The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.
In this study, we evaluate the conceptualization of encoding and retrieval processes established in previous studies that used a divided attention (DA) paradigm. These studies indicated that there were considerable detrimental effects of DA at encoding on later memory performance, but only minimal e...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767738?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-9280b89455bf4b459ed3f22ba5cc6399 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9280b89455bf4b459ed3f22ba5cc63992020-11-24T21:44:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0189e7444710.1371/journal.pone.0074447The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register.Jonathan GuezMoshe Naveh-BenjaminIn this study, we evaluate the conceptualization of encoding and retrieval processes established in previous studies that used a divided attention (DA) paradigm. These studies indicated that there were considerable detrimental effects of DA at encoding on later memory performance, but only minimal effects, if any, on divided attention at retrieval. We suggest that this asymmetry in the effects of DA on memory can be due, at least partially, to a confound between the memory phase (encoding and retrieval) and the memory requirements of the task (memory "for" encoded information versus memory "at" test). To control for this confound, we tested memory for encoded information and for retrieved information by introducing a second test that assessed memory for the retrieved information from the first test. We report the results of four experiments that use measures of memory performance, retrieval latency, and performance on the concurrent task, all of which consistently show that DA at retrieval strongly disrupts later memory for the retrieved episode, similarly to the effects of DA at encoding. We suggest that these symmetrical disruptive effects of DA at encoding and retrieval on later retrieval reflect a disruption of an episodic buffer (EB) or episodic register component (ER), rather than a failure of encoding or retrieval operations per se.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767738?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jonathan Guez Moshe Naveh-Benjamin |
spellingShingle |
Jonathan Guez Moshe Naveh-Benjamin The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jonathan Guez Moshe Naveh-Benjamin |
author_sort |
Jonathan Guez |
title |
The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register. |
title_short |
The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register. |
title_full |
The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register. |
title_fullStr |
The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register. |
title_full_unstemmed |
The asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register. |
title_sort |
asymmetrical effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes: a different view based on an interference with the episodic register. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
In this study, we evaluate the conceptualization of encoding and retrieval processes established in previous studies that used a divided attention (DA) paradigm. These studies indicated that there were considerable detrimental effects of DA at encoding on later memory performance, but only minimal effects, if any, on divided attention at retrieval. We suggest that this asymmetry in the effects of DA on memory can be due, at least partially, to a confound between the memory phase (encoding and retrieval) and the memory requirements of the task (memory "for" encoded information versus memory "at" test). To control for this confound, we tested memory for encoded information and for retrieved information by introducing a second test that assessed memory for the retrieved information from the first test. We report the results of four experiments that use measures of memory performance, retrieval latency, and performance on the concurrent task, all of which consistently show that DA at retrieval strongly disrupts later memory for the retrieved episode, similarly to the effects of DA at encoding. We suggest that these symmetrical disruptive effects of DA at encoding and retrieval on later retrieval reflect a disruption of an episodic buffer (EB) or episodic register component (ER), rather than a failure of encoding or retrieval operations per se. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3767738?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jonathanguez theasymmetricaleffectsofdividedattentiononencodingandretrievalprocessesadifferentviewbasedonaninterferencewiththeepisodicregister AT moshenavehbenjamin theasymmetricaleffectsofdividedattentiononencodingandretrievalprocessesadifferentviewbasedonaninterferencewiththeepisodicregister AT jonathanguez asymmetricaleffectsofdividedattentiononencodingandretrievalprocessesadifferentviewbasedonaninterferencewiththeepisodicregister AT moshenavehbenjamin asymmetricaleffectsofdividedattentiononencodingandretrievalprocessesadifferentviewbasedonaninterferencewiththeepisodicregister |
_version_ |
1725909603435151360 |