Cranioplasty and Craniofacial Reconstruction: A Review of Implant Material, Manufacturing Method and Infection Risk
Analysis of current literature highlights a wide variation in reported infection risk for different materials in cranial repair. The purpose of these composite materials are to mimic natural bone and assist in restoring function (structurally and aesthetically) to the human skull. This review aims t...
Main Authors: | Jeremy Kwarcinski, Philip Boughton, Andrew Ruys, Alessandra Doolan, James van Gelder |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-03-01
|
Series: | Applied Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/7/3/276 |
Similar Items
-
Definitive cranioplasty and scalp reconstruction in recurrent dermato fibrosarcoma protuberance of scalp
by: Ankur Bhatnagar, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01) -
Efficacy of subcutaneously preserved autologous bone grafts in cranioplasty
by: Kapil Tomar, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01) -
Material of Choice in Pediatric Cranioplasty
by: Anooja Abdul Salam, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01) -
Craniofacial reconstruction with cryopreserved autograft. Case report and technique description
by: J.A. Franco-Jiménez, et al.
Published: (2018-03-01) -
State-of-Art of Standard and Innovative Materials Used in Cranioplasty
by: Valentina Siracusa, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)