CD40L Reverse Signaling Influences Dendrite Spine Morphology and Expression of PSD-95 and Rho Small GTPases

CD40-activated CD40L reverse signaling is a major physiological regulator of neural process growth from many kinds of developing neurons. Here we have investigated whether CD40L-reverse signaling also influences dendrite spine number and morphology in striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs). Golgi prep...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paulina Carriba, Sean Wyatt, Alun M. Davies
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Subjects:
Rho
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcell.2020.00254/full
id doaj-92649e03c0d1490ca73c66225ab4a080
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92649e03c0d1490ca73c66225ab4a0802020-11-25T02:41:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology2296-634X2020-04-01810.3389/fcell.2020.00254525259CD40L Reverse Signaling Influences Dendrite Spine Morphology and Expression of PSD-95 and Rho Small GTPasesPaulina CarribaSean WyattAlun M. DaviesCD40-activated CD40L reverse signaling is a major physiological regulator of neural process growth from many kinds of developing neurons. Here we have investigated whether CD40L-reverse signaling also influences dendrite spine number and morphology in striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs). Golgi preparations revealed no differences in the spine density, but because the dendrite arbors of MSNs were larger and branched in Cd40–/– mice, the total number of spines was greater in Cd40–/– mice. We also detected more mature spines compared with wild-type littermates. Western blot revealed that MSN cultures from Cd40–/– mice had significantly less PSD-95 and there were changes in RhoA/B/C and Cdc42. Immunocytochemistry revealed that PSD-95 was clustered in spines in Cd40–/– neurons compared with more diffuse labeling in Cd40+/+ neurons. Activation of CD40L-reverse signaling with CD40-Fc prevented the changes observed in Cd40–/– cultures. Our findings suggest that CD40L-reverse signaling influences dendrite spine morphology and related protein expression and distribution.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcell.2020.00254/fullCD40L reverse signalingdendritic spinesPSD-95Rho small GTPasesRhoCdc42
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paulina Carriba
Sean Wyatt
Alun M. Davies
spellingShingle Paulina Carriba
Sean Wyatt
Alun M. Davies
CD40L Reverse Signaling Influences Dendrite Spine Morphology and Expression of PSD-95 and Rho Small GTPases
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
CD40L reverse signaling
dendritic spines
PSD-95
Rho small GTPases
Rho
Cdc42
author_facet Paulina Carriba
Sean Wyatt
Alun M. Davies
author_sort Paulina Carriba
title CD40L Reverse Signaling Influences Dendrite Spine Morphology and Expression of PSD-95 and Rho Small GTPases
title_short CD40L Reverse Signaling Influences Dendrite Spine Morphology and Expression of PSD-95 and Rho Small GTPases
title_full CD40L Reverse Signaling Influences Dendrite Spine Morphology and Expression of PSD-95 and Rho Small GTPases
title_fullStr CD40L Reverse Signaling Influences Dendrite Spine Morphology and Expression of PSD-95 and Rho Small GTPases
title_full_unstemmed CD40L Reverse Signaling Influences Dendrite Spine Morphology and Expression of PSD-95 and Rho Small GTPases
title_sort cd40l reverse signaling influences dendrite spine morphology and expression of psd-95 and rho small gtpases
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
issn 2296-634X
publishDate 2020-04-01
description CD40-activated CD40L reverse signaling is a major physiological regulator of neural process growth from many kinds of developing neurons. Here we have investigated whether CD40L-reverse signaling also influences dendrite spine number and morphology in striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs). Golgi preparations revealed no differences in the spine density, but because the dendrite arbors of MSNs were larger and branched in Cd40–/– mice, the total number of spines was greater in Cd40–/– mice. We also detected more mature spines compared with wild-type littermates. Western blot revealed that MSN cultures from Cd40–/– mice had significantly less PSD-95 and there were changes in RhoA/B/C and Cdc42. Immunocytochemistry revealed that PSD-95 was clustered in spines in Cd40–/– neurons compared with more diffuse labeling in Cd40+/+ neurons. Activation of CD40L-reverse signaling with CD40-Fc prevented the changes observed in Cd40–/– cultures. Our findings suggest that CD40L-reverse signaling influences dendrite spine morphology and related protein expression and distribution.
topic CD40L reverse signaling
dendritic spines
PSD-95
Rho small GTPases
Rho
Cdc42
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fcell.2020.00254/full
work_keys_str_mv AT paulinacarriba cd40lreversesignalinginfluencesdendritespinemorphologyandexpressionofpsd95andrhosmallgtpases
AT seanwyatt cd40lreversesignalinginfluencesdendritespinemorphologyandexpressionofpsd95andrhosmallgtpases
AT alunmdavies cd40lreversesignalinginfluencesdendritespinemorphologyandexpressionofpsd95andrhosmallgtpases
_version_ 1724778857716776960