CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ROK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS

In this paper we discuss spent fuel management options in the Republic of Korea (ROK) from two interrelated perspectives: Centralized dry cask storage and spent fuel pyroprocessing and burning in sodium fast reactors (SFRs). We argue that the ROK will run out of space for at-reactors spent fuel stor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CHAIM BRAUN, ROBERT FORREST
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2013-08-01
Series:Nuclear Engineering and Technology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315300292
id doaj-915151acae7641329c77ae05b8038389
record_format Article
spelling doaj-915151acae7641329c77ae05b80383892020-11-24T21:04:21ZengElsevierNuclear Engineering and Technology1738-57332013-08-0145442743810.5516/NET.06.2013.708CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ROK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIONSCHAIM BRAUNROBERT FORRESTIn this paper we discuss spent fuel management options in the Republic of Korea (ROK) from two interrelated perspectives: Centralized dry cask storage and spent fuel pyroprocessing and burning in sodium fast reactors (SFRs). We argue that the ROK will run out of space for at-reactors spent fuel storage by about the year 2030 and will thus need to transition centralized dry cask storage. Pyroprocessing plant capacity, even if approved and successfully licensed and constructed by that time, will not suffice to handle all the spent fuel discharged annually. Hence centralized dry cask storage will be required even if the pyroprocessing option is successfully developed by 2030. Pyroprocessing is but an enabling technology on the path leading to fissile material recycling and burning in future SFRs. In this regard we discuss two SFR options under development in the U.S.: the Super Prism and the Travelling Wave Reactor (TWR). We note that the U.S. is further along in reactor development than the ROK. The ROK though has acquired more experience, recently in investigating fuel recycling options for SFRs. We thus call for two complementary joint R&D project to be conducted by U.S. and ROK scientists. One leading to the development of a demonstration centralized away-from-reactors spent fuel storage facility. The other involve further R&D on a combined SFR-fuel cycle complex based on the reactor and fuel cycle options discussed in the paper.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315300292ROK – U.S. Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation (123 Agreement)EnrichmentReprocessing (ENR) RightsSpent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) ManagementDry Cask StorageIndependent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)PyroprocessingKorea Advanced Pyroprocessing Facility (KAPF)Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR)Super-PrismTravelling Wave Reactor (TWR)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author CHAIM BRAUN
ROBERT FORREST
spellingShingle CHAIM BRAUN
ROBERT FORREST
CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ROK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
Nuclear Engineering and Technology
ROK – U.S. Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation (123 Agreement)
Enrichment
Reprocessing (ENR) Rights
Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Management
Dry Cask Storage
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
Pyroprocessing
Korea Advanced Pyroprocessing Facility (KAPF)
Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR)
Super-Prism
Travelling Wave Reactor (TWR)
author_facet CHAIM BRAUN
ROBERT FORREST
author_sort CHAIM BRAUN
title CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ROK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
title_short CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ROK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
title_full CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ROK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
title_fullStr CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ROK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
title_full_unstemmed CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING ROK SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL MANAGEMENT OPTIONS
title_sort considerations regarding rok spent nuclear fuel management options
publisher Elsevier
series Nuclear Engineering and Technology
issn 1738-5733
publishDate 2013-08-01
description In this paper we discuss spent fuel management options in the Republic of Korea (ROK) from two interrelated perspectives: Centralized dry cask storage and spent fuel pyroprocessing and burning in sodium fast reactors (SFRs). We argue that the ROK will run out of space for at-reactors spent fuel storage by about the year 2030 and will thus need to transition centralized dry cask storage. Pyroprocessing plant capacity, even if approved and successfully licensed and constructed by that time, will not suffice to handle all the spent fuel discharged annually. Hence centralized dry cask storage will be required even if the pyroprocessing option is successfully developed by 2030. Pyroprocessing is but an enabling technology on the path leading to fissile material recycling and burning in future SFRs. In this regard we discuss two SFR options under development in the U.S.: the Super Prism and the Travelling Wave Reactor (TWR). We note that the U.S. is further along in reactor development than the ROK. The ROK though has acquired more experience, recently in investigating fuel recycling options for SFRs. We thus call for two complementary joint R&D project to be conducted by U.S. and ROK scientists. One leading to the development of a demonstration centralized away-from-reactors spent fuel storage facility. The other involve further R&D on a combined SFR-fuel cycle complex based on the reactor and fuel cycle options discussed in the paper.
topic ROK – U.S. Agreement for Nuclear Cooperation (123 Agreement)
Enrichment
Reprocessing (ENR) Rights
Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) Management
Dry Cask Storage
Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI)
Pyroprocessing
Korea Advanced Pyroprocessing Facility (KAPF)
Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR)
Super-Prism
Travelling Wave Reactor (TWR)
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1738573315300292
work_keys_str_mv AT chaimbraun considerationsregardingrokspentnuclearfuelmanagementoptions
AT robertforrest considerationsregardingrokspentnuclearfuelmanagementoptions
_version_ 1716771457675034624