Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report

Several types of contraception methods exist, and among these are hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs). Cases have been reported of fractured IUD pieces and retention of copper fragments upon attempted removal in office. These findings suggest the importance of careful removal of an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jordan Sarver, Melissa Cregan, Daniel Cain
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-01-01
Series:Case Reports in Women's Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214911221000035
id doaj-9153a55262cd44ffb20b9ce6dde82768
record_format Article
spelling doaj-9153a55262cd44ffb20b9ce6dde827682021-02-13T04:25:06ZengElsevierCase Reports in Women's Health2214-91122021-01-0129e00287Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case reportJordan Sarver0Melissa Cregan1Daniel Cain2Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH 45701, United States of America; Corresponding author.Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Athens, OH 45701, United States of AmericaTwins Springs Gynecology, Massillon, OH 44646, United States of AmericaSeveral types of contraception methods exist, and among these are hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs). Cases have been reported of fractured IUD pieces and retention of copper fragments upon attempted removal in office. These findings suggest the importance of careful removal of an IUD by providers. A 38-year-old Caucasian woman, gravida 2, para 2, presented for a colposcopy and endometrial biopsy (EMB). She had had a copper IUD (ParaGard) placed 10 years prior. She now requested to have it removed. After completion of the colposcopy and EMB, the provider located the IUD strings for removal. During careful removal of the IUD, a piece was broken off and remained in the uterine cavity. Upon visual inspection of the removed IUD, the right wing was missing and presumed to be still in the patient. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) confirmed presence of a portion of the IUD in the uterine wall near the cervix. The patient was scheduled for surgical removal of the IUD by robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. This case highlights the importance of thorough evaluation of an IUD upon removal. Practitioners who work with IUD insertion and removal should remain informed about this rare complication. Risk of fracture during IUD removal should be better communicated between physicians and patients. This case study underlines the importance of careful IUD planning, from insertion to removal. Further research considering improved stepwise removal should be considered.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214911221000035GynecologyFracturedIntrauterine deviceCopperRemovalCase report
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jordan Sarver
Melissa Cregan
Daniel Cain
spellingShingle Jordan Sarver
Melissa Cregan
Daniel Cain
Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
Case Reports in Women's Health
Gynecology
Fractured
Intrauterine device
Copper
Removal
Case report
author_facet Jordan Sarver
Melissa Cregan
Daniel Cain
author_sort Jordan Sarver
title Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_short Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_full Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_fullStr Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Fractured copper intrauterine device (IUD) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: A case report
title_sort fractured copper intrauterine device (iud) retained in the uterine wall leading to hysterectomy: a case report
publisher Elsevier
series Case Reports in Women's Health
issn 2214-9112
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Several types of contraception methods exist, and among these are hormonal and non-hormonal intrauterine devices (IUDs). Cases have been reported of fractured IUD pieces and retention of copper fragments upon attempted removal in office. These findings suggest the importance of careful removal of an IUD by providers. A 38-year-old Caucasian woman, gravida 2, para 2, presented for a colposcopy and endometrial biopsy (EMB). She had had a copper IUD (ParaGard) placed 10 years prior. She now requested to have it removed. After completion of the colposcopy and EMB, the provider located the IUD strings for removal. During careful removal of the IUD, a piece was broken off and remained in the uterine cavity. Upon visual inspection of the removed IUD, the right wing was missing and presumed to be still in the patient. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) confirmed presence of a portion of the IUD in the uterine wall near the cervix. The patient was scheduled for surgical removal of the IUD by robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. This case highlights the importance of thorough evaluation of an IUD upon removal. Practitioners who work with IUD insertion and removal should remain informed about this rare complication. Risk of fracture during IUD removal should be better communicated between physicians and patients. This case study underlines the importance of careful IUD planning, from insertion to removal. Further research considering improved stepwise removal should be considered.
topic Gynecology
Fractured
Intrauterine device
Copper
Removal
Case report
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214911221000035
work_keys_str_mv AT jordansarver fracturedcopperintrauterinedeviceiudretainedintheuterinewallleadingtohysterectomyacasereport
AT melissacregan fracturedcopperintrauterinedeviceiudretainedintheuterinewallleadingtohysterectomyacasereport
AT danielcain fracturedcopperintrauterinedeviceiudretainedintheuterinewallleadingtohysterectomyacasereport
_version_ 1724271993091522560