Efficacy of Low-Pressure Inflation of Oversized Drug-Coated Balloon for Coronary Artery Disease

Objectives. This study sought to assess the efficacy of oversized drug-coated balloon (DCB) inflation at low pressure for the prevention of acute dissections and late restenosis. Background. The major limitation of DCB coronary angioplasty is the occurrence of severe dissection after inflation of DC...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katsumi Ueno, Norihiko Morita, Yoshinobu Kojima, Hiroki Kondo, Hiroshi Takahashi, Shingo Minatoguchi, Sho Higuchi, Yu Ando, Masayasu Esaki
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6615988
id doaj-91835bfcf2e345bdb556b94491491f5c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-91835bfcf2e345bdb556b94491491f5c2021-01-11T02:21:04ZengHindawi-WileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology1540-81832020-01-01202010.1155/2020/6615988Efficacy of Low-Pressure Inflation of Oversized Drug-Coated Balloon for Coronary Artery DiseaseKatsumi Ueno0Norihiko Morita1Yoshinobu Kojima2Hiroki Kondo3Hiroshi Takahashi4Shingo Minatoguchi5Sho Higuchi6Yu Ando7Masayasu Esaki8Department of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of Medical StatisticsDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyDepartment of CardiologyObjectives. This study sought to assess the efficacy of oversized drug-coated balloon (DCB) inflation at low pressure for the prevention of acute dissections and late restenosis. Background. The major limitation of DCB coronary angioplasty is the occurrence of severe dissection after inflation of DCB. Methods. Between 2014 and 2018, 273 consecutive patients were retrospectively studied. 191 lesions (154 patients) treated by oversized DCB inflation at low pressure (<4 atm, 2.4 ± 1.2 atm, DCB/artery ratio 1.14 ± 0.22; LP group) were compared with 135 lesions (119 patients) treated by the standard DCB technique (7.1 ± 2.2 atm, DCB/artery ratio 1.03 ± 0.16; SP group). Results. Although the lesions in the LP group were more complex than those in the SP group (smaller reference diameter (2.38 mm vs. 2.57 mm, P=0.011), longer lesions (11.7 mm vs. 10.5 mm, P=0.10), and more frequent use of rotational atherectomy (45.0% vs. 28.1%, P=0.003), there was no significant difference in the NHLBI type of dissections between the two groups (11.5%, 12.0%, 5.2% vs. 12.6%, 12.6%, 2.2% in type A, B, and C, P=0.61), and no bailout stenting was required. In 125 well-matched lesion pairs after propensity score analysis, the cumulative incidence of target lesion revascularization at 3 years was 4.5% vs. 7.0%, respectively (P=0.60). Late lumen loss (−0.00 mm vs. −0.01 mm, P=0.94) and restenosis rates (7.4% vs. 7.1%, P=1.0) were similar in both of the groups. Conclusion. The application of oversized DCB at low pressure is effective and feasible for preventing late restenosis comparative to the standard technique of DCB.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6615988
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katsumi Ueno
Norihiko Morita
Yoshinobu Kojima
Hiroki Kondo
Hiroshi Takahashi
Shingo Minatoguchi
Sho Higuchi
Yu Ando
Masayasu Esaki
spellingShingle Katsumi Ueno
Norihiko Morita
Yoshinobu Kojima
Hiroki Kondo
Hiroshi Takahashi
Shingo Minatoguchi
Sho Higuchi
Yu Ando
Masayasu Esaki
Efficacy of Low-Pressure Inflation of Oversized Drug-Coated Balloon for Coronary Artery Disease
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
author_facet Katsumi Ueno
Norihiko Morita
Yoshinobu Kojima
Hiroki Kondo
Hiroshi Takahashi
Shingo Minatoguchi
Sho Higuchi
Yu Ando
Masayasu Esaki
author_sort Katsumi Ueno
title Efficacy of Low-Pressure Inflation of Oversized Drug-Coated Balloon for Coronary Artery Disease
title_short Efficacy of Low-Pressure Inflation of Oversized Drug-Coated Balloon for Coronary Artery Disease
title_full Efficacy of Low-Pressure Inflation of Oversized Drug-Coated Balloon for Coronary Artery Disease
title_fullStr Efficacy of Low-Pressure Inflation of Oversized Drug-Coated Balloon for Coronary Artery Disease
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Low-Pressure Inflation of Oversized Drug-Coated Balloon for Coronary Artery Disease
title_sort efficacy of low-pressure inflation of oversized drug-coated balloon for coronary artery disease
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
issn 1540-8183
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Objectives. This study sought to assess the efficacy of oversized drug-coated balloon (DCB) inflation at low pressure for the prevention of acute dissections and late restenosis. Background. The major limitation of DCB coronary angioplasty is the occurrence of severe dissection after inflation of DCB. Methods. Between 2014 and 2018, 273 consecutive patients were retrospectively studied. 191 lesions (154 patients) treated by oversized DCB inflation at low pressure (<4 atm, 2.4 ± 1.2 atm, DCB/artery ratio 1.14 ± 0.22; LP group) were compared with 135 lesions (119 patients) treated by the standard DCB technique (7.1 ± 2.2 atm, DCB/artery ratio 1.03 ± 0.16; SP group). Results. Although the lesions in the LP group were more complex than those in the SP group (smaller reference diameter (2.38 mm vs. 2.57 mm, P=0.011), longer lesions (11.7 mm vs. 10.5 mm, P=0.10), and more frequent use of rotational atherectomy (45.0% vs. 28.1%, P=0.003), there was no significant difference in the NHLBI type of dissections between the two groups (11.5%, 12.0%, 5.2% vs. 12.6%, 12.6%, 2.2% in type A, B, and C, P=0.61), and no bailout stenting was required. In 125 well-matched lesion pairs after propensity score analysis, the cumulative incidence of target lesion revascularization at 3 years was 4.5% vs. 7.0%, respectively (P=0.60). Late lumen loss (−0.00 mm vs. −0.01 mm, P=0.94) and restenosis rates (7.4% vs. 7.1%, P=1.0) were similar in both of the groups. Conclusion. The application of oversized DCB at low pressure is effective and feasible for preventing late restenosis comparative to the standard technique of DCB.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6615988
work_keys_str_mv AT katsumiueno efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
AT norihikomorita efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
AT yoshinobukojima efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
AT hirokikondo efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
AT hiroshitakahashi efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
AT shingominatoguchi efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
AT shohiguchi efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
AT yuando efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
AT masayasuesaki efficacyoflowpressureinflationofoversizeddrugcoatedballoonforcoronaryarterydisease
_version_ 1714950042541883392