The Danube Dynamics of the Real Estate Transfer Tax

The real estate transfer tax was introduced by the Habsburgs in the 19th century and has remained an integral part of the tax system of almost all countries historically belonging to their Danube monarchy. One century after the monarchy’s collapse, their common roots as well as national particularit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pelikánová Radka MacGregor, Jánošíková Petra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2017-12-01
Series:Danube
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2017-0013
id doaj-912d7020a26e4e92801aa48ff00c7a42
record_format Article
spelling doaj-912d7020a26e4e92801aa48ff00c7a422021-09-05T20:42:42ZengSciendoDanube1804-82852017-12-018419120610.1515/danb-2017-0013danb-2017-0013The Danube Dynamics of the Real Estate Transfer TaxPelikánová Radka MacGregor0Jánošíková Petra1University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, Faculty of Law, Department of Business Law, Sady Petatricátníku 14, 306 14 Pilsen, Czech RepublicUniversity of West Bohemia in Pilsen Faculty of Law, Department of Financial Law and National Economy, Sady Petatricátníku 14, 306 14 Pilsen, Czech RepublicThe real estate transfer tax was introduced by the Habsburgs in the 19th century and has remained an integral part of the tax system of almost all countries historically belonging to their Danube monarchy. One century after the monarchy’s collapse, their common roots as well as national particularities can be observed. The goal of this paper is to confirm or reject the proposed hypothesis that the real estate transfer tax and its rate in post-Danube monarchy countries reflects more general public policies and preferences than neutral fiscal needs as suggested by GDP, GDP/capita, government debt/GDP, tax revenue/GDP, etc. The critical, genesis reflecting and comparative meta-analysis of the information about the dynamics of the evaluating regimes of the real estate transfer tax leads to the conclusion in the form of the confirmation of the proposed hypothesis, especially regarding the Czech Republic, making real estate transfer tax conceptually more a political than a fiscal instrument and posing a set of Socratic style questions inviting further research.https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2017-0013real estate transfer taxtax lawhabsburg monarchystate budget
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Pelikánová Radka MacGregor
Jánošíková Petra
spellingShingle Pelikánová Radka MacGregor
Jánošíková Petra
The Danube Dynamics of the Real Estate Transfer Tax
Danube
real estate transfer tax
tax law
habsburg monarchy
state budget
author_facet Pelikánová Radka MacGregor
Jánošíková Petra
author_sort Pelikánová Radka MacGregor
title The Danube Dynamics of the Real Estate Transfer Tax
title_short The Danube Dynamics of the Real Estate Transfer Tax
title_full The Danube Dynamics of the Real Estate Transfer Tax
title_fullStr The Danube Dynamics of the Real Estate Transfer Tax
title_full_unstemmed The Danube Dynamics of the Real Estate Transfer Tax
title_sort danube dynamics of the real estate transfer tax
publisher Sciendo
series Danube
issn 1804-8285
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The real estate transfer tax was introduced by the Habsburgs in the 19th century and has remained an integral part of the tax system of almost all countries historically belonging to their Danube monarchy. One century after the monarchy’s collapse, their common roots as well as national particularities can be observed. The goal of this paper is to confirm or reject the proposed hypothesis that the real estate transfer tax and its rate in post-Danube monarchy countries reflects more general public policies and preferences than neutral fiscal needs as suggested by GDP, GDP/capita, government debt/GDP, tax revenue/GDP, etc. The critical, genesis reflecting and comparative meta-analysis of the information about the dynamics of the evaluating regimes of the real estate transfer tax leads to the conclusion in the form of the confirmation of the proposed hypothesis, especially regarding the Czech Republic, making real estate transfer tax conceptually more a political than a fiscal instrument and posing a set of Socratic style questions inviting further research.
topic real estate transfer tax
tax law
habsburg monarchy
state budget
url https://doi.org/10.1515/danb-2017-0013
work_keys_str_mv AT pelikanovaradkamacgregor thedanubedynamicsoftherealestatetransfertax
AT janosikovapetra thedanubedynamicsoftherealestatetransfertax
AT pelikanovaradkamacgregor danubedynamicsoftherealestatetransfertax
AT janosikovapetra danubedynamicsoftherealestatetransfertax
_version_ 1717785255526531072