A comparative study on Co(II) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestone

Powdered nanolimestone (NLS) and limestone (LS) have been investigated as an adsorbent for the removal of cobalt from aqueous solutions. Batch experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of pH. The favorable pH for maximum cobalt adsorption was 6.8. The surface area increased in the case...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmed H. Elmorsy, Mohamed EL-Toony, Enas Al-Johani, Shamha Ghurzan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IWA Publishing 2019-12-01
Series:Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jwrd.iwaponline.com/content/9/4/339
id doaj-921c1250733b4b1ab82b36d4b5366c73
record_format Article
spelling doaj-921c1250733b4b1ab82b36d4b5366c732020-11-25T01:39:09ZengIWA PublishingJournal of Water Reuse and Desalination2220-13192408-93702019-12-019433934910.2166/wrd.2019.060060A comparative study on Co(II) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestoneAhmed H. Elmorsy0Mohamed EL-Toony1Enas Al-Johani2Shamha Ghurzan3 Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Khalid University, Tehama 900, Saudi Arabia Department of Chemistry, College of Science, King Khalid University, Tehama 900, Saudi Arabia Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Majmaah University, Majmaah 11952, Saudi Arabia Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia Powdered nanolimestone (NLS) and limestone (LS) have been investigated as an adsorbent for the removal of cobalt from aqueous solutions. Batch experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of pH. The favorable pH for maximum cobalt adsorption was 6.8. The surface area increased in the case of NLS up to 6.2 m2/g, while it was equal to 0.5 m2/g in the case of LS. The adsorption capacity calculated by the Langmuir equation was 17.1 mg/g for LS and 60.0 mg/g for NLS at pH 6.8. The adsorption capacity increased with temperature and the kinetics followed a first-order rate equation. The enthalpy change (ΔHo) was 20.8 Jmol−1 for LS and 41.6 Jmol−1 for NLS, while entropy change (ΔSo) was 33.3 JK−1 mol−1 for LS and 74.8 JK−1 mol−1 for NLS, which substantiates the endothermic and spontaneous nature of the cobalt adsorption process. All of the results suggested that the NLS is very strong and could be an excellent nano-adsorbent for cobalt contaminated water treatment more than limestone.http://jwrd.iwaponline.com/content/9/4/339adsorptioncobaltkineticsnanolimestonethermodynamic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmed H. Elmorsy
Mohamed EL-Toony
Enas Al-Johani
Shamha Ghurzan
spellingShingle Ahmed H. Elmorsy
Mohamed EL-Toony
Enas Al-Johani
Shamha Ghurzan
A comparative study on Co(II) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestone
Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
adsorption
cobalt
kinetics
nanolimestone
thermodynamic
author_facet Ahmed H. Elmorsy
Mohamed EL-Toony
Enas Al-Johani
Shamha Ghurzan
author_sort Ahmed H. Elmorsy
title A comparative study on Co(II) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestone
title_short A comparative study on Co(II) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestone
title_full A comparative study on Co(II) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestone
title_fullStr A comparative study on Co(II) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestone
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study on Co(II) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestone
title_sort comparative study on co(ii) removal capacity from water samples by sorption using limestone and nanolimestone
publisher IWA Publishing
series Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
issn 2220-1319
2408-9370
publishDate 2019-12-01
description Powdered nanolimestone (NLS) and limestone (LS) have been investigated as an adsorbent for the removal of cobalt from aqueous solutions. Batch experiments were carried out to investigate the effect of pH. The favorable pH for maximum cobalt adsorption was 6.8. The surface area increased in the case of NLS up to 6.2 m2/g, while it was equal to 0.5 m2/g in the case of LS. The adsorption capacity calculated by the Langmuir equation was 17.1 mg/g for LS and 60.0 mg/g for NLS at pH 6.8. The adsorption capacity increased with temperature and the kinetics followed a first-order rate equation. The enthalpy change (ΔHo) was 20.8 Jmol−1 for LS and 41.6 Jmol−1 for NLS, while entropy change (ΔSo) was 33.3 JK−1 mol−1 for LS and 74.8 JK−1 mol−1 for NLS, which substantiates the endothermic and spontaneous nature of the cobalt adsorption process. All of the results suggested that the NLS is very strong and could be an excellent nano-adsorbent for cobalt contaminated water treatment more than limestone.
topic adsorption
cobalt
kinetics
nanolimestone
thermodynamic
url http://jwrd.iwaponline.com/content/9/4/339
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmedhelmorsy acomparativestudyoncoiiremovalcapacityfromwatersamplesbysorptionusinglimestoneandnanolimestone
AT mohamedeltoony acomparativestudyoncoiiremovalcapacityfromwatersamplesbysorptionusinglimestoneandnanolimestone
AT enasaljohani acomparativestudyoncoiiremovalcapacityfromwatersamplesbysorptionusinglimestoneandnanolimestone
AT shamhaghurzan acomparativestudyoncoiiremovalcapacityfromwatersamplesbysorptionusinglimestoneandnanolimestone
AT ahmedhelmorsy comparativestudyoncoiiremovalcapacityfromwatersamplesbysorptionusinglimestoneandnanolimestone
AT mohamedeltoony comparativestudyoncoiiremovalcapacityfromwatersamplesbysorptionusinglimestoneandnanolimestone
AT enasaljohani comparativestudyoncoiiremovalcapacityfromwatersamplesbysorptionusinglimestoneandnanolimestone
AT shamhaghurzan comparativestudyoncoiiremovalcapacityfromwatersamplesbysorptionusinglimestoneandnanolimestone
_version_ 1725050245684920320