Indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italiana

Over the years, Italian sociology has shown considerable resistance to the use of bibliometric indicators for the purpose of performance evaluation and career progression. And yet, empirical evidence suggests that such indicators somehow capture differences between academic ranks even in a professio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mario Diani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rosenberg & Sellier 2008-08-01
Series:Quaderni di Sociologia
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/qds/868
id doaj-92a14f7eb05f4d0b9a752b8e801e0476
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92a14f7eb05f4d0b9a752b8e801e04762020-11-24T21:55:59ZengRosenberg & SellierQuaderni di Sociologia0033-49522421-58482008-08-014713514610.4000/qds.868Indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italianaMario DianiOver the years, Italian sociology has shown considerable resistance to the use of bibliometric indicators for the purpose of performance evaluation and career progression. And yet, empirical evidence suggests that such indicators somehow capture differences between academic ranks even in a professional community like the Italian one, that has often been charged for indifference to scientific performance in its evaluation procedures. The analysis of different types of data sources such as Social Science Citation Index, Sociological Abstrcts and Scholar Google for faculty members in Sociology at Trento University shows strong correlations between all indicators. An analysis of professors at allranks in the disciplinary subsector General Sociology, and of full professors in all sociolog cal subsectors, based on the h-index derived from Scholar Google data only, also shows remarkable consistency in its outcomes. It is concluded that, while one should by no means refer only or even primarily to bibliometric criteria, they would still provide a useful reference point for decisions on appointments and promotions.http://journals.openedition.org/qds/868
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mario Diani
spellingShingle Mario Diani
Indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italiana
Quaderni di Sociologia
author_facet Mario Diani
author_sort Mario Diani
title Indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italiana
title_short Indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italiana
title_full Indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italiana
title_fullStr Indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italiana
title_full_unstemmed Indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italiana
title_sort indicatori bibliometrici e sociologia italiana
publisher Rosenberg & Sellier
series Quaderni di Sociologia
issn 0033-4952
2421-5848
publishDate 2008-08-01
description Over the years, Italian sociology has shown considerable resistance to the use of bibliometric indicators for the purpose of performance evaluation and career progression. And yet, empirical evidence suggests that such indicators somehow capture differences between academic ranks even in a professional community like the Italian one, that has often been charged for indifference to scientific performance in its evaluation procedures. The analysis of different types of data sources such as Social Science Citation Index, Sociological Abstrcts and Scholar Google for faculty members in Sociology at Trento University shows strong correlations between all indicators. An analysis of professors at allranks in the disciplinary subsector General Sociology, and of full professors in all sociolog cal subsectors, based on the h-index derived from Scholar Google data only, also shows remarkable consistency in its outcomes. It is concluded that, while one should by no means refer only or even primarily to bibliometric criteria, they would still provide a useful reference point for decisions on appointments and promotions.
url http://journals.openedition.org/qds/868
work_keys_str_mv AT mariodiani indicatoribibliometriciesociologiaitaliana
_version_ 1725860206806564864