Mis-Measuring Our Universities: Why Global University Rankings Don’t Add Up
Draws parallels between the problematic use of GDP to evaluate economic success with the use of global university rankings to evaluate university success. Inspired by Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics, this perspective argues that the pursuit of growth as measured by such indicators creates universi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-09-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2021.680023/full |
id |
doaj-9214fc1500a54791b08f4a1317c7d4a9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9214fc1500a54791b08f4a1317c7d4a92021-09-09T15:46:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics2504-05372021-09-01610.3389/frma.2021.680023680023Mis-Measuring Our Universities: Why Global University Rankings Don’t Add UpElizabeth GaddDraws parallels between the problematic use of GDP to evaluate economic success with the use of global university rankings to evaluate university success. Inspired by Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics, this perspective argues that the pursuit of growth as measured by such indicators creates universities that ‘grow’ up the rankings rather than those which ‘thrive’ or ‘mature.’ Such growth creates academic wealth divides within and between countries, despite the direction of growth as inspired by the rankings not truly reflecting universities’ critical purpose or contribution. Highlights the incompatibility between universities’ alignment with socially responsible practices and continued engagement with socially irresponsible ranking practices. Proposes four possible ways of engendering change in the university rankings space. Concludes by calling on leaders of ‘world-leading’ universities to join together to ‘lead the world’ in challenging global university rankings, and to set their own standards for thriving and maturing universities.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2021.680023/fullglobal rankings of universitiesGDPglobal inequitiesresponsible metricshigher education institutions |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Elizabeth Gadd |
spellingShingle |
Elizabeth Gadd Mis-Measuring Our Universities: Why Global University Rankings Don’t Add Up Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics global rankings of universities GDP global inequities responsible metrics higher education institutions |
author_facet |
Elizabeth Gadd |
author_sort |
Elizabeth Gadd |
title |
Mis-Measuring Our Universities: Why Global University Rankings Don’t Add Up |
title_short |
Mis-Measuring Our Universities: Why Global University Rankings Don’t Add Up |
title_full |
Mis-Measuring Our Universities: Why Global University Rankings Don’t Add Up |
title_fullStr |
Mis-Measuring Our Universities: Why Global University Rankings Don’t Add Up |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mis-Measuring Our Universities: Why Global University Rankings Don’t Add Up |
title_sort |
mis-measuring our universities: why global university rankings don’t add up |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics |
issn |
2504-0537 |
publishDate |
2021-09-01 |
description |
Draws parallels between the problematic use of GDP to evaluate economic success with the use of global university rankings to evaluate university success. Inspired by Kate Raworth’s Doughnut Economics, this perspective argues that the pursuit of growth as measured by such indicators creates universities that ‘grow’ up the rankings rather than those which ‘thrive’ or ‘mature.’ Such growth creates academic wealth divides within and between countries, despite the direction of growth as inspired by the rankings not truly reflecting universities’ critical purpose or contribution. Highlights the incompatibility between universities’ alignment with socially responsible practices and continued engagement with socially irresponsible ranking practices. Proposes four possible ways of engendering change in the university rankings space. Concludes by calling on leaders of ‘world-leading’ universities to join together to ‘lead the world’ in challenging global university rankings, and to set their own standards for thriving and maturing universities. |
topic |
global rankings of universities GDP global inequities responsible metrics higher education institutions |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frma.2021.680023/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT elizabethgadd mismeasuringouruniversitieswhyglobaluniversityrankingsdontaddup |
_version_ |
1717759053000605696 |