Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson
Critical investigations in the field of IR have connected its modes of problematization to a modern discourse on politics. In this paper, we propose to further these interrogations by investigating the role of the under-theorization of ‘periodization’ in reifying too narrow a concept of ‘modernity’...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais
2015-12-01
|
Series: | Carta Internacional |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/340 |
id |
doaj-927e81409627456b969b101821a1a938 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-927e81409627456b969b101821a1a9382020-11-25T03:36:09ZengAssociação Brasileira de Relações InternacionaisCarta Internacional2526-90382015-12-01103597610.21530/ci.v10n3.2015.340340Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens BartelsonVictor Coutinho Lage0Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon1IRI/PUC-Rio CPDOC/FGV-RioIRI/PUC-RioCritical investigations in the field of IR have connected its modes of problematization to a modern discourse on politics. In this paper, we propose to further these interrogations by investigating the role of the under-theorization of ‘periodization’ in reifying too narrow a concept of ‘modernity’ and, therefore, constraining available avenues for interrogating international politics. We proceed through a double problematization. First, we problematize the role played by periodization in the work of Jens Bartelson and Rob Walker, pointing to the pervasiveness—and yet silence over—this practice in two important moves to open space to think beyond modern political discourse. Second, we problematize periodization as a political practice that regulates past, present, and future, highlighting its double role in both reifying specific conceptions of history and the present, and in opening space for thinking about alternative timelines and modernities. We thus argue that periodization can have an important role in breaking through the temporal and historical boundaries limiting our understandings of international politics.https://www.cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/340international relations theory–modernity–periodization–walker–bartelson |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Victor Coutinho Lage Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon |
spellingShingle |
Victor Coutinho Lage Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson Carta Internacional international relations theory–modernity–periodization–walker–bartelson |
author_facet |
Victor Coutinho Lage Paulo Henrique de Oliveira Chamon |
author_sort |
Victor Coutinho Lage |
title |
Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson |
title_short |
Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson |
title_full |
Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson |
title_fullStr |
Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson |
title_full_unstemmed |
Periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through R.B.J. Walker and Jens Bartelson |
title_sort |
periodization and modernity(ies) in international politics through r.b.j. walker and jens bartelson |
publisher |
Associação Brasileira de Relações Internacionais |
series |
Carta Internacional |
issn |
2526-9038 |
publishDate |
2015-12-01 |
description |
Critical investigations in the field of IR have connected its modes of problematization to a modern discourse on politics. In this paper, we propose to further these interrogations by investigating the role of the under-theorization of ‘periodization’ in reifying too narrow a concept of ‘modernity’ and, therefore, constraining available avenues for interrogating international politics. We proceed through a double problematization. First, we problematize the role played by periodization in the work of Jens Bartelson and Rob Walker, pointing to the pervasiveness—and yet silence over—this practice in two important moves to open space to think beyond modern political discourse. Second, we problematize periodization as a political practice that regulates past, present, and future, highlighting its double role in both reifying specific conceptions of history and the present, and in opening space for thinking about alternative timelines and modernities. We thus argue that periodization can have an important role in breaking through the temporal and historical boundaries limiting our understandings of international politics. |
topic |
international relations theory–modernity–periodization–walker–bartelson |
url |
https://www.cartainternacional.abri.org.br/Carta/article/view/340 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT victorcoutinholage periodizationandmodernityiesininternationalpoliticsthroughrbjwalkerandjensbartelson AT paulohenriquedeoliveirachamon periodizationandmodernityiesininternationalpoliticsthroughrbjwalkerandjensbartelson |
_version_ |
1724550841575145472 |