental flows
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10169
work_keys_str_mv AT seanmwineland conservationplanninginanuncertainclimateidentifyingprojectsthatremainvaluableandfeasibleacrossfuturescenarios
AT rachelfovargue conservationplanninginanuncertainclimateidentifyingprojectsthatremainvaluableandfeasibleacrossfuturescenarios
AT kencgill conservationplanninginanuncertainclimateidentifyingprojectsthatremainvaluableandfeasibleacrossfuturescenarios
AT shabnamrezapour conservationplanninginanuncertainclimateidentifyingprojectsthatremainvaluableandfeasibleacrossfuturescenarios
AT thomasmneeson conservationplanninginanuncertainclimateidentifyingprojectsthatremainvaluableandfeasibleacrossfuturescenarios
_version_ 1724286825961357312