Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 20...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Adem Altunkol, Deniz Abat, Nevzat Can Sener, Mehmet Gulum, Halil Ciftci, Murat Savas, Ercan Yeni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-91351464480f4dc2abd1e192ebb78141
record_format Article
spelling doaj-91351464480f4dc2abd1e192ebb781412020-11-24T21:12:03ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-611944598799510.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0194S1677-55382018000500987Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?Adem AltunkolDeniz AbatNevzat Can SenerMehmet GulumHalil CiftciMurat SavasErcan YeniABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987&lng=en&tlng=enBiofeedbackPsychologyChildUrinary Tract Infections
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Adem Altunkol
Deniz Abat
Nevzat Can Sener
Mehmet Gulum
Halil Ciftci
Murat Savas
Ercan Yeni
spellingShingle Adem Altunkol
Deniz Abat
Nevzat Can Sener
Mehmet Gulum
Halil Ciftci
Murat Savas
Ercan Yeni
Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Biofeedback
Psychology
Child
Urinary Tract Infections
author_facet Adem Altunkol
Deniz Abat
Nevzat Can Sener
Mehmet Gulum
Halil Ciftci
Murat Savas
Ercan Yeni
author_sort Adem Altunkol
title Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_short Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_full Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_fullStr Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_full_unstemmed Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
title_sort is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
issn 1677-6119
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.
topic Biofeedback
Psychology
Child
Urinary Tract Infections
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT ademaltunkol isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding
AT denizabat isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding
AT nevzatcansener isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding
AT mehmetgulum isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding
AT halilciftci isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding
AT muratsavas isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding
AT ercanyeni isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding
_version_ 1716751684854611968