Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 20...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
|
Series: | International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987&lng=en&tlng=en |
id |
doaj-91351464480f4dc2abd1e192ebb78141 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-91351464480f4dc2abd1e192ebb781412020-11-24T21:12:03ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-611944598799510.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2018.0194S1677-55382018000500987Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding?Adem AltunkolDeniz AbatNevzat Can SenerMehmet GulumHalil CiftciMurat SavasErcan YeniABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987&lng=en&tlng=enBiofeedbackPsychologyChildUrinary Tract Infections |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Adem Altunkol Deniz Abat Nevzat Can Sener Mehmet Gulum Halil Ciftci Murat Savas Ercan Yeni |
spellingShingle |
Adem Altunkol Deniz Abat Nevzat Can Sener Mehmet Gulum Halil Ciftci Murat Savas Ercan Yeni Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding? International Brazilian Journal of Urology Biofeedback Psychology Child Urinary Tract Infections |
author_facet |
Adem Altunkol Deniz Abat Nevzat Can Sener Mehmet Gulum Halil Ciftci Murat Savas Ercan Yeni |
author_sort |
Adem Altunkol |
title |
Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding? |
title_short |
Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding? |
title_full |
Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding? |
title_fullStr |
Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding? |
title_sort |
is urotherapy alone as effective as a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback in children with dysfunctional voiding? |
publisher |
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia |
series |
International Brazilian Journal of Urology |
issn |
1677-6119 |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To compare standard urotherapy with a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback sessions and to determine the changes that these therapies promote in children with dysfunctional voiding. Patients and Methods: The data of 45 patients who participated in the study from January 2010 to March 2013 were evaluated. All patients underwent urinary system ultrasonography to determine post-void residual urine volumes and urinary system anomalies. All patients were diagnosed using uroflowmetry - electromyography (EMG). The flow pattern, maximum flow rate, and urethral sphincter activity were evaluated in all patients using uroflowmetry - EMG. Each patient underwent standard urotherapy, and the results were recorded. Subsequently, biofeedback sessions were added for all patients, and the changes in the results were recorded and statistically compared. Results: A total of forty - five patients were included, of which 34 were female and 11 were male and the average age of the patients was 8.4 ± 2.44 years (range: 5 - 15 years). After the standard urotherapy plus biofeedback sessions, the post-void residual urine volumes, incontinence rates and infection rates of patients were significantly lower than those with the standard urotherapy (p < 0.05). A statistically significant improvement in voiding symptoms was observed after the addition of biofeedback sessions to the standard urotherapy compared with the standard urotherapy alone (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed that a combination of urotherapy and biofeedback was more effective in decreasing urinary incontinence rates, infection rates and post - void residual urine volumes in children with dysfunctional voiding than standard urotherapy alone, and it also showed that this combination therapy corrected voiding patterns significantly and objectively. |
topic |
Biofeedback Psychology Child Urinary Tract Infections |
url |
http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382018000500987&lng=en&tlng=en |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ademaltunkol isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding AT denizabat isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding AT nevzatcansener isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding AT mehmetgulum isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding AT halilciftci isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding AT muratsavas isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding AT ercanyeni isurotherapyaloneaseffectiveasacombinationofurotherapyandbiofeedbackinchildrenwithdysfunctionalvoiding |
_version_ |
1716751684854611968 |