success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)
Aims: To evaluate the rates of success and failure regarding the mobility of orthodontic microimplants in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 36 titanium microimplants (AbsoAnchor®, Dentos inc. Korea) inserted in 15 female patient...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | Arabic |
Published: |
University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
2011-04-01
|
Series: | Al-Rafidain Dental Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_164444_f45065441564cbf7b801cae646e783ee.html |
id |
doaj-919b4ab56a7f4532b5cc9540bddaf491 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-919b4ab56a7f4532b5cc9540bddaf4912020-11-25T03:38:24ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal 1812-12171998-03452011-04-0111313113510.33899/rden.2011.164444success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)Ahmad A AbdulmawjoodMahmood Kh AhmadZaid S TawfiqAims: To evaluate the rates of success and failure regarding the mobility of orthodontic microimplants in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 36 titanium microimplants (AbsoAnchor®, Dentos inc. Korea) inserted in 15 female patients. The mean age for the patients was 25.53 years. Microimplants of 1.2 mm in diameter and 6–10 mm in length were used. A self–drilling method was used. A small vertical stab incision and the microimplants inserted with a screwdriver. The patients were seen periodically every 3–4 weeks. A microimplant with complete absence of a clinically detectable mobility was considered as a successful one. Whereas failure was defined as a microimplant mobility within 8 months. Results and Discussion: The total success rate for microimplants for both jaws was (86.1%). Whereas a (91.7%) success rate was recorded in the upper jaw and in the lower jaw it was (75%). Despite of higher failure rates in the mandible, which may be attributed to the occlusal force, yet they remain non significantly different from those in maxilla. Conclusions: The relatively high success rates of microimplants make them an appropriate solution for providing absolute anchorage whenever being needed in orthodontic therapyhttps://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_164444_f45065441564cbf7b801cae646e783ee.htmlmicroimplantorthodontic miniscrewabsolute anchorage |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
Arabic |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ahmad A Abdulmawjood Mahmood Kh Ahmad Zaid S Tawfiq |
spellingShingle |
Ahmad A Abdulmawjood Mahmood Kh Ahmad Zaid S Tawfiq success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study) Al-Rafidain Dental Journal microimplant orthodontic miniscrew absolute anchorage |
author_facet |
Ahmad A Abdulmawjood Mahmood Kh Ahmad Zaid S Tawfiq |
author_sort |
Ahmad A Abdulmawjood |
title |
success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study) |
title_short |
success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study) |
title_full |
success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study) |
title_fullStr |
success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study) |
title_full_unstemmed |
success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study) |
title_sort |
success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (aclinical study) |
publisher |
University of Mosul, College of Dentistry |
series |
Al-Rafidain Dental Journal |
issn |
1812-1217 1998-0345 |
publishDate |
2011-04-01 |
description |
Aims: To evaluate the rates of success and failure regarding the mobility of orthodontic microimplants in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 36 titanium microimplants (AbsoAnchor®, Dentos inc. Korea) inserted in 15 female patients. The mean age for the patients was 25.53 years. Microimplants of 1.2 mm in diameter and 6–10 mm in length were used. A self–drilling method was used. A small vertical stab incision and the microimplants inserted with a screwdriver. The patients were seen periodically every 3–4 weeks. A microimplant with complete absence of a clinically
detectable mobility was considered as a successful one.
Whereas failure was defined as a microimplant mobility
within 8 months. Results and Discussion: The total success rate for microimplants for both jaws was (86.1%). Whereas a (91.7%) success rate was recorded in the upper jaw and in the lower jaw it was (75%). Despite of higher failure rates in the mandible, which may be attributed to the occlusal force, yet they remain non significantly different from those in maxilla. Conclusions: The relatively high success rates of microimplants make them an appropriate solution for providing absolute anchorage whenever being needed in orthodontic therapy |
topic |
microimplant orthodontic miniscrew absolute anchorage |
url |
https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_164444_f45065441564cbf7b801cae646e783ee.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ahmadaabdulmawjood successandfailureratesoforthodonticmicroimplantsaclinicalstudy AT mahmoodkhahmad successandfailureratesoforthodonticmicroimplantsaclinicalstudy AT zaidstawfiq successandfailureratesoforthodonticmicroimplantsaclinicalstudy |
_version_ |
1724542435854385152 |