Cheng Fangwu and the Desire for a Science of Literature: The Addition of “Differentials” to Natsume Soseki's Theory of Literature

In the early 1920s, literary critic Cheng Fangwu argued for the existence of art for art's sake, relentlessly criticizing the Chinese literary establishment for its deterministic view of literature. Two works of criticism, namely “A Critique of 'Can chun”’ and “Poetry on the Defensive"...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tetsuya HATTORI
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The Global Institute for Japanese Studies, Korea University 2017-06-01
Series:Gwagyeong Ilboneo Munhak Yeongu
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.bcjjl.org/upload/pdf/bcjjlls-4-1-123.pdf
id doaj-92ab8b87af2342b89606c3871e1ebaa6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92ab8b87af2342b89606c3871e1ebaa62020-11-25T00:28:53ZengThe Global Institute for Japanese Studies, Korea UniversityGwagyeong Ilboneo Munhak Yeongu2383-52222635-48292017-06-01412314010.22628/bcjjl.2017.4.1.123Cheng Fangwu and the Desire for a Science of Literature: The Addition of “Differentials” to Natsume Soseki's Theory of LiteratureTetsuya HATTORI0 Keio University Graduate School Doctoral ProgramIn the early 1920s, literary critic Cheng Fangwu argued for the existence of art for art's sake, relentlessly criticizing the Chinese literary establishment for its deterministic view of literature. Two works of criticism, namely “A Critique of 'Can chun”’ and “Poetry on the Defensive" (1923), show the influence and expansion of Natsume Soseki’s Bungakuron, or Theory of Literature (1907), despite its failure to cite it by name. One such development by Cheng is the introduction of differentials (bibun), complete with mathematical formulas and graphs, into Soseki's theories. Cheng studied in Japan from 1910 to 1921, a period when Tanabe Hajime's journalistic essays focusing on the natural sciences was attracting wide readership. Tanabe also introduced the philosophical arguments of Hermann Cohen in which Cohen used differentials as a foundation for discussing ‘the nature of thinking.’ Cheng, however, used differentials to discuss the variation of emotion during the process of novel-reading. Though obvious that Cheng made use of a pseudoscientific approach to literature in order to gain influence within the Chinese literary world, his essays also exhibit a desire for a science of literature, a desire he shared with Soseki. This paper examines how texts become regarded as literary theory and the influence they carry with them across various languages and disciplines.https://www.bcjjl.org/upload/pdf/bcjjlls-4-1-123.pdfLiterary TheoryPost-colonial Tranlation StudiesPseudoscienceNew Culture MovementNeo-Kantianism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tetsuya HATTORI
spellingShingle Tetsuya HATTORI
Cheng Fangwu and the Desire for a Science of Literature: The Addition of “Differentials” to Natsume Soseki's Theory of Literature
Gwagyeong Ilboneo Munhak Yeongu
Literary Theory
Post-colonial Tranlation Studies
Pseudoscience
New Culture Movement
Neo-Kantianism
author_facet Tetsuya HATTORI
author_sort Tetsuya HATTORI
title Cheng Fangwu and the Desire for a Science of Literature: The Addition of “Differentials” to Natsume Soseki's Theory of Literature
title_short Cheng Fangwu and the Desire for a Science of Literature: The Addition of “Differentials” to Natsume Soseki's Theory of Literature
title_full Cheng Fangwu and the Desire for a Science of Literature: The Addition of “Differentials” to Natsume Soseki's Theory of Literature
title_fullStr Cheng Fangwu and the Desire for a Science of Literature: The Addition of “Differentials” to Natsume Soseki's Theory of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Cheng Fangwu and the Desire for a Science of Literature: The Addition of “Differentials” to Natsume Soseki's Theory of Literature
title_sort cheng fangwu and the desire for a science of literature: the addition of “differentials” to natsume soseki's theory of literature
publisher The Global Institute for Japanese Studies, Korea University
series Gwagyeong Ilboneo Munhak Yeongu
issn 2383-5222
2635-4829
publishDate 2017-06-01
description In the early 1920s, literary critic Cheng Fangwu argued for the existence of art for art's sake, relentlessly criticizing the Chinese literary establishment for its deterministic view of literature. Two works of criticism, namely “A Critique of 'Can chun”’ and “Poetry on the Defensive" (1923), show the influence and expansion of Natsume Soseki’s Bungakuron, or Theory of Literature (1907), despite its failure to cite it by name. One such development by Cheng is the introduction of differentials (bibun), complete with mathematical formulas and graphs, into Soseki's theories. Cheng studied in Japan from 1910 to 1921, a period when Tanabe Hajime's journalistic essays focusing on the natural sciences was attracting wide readership. Tanabe also introduced the philosophical arguments of Hermann Cohen in which Cohen used differentials as a foundation for discussing ‘the nature of thinking.’ Cheng, however, used differentials to discuss the variation of emotion during the process of novel-reading. Though obvious that Cheng made use of a pseudoscientific approach to literature in order to gain influence within the Chinese literary world, his essays also exhibit a desire for a science of literature, a desire he shared with Soseki. This paper examines how texts become regarded as literary theory and the influence they carry with them across various languages and disciplines.
topic Literary Theory
Post-colonial Tranlation Studies
Pseudoscience
New Culture Movement
Neo-Kantianism
url https://www.bcjjl.org/upload/pdf/bcjjlls-4-1-123.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT tetsuyahattori chengfangwuandthedesireforascienceofliteraturetheadditionofdifferentialstonatsumesosekistheoryofliterature
_version_ 1725333778847498240