Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson

Critical investigations in the field of IR have connected its modes of problematization to a modern discourse on politics. In this paper, we propose to further these interrogations by investigating the role of the under-theorization of ‘periodization’ in reifying too narrow a concept of ‘modernity’...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victor Coutinho Lage, Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais 2015-12-01
Series:Carta Internacional
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/340
id doaj-927e81409627456b969b101821a1a938
record_format Article
spelling doaj-927e81409627456b969b101821a1a9382020-11-25T03:36:09ZengAssociação Brasileira de Relações InternacionaisCarta Internacional2526-90382015-12-01103597610.21530/ci.v10n3.2015.340340Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens BartelsonVictor Coutinho Lage0Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon1IRI/PUC-Rio CPDOC/FGV-RioIRI/PUC-RioCritical investigations in the field of IR have connected its modes of problematization to a modern discourse on politics. In this paper, we propose to further these interrogations by investigating the role of the under-theorization of ‘periodization’ in reifying too narrow a concept of ‘modernity’ and, therefore, constraining available avenues for interrogating international politics. We proceed through a double problematization. First, we problematize the role played by periodization in the work of Jens Bartelson and Rob Walker, pointing to the pervasiveness—and yet silence over—this practice in two important moves to open space to think beyond modern political discourse. Second, we problematize periodization as a political practice that regulates past, present, and future, highlighting its double role in both reifying specific conceptions of history and the present, and in opening space for thinking about alternative timelines and modernities. We thus argue that periodization can have an important role in breaking through the temporal and historical boundaries limiting our understandings of international politics.https://www.cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/340international relations theory–modernity–periodization–walker–bartelson
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Victor Coutinho Lage
Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon
spellingShingle Victor Coutinho Lage
Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon
Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson
Carta Internacional
international relations theory–modernity–periodization–walker–bartelson
author_facet Victor Coutinho Lage
Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon
author_sort Victor Coutinho Lage
title Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson
title_short Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson
title_full Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson
title_fullStr Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson
title_full_unstemmed Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson
title_sort periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through r.b.j. walker and jens bartelson
publisher Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais
series Carta Internacional
issn 2526-9038
publishDate 2015-12-01
description Critical investigations in the field of IR have connected its modes of problematization to a modern discourse on politics. In this paper, we propose to further these interrogations by investigating the role of the under-theorization of ‘periodization’ in reifying too narrow a concept of ‘modernity’ and, therefore, constraining available avenues for interrogating international politics. We proceed through a double problematization. First, we problematize the role played by periodization in the work of Jens Bartelson and Rob Walker, pointing to the pervasiveness—and yet silence over—this practice in two important moves to open space to think beyond modern political discourse. Second, we problematize periodization as a political practice that regulates past, present, and future, highlighting its double role in both reifying specific conceptions of history and the present, and in opening space for thinking about alternative timelines and modernities. We thus argue that periodization can have an important role in breaking through the temporal and historical boundaries limiting our understandings of international politics.
topic international relations theory–modernity–periodization–walker–bartelson
url https://www.cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/340
work_keys_str_mv AT victorcoutinholage periodizationandmodernityiesininternationalpoliticsthroughrbjwalkerandjensbartelson
AT paulohenriquedeoliveirachamon periodizationandmodernityiesininternationalpoliticsthroughrbjwalkerandjensbartelson
_version_ 1724550841575145472