How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and Methods
Measurement procedures are not error-free. Potential users of a measurement procedure need to know the expected magnitude of the measurement error in order to justify its use, in particular in health care settings. Gold standard procedures providing exact measurements for comparisons are often lacki...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-01-01
|
Series: | Diagnostics |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/2/162 |
id |
doaj-917848fa39014b39ab851b3f7617e0b9 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-917848fa39014b39ab851b3f7617e0b92021-01-23T00:06:04ZengMDPI AGDiagnostics2075-44182021-01-011116216210.3390/diagnostics11020162How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and MethodsWerner Vach0Oke Gerke1Basel Academy for Quality and Research in Medicine, 4051 Basel, SwitzerlandDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, 5000 Odense, DenmarkMeasurement procedures are not error-free. Potential users of a measurement procedure need to know the expected magnitude of the measurement error in order to justify its use, in particular in health care settings. Gold standard procedures providing exact measurements for comparisons are often lacking. Consequently, scientific investigations of the measurement error are often based on using replicates. However, a standardized terminology (and partially also methodology) for such investigations is lacking. In this paper, we explain the basic conceptual approach of such investigations with minimal reference to existing terminology and describe the link to the existing general statistical methodology. This way, some of the key measures used in such investigations can be explained in a simple manner and some light can be shed on existing terminology. We encourage clearly conceptually distinguishing between investigations of the measurement error of a single measurement procedure and the comparison between different measurement procedures or observers. We also identify an unused potential for more advanced statistical analyses in scientific investigations of the measurement error.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/2/162measurement errorreplicatesagreementrepeatabilityreproducibilityreliability |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Werner Vach Oke Gerke |
spellingShingle |
Werner Vach Oke Gerke How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and Methods Diagnostics measurement error replicates agreement repeatability reproducibility reliability |
author_facet |
Werner Vach Oke Gerke |
author_sort |
Werner Vach |
title |
How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and Methods |
title_short |
How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and Methods |
title_full |
How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and Methods |
title_fullStr |
How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
How Replicates Can Inform Potential Users of a Measurement Procedure about Measurement Error: Basic Concepts and Methods |
title_sort |
how replicates can inform potential users of a measurement procedure about measurement error: basic concepts and methods |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Diagnostics |
issn |
2075-4418 |
publishDate |
2021-01-01 |
description |
Measurement procedures are not error-free. Potential users of a measurement procedure need to know the expected magnitude of the measurement error in order to justify its use, in particular in health care settings. Gold standard procedures providing exact measurements for comparisons are often lacking. Consequently, scientific investigations of the measurement error are often based on using replicates. However, a standardized terminology (and partially also methodology) for such investigations is lacking. In this paper, we explain the basic conceptual approach of such investigations with minimal reference to existing terminology and describe the link to the existing general statistical methodology. This way, some of the key measures used in such investigations can be explained in a simple manner and some light can be shed on existing terminology. We encourage clearly conceptually distinguishing between investigations of the measurement error of a single measurement procedure and the comparison between different measurement procedures or observers. We also identify an unused potential for more advanced statistical analyses in scientific investigations of the measurement error. |
topic |
measurement error replicates agreement repeatability reproducibility reliability |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/11/2/162 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wernervach howreplicatescaninformpotentialusersofameasurementprocedureaboutmeasurementerrorbasicconceptsandmethods AT okegerke howreplicatescaninformpotentialusersofameasurementprocedureaboutmeasurementerrorbasicconceptsandmethods |
_version_ |
1724327233295745024 |