Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
Abstract Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, a...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2020-09-01
|
Series: | Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365 |
id |
doaj-922e48a693d3413dad4a0657e1e18663 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-922e48a693d3413dad4a0657e1e186632021-05-02T19:37:32ZengWileyAnnals of Gastroenterological Surgery2475-03282020-09-014549850410.1002/ags3.12365Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A reviewSouya Nunobe0Satoshi Ida1Department of Gastroenterological surgery Cancer Institute Ariake Hospital Tokyo JapanDepartment of Gastroenterological surgery Cancer Institute Ariake Hospital Tokyo JapanAbstract Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube‐like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double‐flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double‐tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected.https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365gastric cancerproximal gastrectomyreconstruction method |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Souya Nunobe Satoshi Ida |
spellingShingle |
Souya Nunobe Satoshi Ida Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery gastric cancer proximal gastrectomy reconstruction method |
author_facet |
Souya Nunobe Satoshi Ida |
author_sort |
Souya Nunobe |
title |
Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_short |
Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_full |
Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_fullStr |
Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review |
title_sort |
current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: a review |
publisher |
Wiley |
series |
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery |
issn |
2475-0328 |
publishDate |
2020-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube‐like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double‐flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double‐tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected. |
topic |
gastric cancer proximal gastrectomy reconstruction method |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT souyanunobe currentstatusofproximalgastrectomyforgastricandesophagogastricjunctionalcancerareview AT satoshiida currentstatusofproximalgastrectomyforgastricandesophagogastricjunctionalcancerareview |
_version_ |
1721488020244267008 |