Bird Origins Anew by Alan Feduccia in The Auk, 130(1), January 2013

In Dogmatism in Science and Medicine (Bauer 2012), I mention a number of fields in which the mainstream position is dogmatic to the nth degree and constitutes a monopoly. That is accompanied by suppression of other views: Dissenters are excluded from conferences, from publishing in leading journals...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henry Bauer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SSE 2013-06-01
Series:Journal of Scientific Exploration
Online Access:http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/610
id doaj-9248b3ff60b540afa69eac1596aed543
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9248b3ff60b540afa69eac1596aed5432020-11-25T03:06:15ZengSSEJournal of Scientific Exploration0892-33102013-06-01272Bird Origins Anew by Alan Feduccia in The Auk, 130(1), January 2013Henry Bauer In Dogmatism in Science and Medicine (Bauer 2012), I mention a number of fields in which the mainstream position is dogmatic to the nth degree and constitutes a monopoly. That is accompanied by suppression of other views: Dissenters are excluded from conferences, from publishing in leading journals, and from funding of research, and they are labeled “denialists,” with pejorative association to those who deny the Holocaust (Furedi 2007). To the already long list of fields mentioned in the book, I can add the dogma described in this article, that birds are derived in a particular way from a particular line of dinosaurs. The circumstances are uncannily similar to those facing minority views concerning string theory, extinction of dinosaurs, HIV/AIDS theory, the hypothesis of human-caused global warming, etc.: "The current mantra . . . has become an unchallengeable orthodoxy: Birds are living maniraptoran theropods. . . . Those who offer contrary evidence are subjects of ridicule and no longer considered scientists. . . . Only supporting evidence will be recognized, while contradictory evidence is ignored or explained away. . . . All conclusions are based on the fact that “birds are living dinosaurs”. . . . Lack of citation has become a common but disturbing mechanism of censorship. . . . The current orthodoxy of flight origins, involving massive exaptation, stretches biological credulity and is practically non-Darwinian." http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/610
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henry Bauer
spellingShingle Henry Bauer
Bird Origins Anew by Alan Feduccia in The Auk, 130(1), January 2013
Journal of Scientific Exploration
author_facet Henry Bauer
author_sort Henry Bauer
title Bird Origins Anew by Alan Feduccia in The Auk, 130(1), January 2013
title_short Bird Origins Anew by Alan Feduccia in The Auk, 130(1), January 2013
title_full Bird Origins Anew by Alan Feduccia in The Auk, 130(1), January 2013
title_fullStr Bird Origins Anew by Alan Feduccia in The Auk, 130(1), January 2013
title_full_unstemmed Bird Origins Anew by Alan Feduccia in The Auk, 130(1), January 2013
title_sort bird origins anew by alan feduccia in the auk, 130(1), january 2013
publisher SSE
series Journal of Scientific Exploration
issn 0892-3310
publishDate 2013-06-01
description In Dogmatism in Science and Medicine (Bauer 2012), I mention a number of fields in which the mainstream position is dogmatic to the nth degree and constitutes a monopoly. That is accompanied by suppression of other views: Dissenters are excluded from conferences, from publishing in leading journals, and from funding of research, and they are labeled “denialists,” with pejorative association to those who deny the Holocaust (Furedi 2007). To the already long list of fields mentioned in the book, I can add the dogma described in this article, that birds are derived in a particular way from a particular line of dinosaurs. The circumstances are uncannily similar to those facing minority views concerning string theory, extinction of dinosaurs, HIV/AIDS theory, the hypothesis of human-caused global warming, etc.: "The current mantra . . . has become an unchallengeable orthodoxy: Birds are living maniraptoran theropods. . . . Those who offer contrary evidence are subjects of ridicule and no longer considered scientists. . . . Only supporting evidence will be recognized, while contradictory evidence is ignored or explained away. . . . All conclusions are based on the fact that “birds are living dinosaurs”. . . . Lack of citation has become a common but disturbing mechanism of censorship. . . . The current orthodoxy of flight origins, involving massive exaptation, stretches biological credulity and is practically non-Darwinian."
url http://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/610
work_keys_str_mv AT henrybauer birdoriginsanewbyalanfeducciaintheauk1301january2013
_version_ 1724674341682020352