Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews

Aim: To conduct an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to summarize the ever-growing evidence on drug use during advanced life support. Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and Web of science for systematic reviews and meta-analyses report...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hans Vandersmissen, Hanne Gworek, Philippe Dewolf, Marc Sabbe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-09-01
Series:Resuscitation Plus
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520421000813
id doaj-92ae3452aa7345d8b88f9c27dca1838d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92ae3452aa7345d8b88f9c27dca1838d2021-09-13T04:14:58ZengElsevierResuscitation Plus2666-52042021-09-017100156Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviewsHans Vandersmissen0Hanne Gworek1Philippe Dewolf2Marc Sabbe3Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, BelgiumDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium; Corresponding author at: Herestraat 49, Leuven 3000, Belgium.Department of Emergency Medicine, University Hospitals of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium; KULeuven, Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, BelgiumAim: To conduct an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to summarize the ever-growing evidence on drug use during advanced life support. Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and Web of science for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on drug use during advanced life support from inception to March, 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed all abstracts for eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Corrected covered areas were calculated from publication citation matrices to account for potential risk of bias. Data were graphically represented using forest plots. Results: Twenty-two head-to-head drug comparisons from 47 included articles were analysed. Adrenaline significantly increases the incidence of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge, but not the incidence of neurological intact survival. Vasopressin alone or in combination with adrenaline is not superior to adrenaline alone. There is a trend favouring lidocaine over amiodarone in shockable cardiac arrest. The risk of bias assessment of included studies ranged from very low to very high and the overlap between articles was moderate to high. Conclusions: In line with the guidelines, we currently suggest that a standard dose of adrenaline should be administered during resuscitation, however, studies assessing lower doses of adrenaline are pressing. There is no rationale for the combination of vasopressin and adrenaline or vasopressin alone instead of adrenaline. In addition, lidocaine is a valuable alternative for amiodarone and maybe even preferable for shockable cardiac arrest. However more research is necessary.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520421000813Advanced Cardiac Life SupportDrug useAdrenalineAmiodaroneLidocaineOutcome
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hans Vandersmissen
Hanne Gworek
Philippe Dewolf
Marc Sabbe
spellingShingle Hans Vandersmissen
Hanne Gworek
Philippe Dewolf
Marc Sabbe
Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews
Resuscitation Plus
Advanced Cardiac Life Support
Drug use
Adrenaline
Amiodarone
Lidocaine
Outcome
author_facet Hans Vandersmissen
Hanne Gworek
Philippe Dewolf
Marc Sabbe
author_sort Hans Vandersmissen
title Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews
title_short Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews
title_full Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews
title_fullStr Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews
title_full_unstemmed Drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: An overview of reviews
title_sort drug use during adult advanced cardiac life support: an overview of reviews
publisher Elsevier
series Resuscitation Plus
issn 2666-5204
publishDate 2021-09-01
description Aim: To conduct an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to summarize the ever-growing evidence on drug use during advanced life support. Methods: We searched Embase, Medline, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and Web of science for systematic reviews and meta-analyses reporting on drug use during advanced life support from inception to March, 2020. Two reviewers independently assessed all abstracts for eligibility, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Corrected covered areas were calculated from publication citation matrices to account for potential risk of bias. Data were graphically represented using forest plots. Results: Twenty-two head-to-head drug comparisons from 47 included articles were analysed. Adrenaline significantly increases the incidence of return of spontaneous circulation and survival to hospital discharge, but not the incidence of neurological intact survival. Vasopressin alone or in combination with adrenaline is not superior to adrenaline alone. There is a trend favouring lidocaine over amiodarone in shockable cardiac arrest. The risk of bias assessment of included studies ranged from very low to very high and the overlap between articles was moderate to high. Conclusions: In line with the guidelines, we currently suggest that a standard dose of adrenaline should be administered during resuscitation, however, studies assessing lower doses of adrenaline are pressing. There is no rationale for the combination of vasopressin and adrenaline or vasopressin alone instead of adrenaline. In addition, lidocaine is a valuable alternative for amiodarone and maybe even preferable for shockable cardiac arrest. However more research is necessary.
topic Advanced Cardiac Life Support
Drug use
Adrenaline
Amiodarone
Lidocaine
Outcome
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666520421000813
work_keys_str_mv AT hansvandersmissen druguseduringadultadvancedcardiaclifesupportanoverviewofreviews
AT hannegworek druguseduringadultadvancedcardiaclifesupportanoverviewofreviews
AT philippedewolf druguseduringadultadvancedcardiaclifesupportanoverviewofreviews
AT marcsabbe druguseduringadultadvancedcardiaclifesupportanoverviewofreviews
_version_ 1717381522773770240