Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review

Abstract Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Souya Nunobe, Satoshi Ida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365
id doaj-922e48a693d3413dad4a0657e1e18663
record_format Article
spelling doaj-922e48a693d3413dad4a0657e1e186632021-05-02T19:37:32ZengWileyAnnals of Gastroenterological Surgery2475-03282020-09-014549850410.1002/ags3.12365Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A reviewSouya Nunobe0Satoshi Ida1Department of Gastroenterological surgery Cancer Institute Ariake Hospital Tokyo JapanDepartment of Gastroenterological surgery Cancer Institute Ariake Hospital Tokyo JapanAbstract Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube‐like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double‐flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double‐tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected.https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365gastric cancerproximal gastrectomyreconstruction method
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Souya Nunobe
Satoshi Ida
spellingShingle Souya Nunobe
Satoshi Ida
Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
gastric cancer
proximal gastrectomy
reconstruction method
author_facet Souya Nunobe
Satoshi Ida
author_sort Souya Nunobe
title Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
title_short Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
title_full Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
title_fullStr Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
title_full_unstemmed Current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: A review
title_sort current status of proximal gastrectomy for gastric and esophagogastric junctional cancer: a review
publisher Wiley
series Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
issn 2475-0328
publishDate 2020-09-01
description Abstract Proximal gastrectomy (PG) is one of the function‐preserving surgical methods for the treatment of upper gastric cancer. Favorable postoperative results have been reported in comparison with total gastrectomy. However, because there are challenges, such as postoperative reflux esophagitis, anastomotic stenosis, and residual food, appropriate selection of a reconstruction method is crucial. Some methods include esophagogastric anastomosis, including simple esophagogastrostomy, tube‐like stomach esophagogastrostomy, side overlap with fundoplication by Yamashita, and double‐flap technique, and reconstruction using the small intestine, including double‐tract methods, jejunal interposition, and jejunal pouch interposition. However, standard reconstruction methods are yet to be established. PG has also been employed in early gastric cancer of the upper third of the stomach, and indications have also been extended to esophagogastric junction cancer, which has shown an increase in recent years. Although many retrospective studies have revealed the functional benefits or oncological safety of PG, the characteristics of each surgical procedure should be understood so that an appropriate reconstruction method, with a reflux prevention mechanism and minimal postoperative injury, can be selected.
topic gastric cancer
proximal gastrectomy
reconstruction method
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12365
work_keys_str_mv AT souyanunobe currentstatusofproximalgastrectomyforgastricandesophagogastricjunctionalcancerareview
AT satoshiida currentstatusofproximalgastrectomyforgastricandesophagogastricjunctionalcancerareview
_version_ 1721488020244267008