The Indexical Voice: Communication of Personal States and Traits in Humans and Other Primates

Many studies of primate vocalization have been undertaken to improve our understanding of the evolution of language. Perhaps, for this reason, investigators have focused on calls that were thought to carry symbolic information about the environment. Here I suggest that even if these calls were in fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: John L. Locke
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651108/full
id doaj-912cc8f44d8b467f866230fdb991d334
record_format Article
spelling doaj-912cc8f44d8b467f866230fdb991d3342021-04-15T06:01:53ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-04-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.651108651108The Indexical Voice: Communication of Personal States and Traits in Humans and Other PrimatesJohn L. LockeMany studies of primate vocalization have been undertaken to improve our understanding of the evolution of language. Perhaps, for this reason, investigators have focused on calls that were thought to carry symbolic information about the environment. Here I suggest that even if these calls were in fact symbolic, there were independent reasons to question this approach in the first place. I begin by asking what kind of communication system would satisfy a species’ biological needs. For example, where animals benefit from living in large groups, I ask how members would need to communicate to keep their groups from fragmenting. In this context, I discuss the role of social grooming and “close calls,” including lip-smacking and grunting. Parallels exist in human societies, where information is exchanged about all kinds of things, often less about the nominal topic than the communicants themselves. This sort of indexical (or personal) information is vital to group living, which presupposes the ability to tolerate, relate to, and interact constructively with other individuals. Making indexical communication the focus of comparative research encourages consideration of somatic and behavioral cues that facilitate relationships and social benefits, including cooperation and collaboration. There is ample room here for a different and potentially more fruitful approach to communication in humans and other primates, one that focuses on personal appraisals, based on cues originating with individuals, rather than signals excited by environmental events.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651108/fullcuessignalsalarm callsclose callsgroominglip-smacking
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John L. Locke
spellingShingle John L. Locke
The Indexical Voice: Communication of Personal States and Traits in Humans and Other Primates
Frontiers in Psychology
cues
signals
alarm calls
close calls
grooming
lip-smacking
author_facet John L. Locke
author_sort John L. Locke
title The Indexical Voice: Communication of Personal States and Traits in Humans and Other Primates
title_short The Indexical Voice: Communication of Personal States and Traits in Humans and Other Primates
title_full The Indexical Voice: Communication of Personal States and Traits in Humans and Other Primates
title_fullStr The Indexical Voice: Communication of Personal States and Traits in Humans and Other Primates
title_full_unstemmed The Indexical Voice: Communication of Personal States and Traits in Humans and Other Primates
title_sort indexical voice: communication of personal states and traits in humans and other primates
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-04-01
description Many studies of primate vocalization have been undertaken to improve our understanding of the evolution of language. Perhaps, for this reason, investigators have focused on calls that were thought to carry symbolic information about the environment. Here I suggest that even if these calls were in fact symbolic, there were independent reasons to question this approach in the first place. I begin by asking what kind of communication system would satisfy a species’ biological needs. For example, where animals benefit from living in large groups, I ask how members would need to communicate to keep their groups from fragmenting. In this context, I discuss the role of social grooming and “close calls,” including lip-smacking and grunting. Parallels exist in human societies, where information is exchanged about all kinds of things, often less about the nominal topic than the communicants themselves. This sort of indexical (or personal) information is vital to group living, which presupposes the ability to tolerate, relate to, and interact constructively with other individuals. Making indexical communication the focus of comparative research encourages consideration of somatic and behavioral cues that facilitate relationships and social benefits, including cooperation and collaboration. There is ample room here for a different and potentially more fruitful approach to communication in humans and other primates, one that focuses on personal appraisals, based on cues originating with individuals, rather than signals excited by environmental events.
topic cues
signals
alarm calls
close calls
grooming
lip-smacking
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.651108/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnllocke theindexicalvoicecommunicationofpersonalstatesandtraitsinhumansandotherprimates
AT johnllocke indexicalvoicecommunicationofpersonalstatesandtraitsinhumansandotherprimates
_version_ 1721526568867594240