Implementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgery

Abstract Background Prehabilitation services assist patients in preparing for surgery, yet access to these services are often limited by geographical factors. Enabling rural and regional patients to access specialist surgical prehabilitation support with the use of telehealth technology has the pote...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jamie L. Waterland, Rani Chahal, Hilmy Ismail, Catherine Sinton, Bernhard Riedel, Jill J. Francis, Linda Denehy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-05-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06437-w
id doaj-92419300cf7940d492d4752bb809d994
record_format Article
spelling doaj-92419300cf7940d492d4752bb809d9942021-05-11T14:47:08ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632021-05-0121111410.1186/s12913-021-06437-wImplementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgeryJamie L. Waterland0Rani Chahal1Hilmy Ismail2Catherine Sinton3Bernhard Riedel4Jill J. Francis5Linda Denehy6Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreDivision of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreSchool of Health Sciences, The University of MelbourneDivision of Allied Health, Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreAbstract Background Prehabilitation services assist patients in preparing for surgery, yet access to these services are often limited by geographical factors. Enabling rural and regional patients to access specialist surgical prehabilitation support with the use of telehealth technology has the potential to overcome health inequities and improve post-operative outcomes. Aim To evaluate the current and likely future impact of a telehealth preoperative education package for patients preparing for major abdominal cancer surgery. Methods A telehealth alternative to a hospital based pre-operative education session was developed and implemented at a dedicated cancer hospital. Adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective major cancer surgery were offered this telehealth alternative. Impact evaluation was conducted using the RE-AIM framework. Results To date, 35 participants have consented to participate in the study. Thirty-one participants attended the intervention; 24 (69%) residing in rural or regional areas. Twenty-four (77%) reported that if given a choice they would prefer the online session as opposed to attending the hospital in person. The majority (97%) reported they would recommend the intervention to others preparing for surgery. Session information was recalled by all 26 participants and 77% of participants reported acting on recommendations 2 weeks after the session. Lessons learnt and recommendations for providers implementing similar programs are reported. Conclusion Telehealth alternatives to hospital based pre-operative education are well received by patients preparing for major cancer surgery. We make seven recommendations to improve implementation. Further evaluation of implementation strategies alongside clinical effectiveness in future studies is essential. Trial registration ACTRN12620000096954 , 04/02/2020.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06437-wPrehabilitationTelehealthCancerPerioperativeEducationPhysiotherapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jamie L. Waterland
Rani Chahal
Hilmy Ismail
Catherine Sinton
Bernhard Riedel
Jill J. Francis
Linda Denehy
spellingShingle Jamie L. Waterland
Rani Chahal
Hilmy Ismail
Catherine Sinton
Bernhard Riedel
Jill J. Francis
Linda Denehy
Implementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgery
BMC Health Services Research
Prehabilitation
Telehealth
Cancer
Perioperative
Education
Physiotherapy
author_facet Jamie L. Waterland
Rani Chahal
Hilmy Ismail
Catherine Sinton
Bernhard Riedel
Jill J. Francis
Linda Denehy
author_sort Jamie L. Waterland
title Implementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgery
title_short Implementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgery
title_full Implementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgery
title_fullStr Implementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgery
title_full_unstemmed Implementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgery
title_sort implementing a telehealth prehabilitation education session for patients preparing for major cancer surgery
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Background Prehabilitation services assist patients in preparing for surgery, yet access to these services are often limited by geographical factors. Enabling rural and regional patients to access specialist surgical prehabilitation support with the use of telehealth technology has the potential to overcome health inequities and improve post-operative outcomes. Aim To evaluate the current and likely future impact of a telehealth preoperative education package for patients preparing for major abdominal cancer surgery. Methods A telehealth alternative to a hospital based pre-operative education session was developed and implemented at a dedicated cancer hospital. Adult patients (≥18 years) scheduled for elective major cancer surgery were offered this telehealth alternative. Impact evaluation was conducted using the RE-AIM framework. Results To date, 35 participants have consented to participate in the study. Thirty-one participants attended the intervention; 24 (69%) residing in rural or regional areas. Twenty-four (77%) reported that if given a choice they would prefer the online session as opposed to attending the hospital in person. The majority (97%) reported they would recommend the intervention to others preparing for surgery. Session information was recalled by all 26 participants and 77% of participants reported acting on recommendations 2 weeks after the session. Lessons learnt and recommendations for providers implementing similar programs are reported. Conclusion Telehealth alternatives to hospital based pre-operative education are well received by patients preparing for major cancer surgery. We make seven recommendations to improve implementation. Further evaluation of implementation strategies alongside clinical effectiveness in future studies is essential. Trial registration ACTRN12620000096954 , 04/02/2020.
topic Prehabilitation
Telehealth
Cancer
Perioperative
Education
Physiotherapy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06437-w
work_keys_str_mv AT jamielwaterland implementingatelehealthprehabilitationeducationsessionforpatientspreparingformajorcancersurgery
AT ranichahal implementingatelehealthprehabilitationeducationsessionforpatientspreparingformajorcancersurgery
AT hilmyismail implementingatelehealthprehabilitationeducationsessionforpatientspreparingformajorcancersurgery
AT catherinesinton implementingatelehealthprehabilitationeducationsessionforpatientspreparingformajorcancersurgery
AT bernhardriedel implementingatelehealthprehabilitationeducationsessionforpatientspreparingformajorcancersurgery
AT jilljfrancis implementingatelehealthprehabilitationeducationsessionforpatientspreparingformajorcancersurgery
AT lindadenehy implementingatelehealthprehabilitationeducationsessionforpatientspreparingformajorcancersurgery
_version_ 1721444026899496960