Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora
The interdisciplinary nature of linguistics often leads to similar research questions being investigated using diverse corpora. In this paper, special attention is given to two key concerns in the corpora design: spontaneity and complexity. It is shown that spontaneity and complexity are not necessa...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2015-01-01
|
Series: | SHS Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20152001022 |
id |
doaj-924ad29abc714d7986bd885862703e53 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-924ad29abc714d7986bd885862703e532021-03-02T07:34:16ZengEDP SciencesSHS Web of Conferences2261-24242015-01-01200102210.1051/shsconf/20152001022shsconf_icodoc2015_01022Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corporaWilson Adam0Guardiola Mathilde1Laboratoire Parole et Langage, UMR 7309, CNRS et Aix-Marseille UniversitéLaboratoire Parole et Langage, UMR 7309, CNRS et Aix-Marseille UniversitéThe interdisciplinary nature of linguistics often leads to similar research questions being investigated using diverse corpora. In this paper, special attention is given to two key concerns in the corpora design: spontaneity and complexity. It is shown that spontaneity and complexity are not necessarily incompatible but often become the centre point of early methodological choices. These choices are here termed “non-negotiables” and it is demonstrated how these non-negotiables lead to obligations, constraints and concessions in the data collection process which shape the corpus. It is argued that the existence of different non-negotiables, influenced by different theoretical approaches, lead directly to the creation of different corpora. These different corpora then allow complementary lights to be shed on similar objects of study. Certain central theoretical concerns - spontaneity, complexity, generalisability and data co-construction - are also discussed. The paper concludes that an improvement in the description and diffusion of these decision processes would promote increased and improved interdisciplinary collaboration.http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20152001022 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Wilson Adam Guardiola Mathilde |
spellingShingle |
Wilson Adam Guardiola Mathilde Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora SHS Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Wilson Adam Guardiola Mathilde |
author_sort |
Wilson Adam |
title |
Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora |
title_short |
Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora |
title_full |
Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora |
title_fullStr |
Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora |
title_full_unstemmed |
Complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora |
title_sort |
complexity versus spontaneity?: non-negotiable elements in the constitution of two interactional corpora |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
SHS Web of Conferences |
issn |
2261-2424 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
The interdisciplinary nature of linguistics often leads to similar research questions being investigated using diverse corpora. In this paper, special attention is given to two key concerns in the corpora design: spontaneity and complexity. It is shown that spontaneity and complexity are not necessarily incompatible but often become the centre point of early methodological choices. These choices are here termed “non-negotiables” and it is demonstrated how these non-negotiables lead to obligations, constraints and concessions in the data collection process which shape the corpus. It is argued that the existence of different non-negotiables, influenced by different theoretical approaches, lead directly to the creation of different corpora. These different corpora then allow complementary lights to be shed on similar objects of study. Certain central theoretical concerns - spontaneity, complexity, generalisability and data co-construction - are also discussed. The paper concludes that an improvement in the description and diffusion of these decision processes would promote increased and improved interdisciplinary collaboration. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20152001022 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wilsonadam complexityversusspontaneitynonnegotiableelementsintheconstitutionoftwointeractionalcorpora AT guardiolamathilde complexityversusspontaneitynonnegotiableelementsintheconstitutionoftwointeractionalcorpora |
_version_ |
1724241312991936512 |