Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora

The interdisciplinary nature of linguistics often leads to similar research questions being investigated using diverse corpora. In this paper, special attention is given to two key concerns in the corpora design: spontaneity and complexity. It is shown that spontaneity and complexity are not necessa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wilson Adam, Guardiola Mathilde
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2015-01-01
Series:SHS Web of Conferences
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20152001022
id doaj-924ad29abc714d7986bd885862703e53
record_format Article
spelling doaj-924ad29abc714d7986bd885862703e532021-03-02T07:34:16ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242015-01-01200102210.1051/shsconf/20152001022shsconf_icodoc2015_01022Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corporaWilson Adam0Guardiola Mathilde1Laboratoire Parole et Langage, UMR 7309, CNRS et Aix-Marseille UniversitéLaboratoire Parole et Langage, UMR 7309, CNRS et Aix-Marseille UniversitéThe interdisciplinary nature of linguistics often leads to similar research questions being investigated using diverse corpora. In this paper, special attention is given to two key concerns in the corpora design: spontaneity and complexity. It is shown that spontaneity and complexity are not necessarily incompatible but often become the centre point of early methodological choices. These choices are here termed “non-negotiables” and it is demonstrated how these non-negotiables lead to obligations, constraints and concessions in the data collection process which shape the corpus. It is argued that the existence of different non-negotiables, influenced by different theoretical approaches, lead directly to the creation of different corpora. These different corpora then allow complementary lights to be shed on similar objects of study. Certain central theoretical concerns - spontaneity, complexity, generalisability and data co-construction - are also discussed. The paper concludes that an improvement in the description and diffusion of these decision processes would promote increased and improved interdisciplinary collaboration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20152001022
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wilson Adam
Guardiola Mathilde
spellingShingle Wilson Adam
Guardiola Mathilde
Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora
SHS Web of Conferences
author_facet Wilson Adam
Guardiola Mathilde
author_sort Wilson Adam
title Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora
title_short Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora
title_full Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora
title_fullStr Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora
title_full_unstemmed Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora
title_sort complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora
publisher EDP Sciences
series SHS Web of Conferences
issn 2261-2424
publishDate 2015-01-01
description The interdisciplinary nature of linguistics often leads to similar research questions being investigated using diverse corpora. In this paper, special attention is given to two key concerns in the corpora design: spontaneity and complexity. It is shown that spontaneity and complexity are not necessarily incompatible but often become the centre point of early methodological choices. These choices are here termed “non-negotiables” and it is demonstrated how these non-negotiables lead to obligations, constraints and concessions in the data collection process which shape the corpus. It is argued that the existence of different non-negotiables, influenced by different theoretical approaches, lead directly to the creation of different corpora. These different corpora then allow complementary lights to be shed on similar objects of study. Certain central theoretical concerns - spontaneity, complexity, generalisability and data co-construction - are also discussed. The paper concludes that an improvement in the description and diffusion of these decision processes would promote increased and improved interdisciplinary collaboration.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20152001022
work_keys_str_mv AT wilsonadam complexityversusspontaneitynonnegotiableelementsintheconstitutionoftwointeractionalcorpora
AT guardiolamathilde complexityversusspontaneitynonnegotiableelementsintheconstitutionoftwointeractionalcorpora
_version_ 1724241312991936512