Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews
Aim: To conduct an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to summarize the ever-growing evidence on drug use during advanced life support. Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and Web of science for systematic reviews and meta-analyses report...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Resuscitation Plus |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520421000813 |
id |
doaj-92ae3452aa7345d8b88f9c27dca1838d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-92ae3452aa7345d8b88f9c27dca1838d2021-09-13T04:14:58ZengElsevierResuscitation Plus2666-52042021-09-017100156Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviewsHans Vandersmissen0Hanne Gworek1Philippe Dewolf2Marc Sabbe3Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium; Corresponding author at: Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, BelgiumAim: To conduct an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to summarize the ever-growing evidence on drug use during advanced life support. Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and Web of science for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on drug use during advanced life support from inception to March, 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed all abstracts for eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Corrected covered areas were calculated from publication citation matrices to account for potential risk of bias. Data were graphically represented using forest plots. Results: Twenty-two head-to-head drug comparisons from 47 included articles were analysed. Adrenaline significantly increases the incidence of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge, but not the incidence of neurological intact survival. Vasopressin alone or in combination with adrenaline is not superior to adrenaline alone. There is a trend favouring lidocaine over amiodarone in shockable cardiac arrest. The risk of bias assessment of included studies ranged from very low to very high and the overlap between articles was moderate to high. Conclusions: In line with the guidelines, we currently suggest that a standard dose of adrenaline should be administered during resuscitation, however, studies assessing lower doses of adrenaline are pressing. There is no rationale for the combination of vasopressin and adrenaline or vasopressin alone instead of adrenaline. In addition, lidocaine is a valuable alternative for amiodarone and maybe even preferable for shockable cardiac arrest. However more research is necessary.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520421000813Advanced Cardiac Life SupportDrug useAdrenalineAmiodaroneLidocaineOutcome |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Hans Vandersmissen Hanne Gworek Philippe Dewolf Marc Sabbe |
spellingShingle |
Hans Vandersmissen Hanne Gworek Philippe Dewolf Marc Sabbe Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews Resuscitation Plus Advanced Cardiac Life Support Drug use Adrenaline Amiodarone Lidocaine Outcome |
author_facet |
Hans Vandersmissen Hanne Gworek Philippe Dewolf Marc Sabbe |
author_sort |
Hans Vandersmissen |
title |
Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews |
title_short |
Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews |
title_full |
Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews |
title_fullStr |
Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews |
title_full_unstemmed |
Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews |
title_sort |
drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: an overview of reviews |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Resuscitation Plus |
issn |
2666-5204 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Aim: To conduct an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to summarize the ever-growing evidence on drug use during advanced life support. Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and Web of science for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on drug use during advanced life support from inception to March, 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed all abstracts for eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Corrected covered areas were calculated from publication citation matrices to account for potential risk of bias. Data were graphically represented using forest plots. Results: Twenty-two head-to-head drug comparisons from 47 included articles were analysed. Adrenaline significantly increases the incidence of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge, but not the incidence of neurological intact survival. Vasopressin alone or in combination with adrenaline is not superior to adrenaline alone. There is a trend favouring lidocaine over amiodarone in shockable cardiac arrest. The risk of bias assessment of included studies ranged from very low to very high and the overlap between articles was moderate to high. Conclusions: In line with the guidelines, we currently suggest that a standard dose of adrenaline should be administered during resuscitation, however, studies assessing lower doses of adrenaline are pressing. There is no rationale for the combination of vasopressin and adrenaline or vasopressin alone instead of adrenaline. In addition, lidocaine is a valuable alternative for amiodarone and maybe even preferable for shockable cardiac arrest. However more research is necessary. |
topic |
Advanced Cardiac Life Support Drug use Adrenaline Amiodarone Lidocaine Outcome |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520421000813 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hansvandersmissen druguseduringadultadvancedcardiaclifesupportanoverviewofreviews AT hannegworek druguseduringadultadvancedcardiaclifesupportanoverviewofreviews AT philippedewolf druguseduringadultadvancedcardiaclifesupportanoverviewofreviews AT marcsabbe druguseduringadultadvancedcardiaclifesupportanoverviewofreviews |
_version_ |
1717381522773770240 |