Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey
We study the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) anomaly and its determinants in Borsa Istanbul using quarterly earnings announcements and three different surprise measures. We find evidence supportive of the existence of PEAD in the Turkish stock market. Sorting stocks each quarter into three q...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Borsa Istanbul Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845020300508 |
id |
doaj-9161085ea63045f8ad73bd68a0e812bc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9161085ea63045f8ad73bd68a0e812bc2021-03-11T04:25:16ZengElsevierBorsa Istanbul Review2214-84502021-03-0121192103Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from TurkeyAykut Ahlatcıoğlu0Nesrin Okay1Bogazici University, TurkeyCorresponding author.; Bogazici University, TurkeyWe study the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) anomaly and its determinants in Borsa Istanbul using quarterly earnings announcements and three different surprise measures. We find evidence supportive of the existence of PEAD in the Turkish stock market. Sorting stocks each quarter into three quantiles according to an earnings surprise measure based on past earnings, we find both statistically and economically significant difference of 2.9% in average cumulative abnormal return between high earnings surprise firms and low earnings surprise firms in the 60 days following the announcement. The hedge returns obtained using analyst forecast based surprise measure as well earnings announcement return based surprise measure are also significant at 2.9% and 2.2% respectively. The positive relation between post-announcement abnormal returns and the surprise in earnings remain significant after controlling for an extensive list of explanatory variables. Among these explanatory variables, we find that firm size has a negative impact on the magnitude of this positive association between surprise and subsequent equity returns. Finally, using two separate approaches we show that multifactor models fail to explain the return differentials following earnings announcements.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845020300508G11G14G15 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu Nesrin Okay |
spellingShingle |
Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu Nesrin Okay Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey Borsa Istanbul Review G11 G14 G15 |
author_facet |
Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu Nesrin Okay |
author_sort |
Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu |
title |
Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey |
title_short |
Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey |
title_full |
Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey |
title_fullStr |
Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey |
title_full_unstemmed |
Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey |
title_sort |
post-earnings announcement drift: evidence from turkey |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Borsa Istanbul Review |
issn |
2214-8450 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
We study the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) anomaly and its determinants in Borsa Istanbul using quarterly earnings announcements and three different surprise measures. We find evidence supportive of the existence of PEAD in the Turkish stock market. Sorting stocks each quarter into three quantiles according to an earnings surprise measure based on past earnings, we find both statistically and economically significant difference of 2.9% in average cumulative abnormal return between high earnings surprise firms and low earnings surprise firms in the 60 days following the announcement. The hedge returns obtained using analyst forecast based surprise measure as well earnings announcement return based surprise measure are also significant at 2.9% and 2.2% respectively. The positive relation between post-announcement abnormal returns and the surprise in earnings remain significant after controlling for an extensive list of explanatory variables. Among these explanatory variables, we find that firm size has a negative impact on the magnitude of this positive association between surprise and subsequent equity returns. Finally, using two separate approaches we show that multifactor models fail to explain the return differentials following earnings announcements. |
topic |
G11 G14 G15 |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845020300508 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT aykutahlatcıoglu postearningsannouncementdriftevidencefromturkey AT nesrinokay postearningsannouncementdriftevidencefromturkey |
_version_ |
1724226041059213312 |