Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey

We study the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) anomaly and its determinants in Borsa Istanbul using quarterly earnings announcements and three different surprise measures. We find evidence supportive of the existence of PEAD in the Turkish stock market. Sorting stocks each quarter into three q...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu, Nesrin Okay
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Borsa Istanbul Review
Subjects:
G11
G14
G15
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845020300508
id doaj-9161085ea63045f8ad73bd68a0e812bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9161085ea63045f8ad73bd68a0e812bc2021-03-11T04:25:16ZengElsevierBorsa Istanbul Review2214-84502021-03-0121192103Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from TurkeyAykut Ahlatcıoğlu0Nesrin Okay1Bogazici University, TurkeyCorresponding author.; Bogazici University, TurkeyWe study the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) anomaly and its determinants in Borsa Istanbul using quarterly earnings announcements and three different surprise measures. We find evidence supportive of the existence of PEAD in the Turkish stock market. Sorting stocks each quarter into three quantiles according to an earnings surprise measure based on past earnings, we find both statistically and economically significant difference of 2.9% in average cumulative abnormal return between high earnings surprise firms and low earnings surprise firms in the 60 days following the announcement. The hedge returns obtained using analyst forecast based surprise measure as well earnings announcement return based surprise measure are also significant at 2.9% and 2.2% respectively. The positive relation between post-announcement abnormal returns and the surprise in earnings remain significant after controlling for an extensive list of explanatory variables. Among these explanatory variables, we find that firm size has a negative impact on the magnitude of this positive association between surprise and subsequent equity returns. Finally, using two separate approaches we show that multifactor models fail to explain the return differentials following earnings announcements.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845020300508G11G14G15
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu
Nesrin Okay
spellingShingle Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu
Nesrin Okay
Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey
Borsa Istanbul Review
G11
G14
G15
author_facet Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu
Nesrin Okay
author_sort Aykut Ahlatcıoğlu
title Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey
title_short Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey
title_full Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey
title_fullStr Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Post-earnings announcement drift: Evidence from Turkey
title_sort post-earnings announcement drift: evidence from turkey
publisher Elsevier
series Borsa Istanbul Review
issn 2214-8450
publishDate 2021-03-01
description We study the post-earnings announcement drift (PEAD) anomaly and its determinants in Borsa Istanbul using quarterly earnings announcements and three different surprise measures. We find evidence supportive of the existence of PEAD in the Turkish stock market. Sorting stocks each quarter into three quantiles according to an earnings surprise measure based on past earnings, we find both statistically and economically significant difference of 2.9% in average cumulative abnormal return between high earnings surprise firms and low earnings surprise firms in the 60 days following the announcement. The hedge returns obtained using analyst forecast based surprise measure as well earnings announcement return based surprise measure are also significant at 2.9% and 2.2% respectively. The positive relation between post-announcement abnormal returns and the surprise in earnings remain significant after controlling for an extensive list of explanatory variables. Among these explanatory variables, we find that firm size has a negative impact on the magnitude of this positive association between surprise and subsequent equity returns. Finally, using two separate approaches we show that multifactor models fail to explain the return differentials following earnings announcements.
topic G11
G14
G15
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214845020300508
work_keys_str_mv AT aykutahlatcıoglu postearningsannouncementdriftevidencefromturkey
AT nesrinokay postearningsannouncementdriftevidencefromturkey
_version_ 1724226041059213312