Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain

Content analysis is a powerful tool for investigating attitudes expressed in naturally occurring language data. It is a useful tool to help researchers develop an understanding of a specific research field through identifying how particular issues or topics have been conceptualized or where fieldwor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kylie Fisk, Adrian Cherney, Matthew Hornsey, Andrew Smith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-11-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012467788
id doaj-9199fabe34764b20a0d66852542eb555
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9199fabe34764b20a0d66852542eb5552020-11-25T03:21:38ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402012-11-01210.1177/215824401246778810.1177_2158244012467788Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research DomainKylie Fisk0Adrian Cherney1Matthew Hornsey2Andrew Smith3 University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia University of Queensland, St Lucia, AustraliaContent analysis is a powerful tool for investigating attitudes expressed in naturally occurring language data. It is a useful tool to help researchers develop an understanding of a specific research field through identifying how particular issues or topics have been conceptualized or where fieldwork can be limited or prohibitive. This is especially true for research on postconflict reconstruction, where large-scale quantitative surveying or metareviews of the literature can be prohibitive. The present study provides a case study of how a particular content analysis software program—Leximancer—was used to map factors associated with institutional legitimacy in postconflict societies. The case of Timor-Leste is used as an example. We examine texts at three levels of discourse: at the academic, official, and primary levels. Results indicate differing perspectives on legitimacy at each level of discourse. This article offers a snapshot of a potential method for understanding how particular topics are conceptualized within a specific research field and can thus help in the development of evaluation methods or data collection instruments.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012467788
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kylie Fisk
Adrian Cherney
Matthew Hornsey
Andrew Smith
spellingShingle Kylie Fisk
Adrian Cherney
Matthew Hornsey
Andrew Smith
Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain
SAGE Open
author_facet Kylie Fisk
Adrian Cherney
Matthew Hornsey
Andrew Smith
author_sort Kylie Fisk
title Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain
title_short Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain
title_full Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain
title_fullStr Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain
title_full_unstemmed Using Computer-Aided Content Analysis to Map a Research Domain
title_sort using computer-aided content analysis to map a research domain
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2012-11-01
description Content analysis is a powerful tool for investigating attitudes expressed in naturally occurring language data. It is a useful tool to help researchers develop an understanding of a specific research field through identifying how particular issues or topics have been conceptualized or where fieldwork can be limited or prohibitive. This is especially true for research on postconflict reconstruction, where large-scale quantitative surveying or metareviews of the literature can be prohibitive. The present study provides a case study of how a particular content analysis software program—Leximancer—was used to map factors associated with institutional legitimacy in postconflict societies. The case of Timor-Leste is used as an example. We examine texts at three levels of discourse: at the academic, official, and primary levels. Results indicate differing perspectives on legitimacy at each level of discourse. This article offers a snapshot of a potential method for understanding how particular topics are conceptualized within a specific research field and can thus help in the development of evaluation methods or data collection instruments.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244012467788
work_keys_str_mv AT kyliefisk usingcomputeraidedcontentanalysistomaparesearchdomain
AT adriancherney usingcomputeraidedcontentanalysistomaparesearchdomain
AT matthewhornsey usingcomputeraidedcontentanalysistomaparesearchdomain
AT andrewsmith usingcomputeraidedcontentanalysistomaparesearchdomain
_version_ 1724613529117392896