success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)

Aims: To evaluate the rates of success and failure regarding the mobility of orthodontic microimplants in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 36 titanium microimplants (AbsoAnchor®, Dentos inc. Korea) inserted in 15 female patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ahmad A Abdulmawjood, Mahmood Kh Ahmad, Zaid S Tawfiq
Format: Article
Language:Arabic
Published: University of Mosul, College of Dentistry 2011-04-01
Series:Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_164444_f45065441564cbf7b801cae646e783ee.html
id doaj-919b4ab56a7f4532b5cc9540bddaf491
record_format Article
spelling doaj-919b4ab56a7f4532b5cc9540bddaf4912020-11-25T03:38:24ZaraUniversity of Mosul, College of DentistryAl-Rafidain Dental Journal 1812-12171998-03452011-04-0111313113510.33899/rden.2011.164444success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)Ahmad A AbdulmawjoodMahmood Kh AhmadZaid S TawfiqAims: To evaluate the rates of success and failure regarding the mobility of orthodontic microimplants in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 36 titanium microimplants (AbsoAnchor®, Dentos inc. Korea) inserted in 15 female patients. The mean age for the patients was 25.53 years. Microimplants of 1.2 mm in diameter and 6–10 mm in length were used. A self–drilling method was used. A small vertical stab incision and the microimplants inserted with a screwdriver. The patients were seen periodically every 3–4 weeks. A microimplant with complete absence of a clinically detectable mobility was considered as a successful one. Whereas failure was defined as a microimplant mobility within 8 months. Results and Discussion: The total success rate for microimplants for both jaws was (86.1%). Whereas a (91.7%) success rate was recorded in the upper jaw and in the lower jaw it was (75%). Despite of higher failure rates in the mandible, which may be attributed to the occlusal force, yet they remain non significantly different from those in maxilla. Conclusions: The relatively high success rates of microimplants make them an appropriate solution for providing absolute anchorage whenever being needed in orthodontic therapyhttps://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_164444_f45065441564cbf7b801cae646e783ee.htmlmicroimplantorthodontic miniscrewabsolute anchorage
collection DOAJ
language Arabic
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ahmad A Abdulmawjood
Mahmood Kh Ahmad
Zaid S Tawfiq
spellingShingle Ahmad A Abdulmawjood
Mahmood Kh Ahmad
Zaid S Tawfiq
success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)
Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
microimplant
orthodontic miniscrew
absolute anchorage
author_facet Ahmad A Abdulmawjood
Mahmood Kh Ahmad
Zaid S Tawfiq
author_sort Ahmad A Abdulmawjood
title success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)
title_short success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)
title_full success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)
title_fullStr success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)
title_full_unstemmed success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (Aclinical study)
title_sort success and failure rates of orthodontic microimplants (aclinical study)
publisher University of Mosul, College of Dentistry
series Al-Rafidain Dental Journal
issn 1812-1217
1998-0345
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Aims: To evaluate the rates of success and failure regarding the mobility of orthodontic microimplants in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic appliance treatment. Materials and Methods: The sample consisted of 36 titanium microimplants (AbsoAnchor®, Dentos inc. Korea) inserted in 15 female patients. The mean age for the patients was 25.53 years. Microimplants of 1.2 mm in diameter and 6–10 mm in length were used. A self–drilling method was used. A small vertical stab incision and the microimplants inserted with a screwdriver. The patients were seen periodically every 3–4 weeks. A microimplant with complete absence of a clinically detectable mobility was considered as a successful one. Whereas failure was defined as a microimplant mobility within 8 months. Results and Discussion: The total success rate for microimplants for both jaws was (86.1%). Whereas a (91.7%) success rate was recorded in the upper jaw and in the lower jaw it was (75%). Despite of higher failure rates in the mandible, which may be attributed to the occlusal force, yet they remain non significantly different from those in maxilla. Conclusions: The relatively high success rates of microimplants make them an appropriate solution for providing absolute anchorage whenever being needed in orthodontic therapy
topic microimplant
orthodontic miniscrew
absolute anchorage
url https://rden.mosuljournals.com/pdf_164444_f45065441564cbf7b801cae646e783ee.html
work_keys_str_mv AT ahmadaabdulmawjood successandfailureratesoforthodonticmicroimplantsaclinicalstudy
AT mahmoodkhahmad successandfailureratesoforthodonticmicroimplantsaclinicalstudy
AT zaidstawfiq successandfailureratesoforthodonticmicroimplantsaclinicalstudy
_version_ 1724542435854385152