How Satiating Are the ‘Satiety’ Peptides: A Problem of Pharmacology versus Physiology in the Development of Novel Foods for Regulation of Food Intake
Developing novel foods to suppress energy intake and promote negative energy balance and weight loss has been a long-term but commonly unsuccessful challenge. Targeting regulation of appetite is of interest to public health researchers and industry in the quest to develop ‘functional&#...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-07-01
|
Series: | Nutrients |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/7/1517 |
id |
doaj-9150433ba3664f64955a91eaaf9ad8e8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-9150433ba3664f64955a91eaaf9ad8e82020-11-25T02:33:23ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432019-07-01117151710.3390/nu11071517nu11071517How Satiating Are the ‘Satiety’ Peptides: A Problem of Pharmacology versus Physiology in the Development of Novel Foods for Regulation of Food IntakeJia Jiet Lim0Sally D. Poppitt1Human Nutrition Unit, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1024, New ZealandRiddet Institute, Palmerston North 4442, New ZealandDeveloping novel foods to suppress energy intake and promote negative energy balance and weight loss has been a long-term but commonly unsuccessful challenge. Targeting regulation of appetite is of interest to public health researchers and industry in the quest to develop ‘functional’ foods, but poor understanding of the underpinning mechanisms regulating food intake has hampered progress. The gastrointestinal (GI) or ‘satiety’ peptides including cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) secreted following a meal, have long been purported as predictive biomarkers of appetite response, including food intake. Whilst peptide infusion drives a clear change in hunger/fullness and eating behaviour, inducing GI-peptide secretion through diet may not, possibly due to modest effects of single meals on peptide levels. We conducted a review of 70 dietary preload (DIET) and peptide infusion (INFUSION) studies in lean healthy adults that reported outcomes of CCK, GLP-1 and PYY. DIET studies were acute preload interventions. INFUSION studies showed that minimum increase required to suppress ad libitum energy intake for CCK, GLP-1 and PYY was 3.6-, 4.0- and 3.1-fold, respectively, achieved through DIET in only 29%, 0% and 8% of interventions. Whether circulating ‘thresholds’ of peptide concentration likely required for behavioural change can be achieved through diet is questionable. As yet, no individual or group of peptides can be measured in blood to reliably predict feelings of hunger and food intake. Developing foods that successfully target enhanced secretion of GI-origin ‘satiety’ peptides for weight loss remains a significant challenge.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/7/1517appetitesatietycholecystokininglucagon-like peptide-1peptide YYdietary studiesinfusion studies |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jia Jiet Lim Sally D. Poppitt |
spellingShingle |
Jia Jiet Lim Sally D. Poppitt How Satiating Are the ‘Satiety’ Peptides: A Problem of Pharmacology versus Physiology in the Development of Novel Foods for Regulation of Food Intake Nutrients appetite satiety cholecystokinin glucagon-like peptide-1 peptide YY dietary studies infusion studies |
author_facet |
Jia Jiet Lim Sally D. Poppitt |
author_sort |
Jia Jiet Lim |
title |
How Satiating Are the ‘Satiety’ Peptides: A Problem of Pharmacology versus Physiology in the Development of Novel Foods for Regulation of Food Intake |
title_short |
How Satiating Are the ‘Satiety’ Peptides: A Problem of Pharmacology versus Physiology in the Development of Novel Foods for Regulation of Food Intake |
title_full |
How Satiating Are the ‘Satiety’ Peptides: A Problem of Pharmacology versus Physiology in the Development of Novel Foods for Regulation of Food Intake |
title_fullStr |
How Satiating Are the ‘Satiety’ Peptides: A Problem of Pharmacology versus Physiology in the Development of Novel Foods for Regulation of Food Intake |
title_full_unstemmed |
How Satiating Are the ‘Satiety’ Peptides: A Problem of Pharmacology versus Physiology in the Development of Novel Foods for Regulation of Food Intake |
title_sort |
how satiating are the ‘satiety’ peptides: a problem of pharmacology versus physiology in the development of novel foods for regulation of food intake |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nutrients |
issn |
2072-6643 |
publishDate |
2019-07-01 |
description |
Developing novel foods to suppress energy intake and promote negative energy balance and weight loss has been a long-term but commonly unsuccessful challenge. Targeting regulation of appetite is of interest to public health researchers and industry in the quest to develop ‘functional’ foods, but poor understanding of the underpinning mechanisms regulating food intake has hampered progress. The gastrointestinal (GI) or ‘satiety’ peptides including cholecystokinin (CCK), glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and peptide YY (PYY) secreted following a meal, have long been purported as predictive biomarkers of appetite response, including food intake. Whilst peptide infusion drives a clear change in hunger/fullness and eating behaviour, inducing GI-peptide secretion through diet may not, possibly due to modest effects of single meals on peptide levels. We conducted a review of 70 dietary preload (DIET) and peptide infusion (INFUSION) studies in lean healthy adults that reported outcomes of CCK, GLP-1 and PYY. DIET studies were acute preload interventions. INFUSION studies showed that minimum increase required to suppress ad libitum energy intake for CCK, GLP-1 and PYY was 3.6-, 4.0- and 3.1-fold, respectively, achieved through DIET in only 29%, 0% and 8% of interventions. Whether circulating ‘thresholds’ of peptide concentration likely required for behavioural change can be achieved through diet is questionable. As yet, no individual or group of peptides can be measured in blood to reliably predict feelings of hunger and food intake. Developing foods that successfully target enhanced secretion of GI-origin ‘satiety’ peptides for weight loss remains a significant challenge. |
topic |
appetite satiety cholecystokinin glucagon-like peptide-1 peptide YY dietary studies infusion studies |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/11/7/1517 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jiajietlim howsatiatingarethesatietypeptidesaproblemofpharmacologyversusphysiologyinthedevelopmentofnovelfoodsforregulationoffoodintake AT sallydpoppitt howsatiatingarethesatietypeptidesaproblemofpharmacologyversusphysiologyinthedevelopmentofnovelfoodsforregulationoffoodintake |
_version_ |
1724814470731005952 |