Journal policies and editors’ opinions on peer review
Peer review practices differ substantially between journals and disciplines. This study presents the results of a survey of 322 editors of journals in ecology, economics, medicine, physics and psychology. We found that 49% of the journals surveyed checked all manuscripts for plagiarism, that 61% all...
Main Authors: | Daniel G Hamilton, Hannah Fraser, Rink Hoekstra, Fiona Fidler |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
eLife Sciences Publications Ltd
2020-11-01
|
Series: | eLife |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elifesciences.org/articles/62529 |
Similar Items
-
Peer review at the beginning of the 21st century
by: Irene Hames
Published: (2014-02-01) -
Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry
by: Teixeira da Silva Jaime A., et al.
Published: (2016-12-01) -
Rejection rate and reasons for rejection after peer review: a case study of a Russian economics journal
by: Evgueniya A Balyakina, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Journal subscription expenditure of UK higher education institutions [v3; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/5lj]
by: Stuart Lawson, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01) -
Journal subscription expenditure of UK higher education institutions [v2; ref status: indexed, http://f1000r.es/4v0]
by: Stuart Lawson, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01)